Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Paula Badosa Gibert vs Jodie Anna Burrage Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gibert vs Burrage analysis and find out who is favored!
Paula Badosa Gibert vs Jodie Anna Burrage Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gibert has won 45.95% of points on his second serve, while Burrage has won 43.58%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gibert, in recent form, has won 57.23% of his opponent's second serve points, while Burrage has won 58.33%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.87% and 32.24% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gibert has saved 67.72% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Burrage has saved 55.7% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gibert has won 54.17% of matches played (W/L 13/ 11), with Burrage winning 50% (W/L 25/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gibert has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 162/ 86), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 15/ 12). Burrage has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 54/ 33), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 35% (W/L 6/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Gibert has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 61.54% of matches (W/L 8/ 5), where as Burrage has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 56% of matches (W/L 14/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gibert winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Gibert winning 0 and Burrage winning 2. The last match between Gibert and Burrage was at the Viking International - Eastbourne, 21-06-2022, Second, Grass with Jodie Anna Burrage getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:13:46.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gibert and Burrage have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gibert winning 0 times and Burrage 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gibert winning 0, and Burrage 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gibert has played against opponents with an average rank of 152.33 while Burrage has played against players with an average rank of 214.74.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gibert has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Burrage has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gibert has converted 43% of breakpoint opportunities, and Burrage has converted 45.45% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gibert 0 - 1 Burrage
101
Rank
2
High
26
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass1
98
Rank
85
High
24
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
64% (342-193)
Career Total W/L
59% (231-162)
43% (6-8)
YTD W/L
50% (5-5)
$4,840,519
Career Prize Money
$330,361
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Paula Badosa Gibert | Jodie Anna Burrage |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 7 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:13:46 | 1:13:46 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (37/63) | 61% (30/49) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 57% (21/37) | 80% (24/30) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 58% (15/26) | 47% (9/19) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 31% (4/13) |
| Return Points W% | 33% (16/49) | 43% (27/63) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Jodie Anna Burrage
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
60
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Paula Badosa Gibert | Jodie Anna Burrage |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 43% (6/8) | 50% (5/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (16/16) | 52% (12/11) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (148/146) | 51% (105/102) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 45% (5/6) | 20% (1/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 80% (4/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.43 | 0.45 |
| Aces Total | 61 | 45 |
| DFs per game | 0.51 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 73 | 24 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:33 | 1:33:16 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 222.29 | 121.4 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (577/1021) | 62% (389/623) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (393/577) | 69% (267/389) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (204/444) | 43% (101/234) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (43/100) | 44% (33/75) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (386/947) | 42% (288/684) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (2/4) | 57% (4/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (6/11) | 50% (5/10) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (6/4) | 80% (5/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (6/2) | 20% (5/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (8/2) | 20% (5/1) |
Paula Badosa Gibert Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
66%
(
70 of
106)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
90)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
41 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
90)
100
Total Points Won
96
|
7-6(4) 4-6 3-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Diana Shnaider
51%
(
44 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
4
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
2
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Danielle Rose Collins
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
8
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Simona Halep
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
63%
(
61 of
97)
5
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
10
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
33%
(
11 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
97)
92
Total Points Won
87
|
1-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lulu Sun
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
53%
(
18 of
34)
1st Serve %
56%
(
22 of
39)
3
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
17 of
22)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
11 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
38
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Leylah Annie Fernandez
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
88)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
10
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
81
Total Points Won
77
|
0-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
45%
(
43 of
96)
1st Serve %
69%
(
70 of
102)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
47%
(
25 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
44%
(
42 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
49 of
102)
103
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Diana Shnaider
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
57
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 3-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Lanlana Tararudee
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
74)
3
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
7
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
37%
(
14 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
40%
(
38 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
90
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Jodie Anna Burrage Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Marina Melnikova
Player
Jodie Anna Burrage
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
28%
(
7 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Jodie Anna Burrage
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
43%
(
20 of
46)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jodie Anna Burrage
Player
Jaqueline Cristian
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
33 of
43)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jodie Anna Burrage
Player
Varvara Gracheva
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jodie Anna Burrage
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
71%
(
66 of
93)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
88
|
5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jodie Anna Burrage
Player
Emiliana Arango
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
78%
(
45 of
58)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamara Korpatsch
Player
Jodie Anna Burrage
59%
(
48 of
82)
1st Serve %
76%
(
51 of
67)
0
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
71
|
2-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
Player
Jodie Anna Burrage
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Jodie Anna Burrage
56%
(
61 of
109)
1st Serve %
70%
(
51 of
73)
9
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
79%
(
48 of
61)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
38%
(
18 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
39%
(
43 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
25 of
73)
91
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jodie Anna Burrage
Player
Astra Sharma
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Gibert Vs Burrage Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
