Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Paula Badosa Gibert vs Jelena Ostapenko Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gibert vs Ostapenko analysis and find out who is favored!
Paula Badosa Gibert vs Jelena Ostapenko Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gibert 2 - 3 Ostapenko
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gibert has won 47.06% of points on their second serve, while Ostapenko has won 41.82%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gibert, in recent form, has won 57.04% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ostapenko has won 57.81%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.59% and 38.44% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gibert has saved 61.19% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ostapenko has saved 53.71% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gibert has won 65.22% of matches played (W/L 30/ 16), with Ostapenko winning 60.34% (W/L 35/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gibert has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 167/ 89), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 26/ 18). Ostapenko has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 69% (W/L 53/ 24), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 137/ 111).
- Player level: In the last year, Gibert has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 58.82% of matches (W/L 10/ 7), where as Ostapenko has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 56% of matches (W/L 14/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 5 times before with Gibert winning 2 times and Ostapenko being victorious 3 times. They have played 12 sets in total, with Gibert winning 6 and Ostapenko winning 6. The last match between Gibert and Ostapenko was at the National Bank Open - Toronto, 08-08-2024, Second, Hard with Jelena Ostapenko getting the victory 3-6 7-6(3) 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:30:6.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gibert and Ostapenko have played a deciding set 2 times, with Gibert winning 0 times and Ostapenko 2 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Gibert winning 1, and Ostapenko 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gibert has played against opponents with an average rank of 53.48 while Ostapenko has played against players with an average rank of 72.14.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gibert has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ostapenko has won 65% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gibert has converted 46.71% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ostapenko has converted 50.97% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
20
Rank
2
High
26
Age
R
Plays
2
Total3
1
Hard1
1
Clay1
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
12
Rank
5
High
27
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
65% (366-201)
Career Total W/L
62% (391-239)
65% (30-16)
YTD W/L
62% (31-19)
$6,128,593
Career Prize Money
$10,760,751
1
YTD Titles
2
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Paula Badosa Gibert vs Jelena Ostapenko For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Gibert VS Ostapenko
| stats | Paula Badosa Gibert | Jelena Ostapenko |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 3 |
| Sets Won | 6 | 6 |
| Games Won | 54 | 58 |
| Aces (Total) | 25 | 11 |
| DFs Total | 23 | 31 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:30:6 | 1:30:6 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (201/352) | 57% (191/337) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 64% (129/201) | 66% (126/191) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 42% (64/151) | 45% (65/146) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 49% (18/37) | 51% (20/39) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (146/337) | 45% (159/352) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (2/5) | 60% (3/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (3/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (3/1) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 33% (3/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 7-6(3) 6-2 |
Stats 
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
55%
(
51 of
92)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
3
Aces
9
12
Double Faults
9
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
41 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
93)
94
Total Points Won
91
|
||||
| 6-2 4-6 6-3 |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
45%
(
38 of
84)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
84)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
||||
| 7-6(1) 6-1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
63)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
10
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Paula Badosa Gibert | Jelena Ostapenko |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 65% (30/16) | 62% (31/19) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 62% (68/41) | 58% (67/49) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (555/458) | 53% (577/516) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 68% (19/9) | 58% (14/10) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 55% (6/5) | 57% (8/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (4/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 71% (5/2) | 63% (5/3) |
| Aces pg | 0.46 | 0.37 |
| Aces Total | 228 | 195 |
| DFs per game | 0.52 | 0.49 |
| DFs Total | 257 | 259 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:10 | 1:32:22 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 53.48 | 72.42 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (1946/3407) | 58% (1973/3419) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (1346/1946) | 66% (1310/1973) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (686/1461) | 44% (633/1444) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (180/386) | 47% (189/399) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (1464/3306) | 45% (1487/3319) |
| Slam W/L | 73% (11/4) | 64% (7/4) |
| Masters W/L | 59% (10/7) | 56% (10/8) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 64% (9/5) | 67% (12/6) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 69% (29/42) | 62% (31/50) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 67% (8/12) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (12/20) | 69% (11/16) |
| 1st set W, W | 81% (26/21) | 93% (27/25) |
| 1st set W, L | 19% (26/5) | 7% (27/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 45% (20/9) | 26% (23/6) |
Paula Badosa Gibert Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
7
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Yafan Wang
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
4
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Elena Gabriela Ruse
46%
(
49 of
107)
1st Serve %
45%
(
42 of
93)
8
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
3
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
41%
(
24 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
44%
(
47 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
93)
107
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-1 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Taylor Townsend
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
6
Aces
6
8
Double Faults
5
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
5 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
81
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Viktorija Golubic
46%
(
19 of
41)
1st Serve %
75%
(
39 of
52)
4
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
68%
(
13 of
19)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
39%
(
16 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jessica Pegula
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
62%
(
60 of
97)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
88)
5
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
8
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
39 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
97
Total Points Won
88
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova
44%
(
23 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Yulia Putintseva
55%
(
39 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
7
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Anna Kalinskaya
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
31 of
44)
5
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
1
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Peyton Stearns
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
9
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Jelena Ostapenko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Marina Stakusic
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
58%
(
73 of
125)
1st Serve %
48%
(
57 of
120)
5
Aces
10
17
Double Faults
17
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
40%
(
21 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
22 of
63)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
46%
(
57 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
61 of
120)
129
Total Points Won
116
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naomi Osaka
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
9
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
6
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elina Avanesyan
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
46%
(
21 of
46)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
49%
(
32 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
43 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
2-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Taylor Townsend
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
12 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
55%
(
51 of
92)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
3
Aces
9
12
Double Faults
9
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
41 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
93)
94
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
61 of
94)
1
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
4
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
46%
(
26 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
92)
81
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Barbora Krejcikova
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve %
49%
(
41 of
84)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
81%
(
38 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Yulia Putintseva
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Bernarda Pera
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Daria Snigur
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
8
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
53
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Free Tennis Predictions For Today's Matches
A few tennis predictions for upcoming lower level events head to head tennis matches are below. If you want to get access to the best matches that will win you the most, subscribe to our tennis predictions plan for a low monthly fee and get full access to all our expert picks with full odds analysis and value bets.
Gibert Vs Ostapenko Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Gibert are available here and Ostapenko photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
