Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Paula Badosa Gibert vs Irina CANTOS Siemers Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gibert vs Siemers analysis and find out who is favored!
Paula Badosa Gibert vs Irina CANTOS Siemers Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gibert has won 45.95% of points on his second serve, while Siemers has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gibert, in recent form, has won 57.23% of his opponent's second serve points, while Siemers has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.87% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gibert has saved 67.72% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Siemers has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gibert has won 53.85% of matches played (W/L 14/ 12), with Siemers winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gibert has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 162/ 86), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 15/ 12). Siemers has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Gibert has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 61.54% of matches (W/L 8/ 5), where as Siemers has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gibert has played against opponents with an average rank of 146.88 while Siemers has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gibert has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Siemers has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gibert has converted 43% of breakpoint opportunities, and Siemers has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gibert 0 - 0 Siemers
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Paula Badosa Gibert | Irina CANTOS Siemers |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 43% (6/8) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (16/16) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (148/146) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 45% (5/6) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0.43 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 61 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0.51 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 73 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:33 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 222.29 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (577/1021) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (393/577) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (204/444) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (43/100) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (386/947) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 67% (2/1) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 40% (2/3) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (2/4) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (6/11) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (6/4) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (6/2) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (8/2) | 1st Match |
Paula Badosa Gibert Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
66%
(
70 of
106)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
90)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
41 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
90)
100
Total Points Won
96
|
7-6(4) 4-6 3-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Diana Shnaider
51%
(
44 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
4
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
2
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Danielle Rose Collins
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
8
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Simona Halep
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
63%
(
61 of
97)
5
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
10
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
33%
(
11 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
97)
92
Total Points Won
87
|
1-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lulu Sun
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
53%
(
18 of
34)
1st Serve %
56%
(
22 of
39)
3
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
17 of
22)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
11 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
38
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Leylah Annie Fernandez
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
88)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
10
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
81
Total Points Won
77
|
0-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
45%
(
43 of
96)
1st Serve %
69%
(
70 of
102)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
47%
(
25 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
44%
(
42 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
49 of
102)
103
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Diana Shnaider
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
57
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 3-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Lanlana Tararudee
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
74)
3
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
7
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
37%
(
14 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
40%
(
38 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
90
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Irina CANTOS Siemers Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Adriana Reami
Player
Irina Cantos Siemers
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
45%
(
27 of
60)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
26 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexa Glatch
Player
Irina Cantos Siemers
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
9
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Shuo Feng
Player
Irina Cantos Siemers
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
10
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
24 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Irina Cantos Siemers
Player
Marta Falceto Font
73%
(
52 of
71)
1st Serve %
75%
(
41 of
55)
2
Aces
0
11
Double Faults
8
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
7%
(
1 of
14)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gemma Lairon Navarro
Player
Irina Cantos Siemers
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
74%
(
39 of
53)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 3-6 6-2 10-7 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Timea Jaruskova
Player
Irina Cantos Siemers
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sohyun Park
Player
Irina Cantos Siemers
66%
(
75 of
113)
1st Serve %
60%
(
73 of
122)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
22
52%
(
39 of
75)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
47 of
73)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
14 of
49)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
50%
(
56 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
61 of
122)
118
Total Points Won
117
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Irina Cantos Siemers
Player
Nikola Tomanova
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
74%
(
50 of
68)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
1
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Gibert Vs Siemers Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
