MATCHSTAT PRO

Every edge, every game, every day

New customer offer
One Sport
All Sports Promo
Tennis
$29.99/billed monthly
  • Unlimited daily predictions
  • Unlock best bets with edge
  • Access all tipster picks
  • Filter & segment data
  • Unlock all models
  • CANCEL ANYTIME
Subscribe

Paula Badosa Gibert vs Elise Mertens Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

By Wojtek Kolan

Head-to-head: Gibert 1 - 0 Mertens

They have played 2 sets in total, with Gibert winning 2 and Mertens winning 0. The last match between Gibert and Mertens was at the Dubai Duty Free Championships - Dubai, 18-02-2025, Second, Hard with Paula Badosa Gibert getting the victory 6-2 6-1.

Dubai Duty Free Championships - Dubai(18-02-2025)

Stats
59% (10-7)
YTD Win/Loss
74% (14-5)
1
Head-to-Head
0
10
Ranking
28
2
Highest Rank
12
27
Age
29
R
Plays
R
11
Titles
20
64% (383-211)
Career Total W/L
63% (460-266)
$7,685,068
Career Prize Money
$9,021,091
0
YTD Titles
1
1
Hard H2H
0
0
Clay H2H
0
0
Indoor H2H
0
0
Grass H2H
0

Today’s Tennis Tips:

Rune VS Medvedev PREDICTION Hard

BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp

14 Mar 2025 / Semifinals

ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE

Daniil Medvedev

To Win

64.9 %
2.01%

Draper VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Hard

BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp

15 Mar 2025 / Semifinals

ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE

Jack Draper

To Win

30.95 %
9.3%

Gibert VS Mertens H2H Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-2 6-1
cross
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Elise Mertens
63% ( 30 of 48)
1st Serve %
53% ( 20 of 38)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
87% ( 26 of 30)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 13 of 20)
56% ( 10 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
17% ( 3 of 18)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
25% ( 12 of 48)
Rtn Points Won
58% ( 22 of 38)
58
Total Points Won
28

Gibert VS Mertens H2H Stats

Paula Badosa Gibert Gibert
Stats
Elise Mertens Mertens
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
0
12
Games Won
3
4
Aces (Total)
2
2
Total Double Faults
4
1:13:35
Average Match Time
1:13:35
63% (30/48)
1st Serve %
53% (20/38)
87% (26/30)
1st Serve Win %
65% (13/20)
56% (10/18)
2nd Serve Win %
17% (3/18)
57% (4/7)
Break Points Won % (Total)
0% (0/1)
58% (22/38)
Return Points Win %
25% (12/48)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

Paula Badosa Gibert vs Elise Mertens Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Paula Badosa Gibert 1 - 0 Elise Mertens

Insights on the upcoming tennis match:

  1. Recent form analysis reveals that in the past six months, there has been a close battle between Gibert and Mertens in terms of their second serve performance. Gibert has emerged victorious in 46.27% of points on their second serve, while Mertens has achieved a slightly lower success rate of 45.9%. It is worth noting that this statistic holds a significant correlation to the accuracy of match predictions.
  2. Examining the return game stats in recent form, Gibert has displayed a commendable performance by winning 55.97% of their opponent's second serve points. On the other hand, Mertens has managed to secure 54.43% in this aspect. Similarly, for first serve returns, Gibert's success rate stands at 38.35%, whereas Mertens exhibits a slightly better rate of 41.71%. These return game statistics provide valuable insights to determine the prevailing favorite in their head-to-head matchup.
  3. An intriguing aspect to consider is the response of players under pressure. Gibert has demonstrated exceptional resilience by saving 61.37% of breakpoints in recent encounters, while Mertens has also put up a strong defense by saving 57.38%. This statistic serves as a useful tool for in-game betting predictions.
  4. Taking into account their overall performance in the past year, Gibert has emerged victorious in 67.21% of matches played, with a win-loss record of 41/20. Meanwhile, Mertens has achieved a decent success rate of 58.18% (32/23). These figures provide us with an overall prediction overview for their head-to-head clashes.
  5. Observing their performance on different surfaces, it is noteworthy that Gibert has showcased their best career win percentage on Clay, triumphing in 65% (167/89) of matches. However, their performance on I.hard surfaces has been comparatively weaker, with a win percentage of 58% (26/19). Conversely, Mertens has excelled on Hard surfaces with a career win percentage of 66% (270/139), but struggled comparatively on Grass, winning 52% (34/31) of matches.
  6. Analyzed within the context of player level, Gibert has predominantly competed in the Masters series, securing victories in 65.22% (15/8) of matches. In contrast, Mertens has chiefly participated in the Main tour, achieving a win rate of 64% (16/9). Thus, when evaluating the favorite based on player statistics, it is essential to consider the event level in which they have been competing.
  7. Examining the quality of opponents faced, Gibert has encountered players with an average rank of 56.1 over the last 12 months, while Mertens has faced opponents with an average rank of 64.29. This sheds light on the level of competition each player has been exposed to.
  8. In scenarios where a match enters a deciding set, Gibert has proven their mettle by winning 63% of deciding sets over the past year. In comparison, Mertens has achieved a slightly lower success rate of 53% in all matches played on tour. These statistics are particularly relevant for live predictions and betting enthusiasts.
  9. While past player performance holds considerable predictive power in tennis matches, it is also important to factor in current event stats to gauge the form of players. These stats can be found in the section below, if the players have already competed in the current event. Additionally, it is noteworthy that certain players might exhibit superior performance at specific events, adding further weight to their potential outcomes.
  10. Break point conversion statistics offer valuable insights into in-game live betting tips. Taking recent form into consideration, Gibert has capitalized on 48.35% of breakpoint opportunities, while Mertens has achieved a slightly lower success rate of 46.3% in breaking their opponent's serve.
  11. For those intrigued by models predicting tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent starting point. Please note, this article is tailored for statistical enthusiasts.

Paula Badosa Gibert Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
QF
cross
Daria Saville
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
64% ( 25 of 39)
1st Serve %
66% ( 31 of 47)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
44% ( 11 of 25)
1st Serve Won
68% ( 21 of 31)
43% ( 6 of 14)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 6 of 16)
50% ( 3 of 6)
Break Points Won
57% ( 4 of 7)
56% ( 22 of 39)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 20 of 47)
37
Total Points Won
49
L
1-6 5-3 ret. H2H
R2
cross
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Jaqueline Cristian
72% ( 31 of 43)
1st Serve %
58% ( 25 of 43)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
87% ( 27 of 31)
1st Serve Won
44% ( 11 of 25)
50% ( 6 of 12)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 8 of 18)
40% ( 4 of 10)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
23% ( 10 of 43)
Rtn Points Won
56% ( 24 of 43)
57
Total Points Won
29
W
6-2 6-1 H2H
R3
cross
Elena Rybakina
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
64% ( 87 of 137)
1st Serve %
58% ( 69 of 118)
10
Aces
8
8
Double Faults
8
68% ( 59 of 87)
1st Serve Won
68% ( 47 of 69)
44% ( 22 of 50)
2nd Serve Won
47% ( 23 of 49)
40% ( 4 of 10)
Break Points Won
29% ( 5 of 17)
41% ( 56 of 137)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 48 of 118)
129
Total Points Won
126
L
4-6 7-6(8) 7-6(2) H2H
R2
cross
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Elise Mertens
63% ( 30 of 48)
1st Serve %
53% ( 20 of 38)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
87% ( 26 of 30)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 13 of 20)
56% ( 10 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
17% ( 3 of 18)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
25% ( 12 of 48)
Rtn Points Won
58% ( 22 of 38)
58
Total Points Won
28
W
6-2 6-1 H2H
R1
cross
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Lulu Sun
56% ( 31 of 55)
1st Serve %
52% ( 34 of 66)
5
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
2
87% ( 27 of 31)
1st Serve Won
68% ( 23 of 34)
54% ( 13 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 13 of 32)
21% ( 3 of 14)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
27% ( 15 of 55)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 30 of 66)
70
Total Points Won
51
W
6-3 6-4 H2H
R2
cross
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
55% ( 37 of 67)
1st Serve %
63% ( 50 of 79)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
68% ( 25 of 37)
1st Serve Won
60% ( 30 of 50)
60% ( 18 of 30)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 12 of 29)
31% ( 4 of 13)
Break Points Won
20% ( 2 of 10)
36% ( 24 of 67)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 37 of 79)
80
Total Points Won
66
L
6-4 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Renata Zarazua
60% ( 47 of 78)
1st Serve %
68% ( 52 of 76)
14
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
74% ( 35 of 47)
1st Serve Won
62% ( 32 of 52)
42% ( 13 of 31)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 9 of 24)
67% ( 6 of 9)
Break Points Won
57% ( 4 of 7)
38% ( 30 of 78)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 35 of 76)
83
Total Points Won
71
W
6-3 4-6 6-2 H2H
R2
cross
Linda Noskova
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
76% ( 32 of 42)
1st Serve %
55% ( 31 of 56)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
63% ( 20 of 32)
1st Serve Won
52% ( 16 of 31)
60% ( 6 of 10)
2nd Serve Won
36% ( 9 of 25)
67% ( 6 of 9)
Break Points Won
67% ( 2 of 3)
38% ( 16 of 42)
Rtn Points Won
55% ( 31 of 56)
57
Total Points Won
41
L
6-4 6-1 H2H
SF
cross
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
63% ( 31 of 49)
1st Serve %
53% ( 38 of 72)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
77% ( 24 of 31)
1st Serve Won
66% ( 25 of 38)
61% ( 11 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 14 of 34)
44% ( 4 of 9)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
29% ( 14 of 49)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 33 of 72)
68
Total Points Won
53
L
6-4 6-2 H2H
QF
cross
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Cori Gauff
57% ( 36 of 63)
1st Serve %
60% ( 52 of 86)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
64% ( 23 of 36)
1st Serve Won
69% ( 36 of 52)
63% ( 17 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
35% ( 12 of 34)
40% ( 4 of 10)
Break Points Won
67% ( 2 of 3)
37% ( 23 of 63)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 38 of 86)
78
Total Points Won
71
W
7-5 6-4 H2H

Elise Mertens Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
R3
cross
Madison Keys
Player
Elise Mertens
59% ( 76 of 128)
1st Serve %
54% ( 66 of 123)
5
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
9
75% ( 57 of 76)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 46 of 66)
33% ( 17 of 52)
2nd Serve Won
40% ( 23 of 57)
38% ( 6 of 16)
Break Points Won
20% ( 3 of 15)
42% ( 54 of 128)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 54 of 123)
128
Total Points Won
123
L
6-2 6-7(8) 6-4 H2H
R2
cross
Elise Mertens
Player
Kimberly Birrell
59% ( 41 of 69)
1st Serve %
61% ( 39 of 64)
10
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
76% ( 31 of 41)
1st Serve Won
56% ( 22 of 39)
46% ( 13 of 28)
2nd Serve Won
60% ( 15 of 25)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
33% ( 2 of 6)
36% ( 25 of 69)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 27 of 64)
71
Total Points Won
62
W
6-4 7-5 H2H
R2
cross
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Elise Mertens
63% ( 30 of 48)
1st Serve %
53% ( 20 of 38)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
87% ( 26 of 30)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 13 of 20)
56% ( 10 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
17% ( 3 of 18)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
25% ( 12 of 48)
Rtn Points Won
58% ( 22 of 38)
58
Total Points Won
28
L
6-2 6-1 H2H
R1
cross
Elise Mertens
Player
Leylah Annie Fernandez
65% ( 33 of 51)
1st Serve %
56% ( 33 of 59)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
76% ( 25 of 33)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 20 of 33)
61% ( 11 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 10 of 26)
31% ( 4 of 13)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 4)
29% ( 15 of 51)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 29 of 59)
65
Total Points Won
45
W
6-2 6-2 H2H
R3
cross
Ekaterina Alexandrova
Player
Elise Mertens
53% ( 24 of 45)
1st Serve %
61% ( 31 of 51)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
71% ( 17 of 24)
1st Serve Won
58% ( 18 of 31)
71% ( 15 of 21)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 10 of 20)
80% ( 4 of 5)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
29% ( 13 of 45)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 23 of 51)
55
Total Points Won
41
L
6-4 6-2 H2H
R2
cross
Elise Mertens
Player
Cristina Bucsa
63% ( 31 of 49)
1st Serve %
63% ( 52 of 82)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
77% ( 24 of 31)
1st Serve Won
54% ( 28 of 52)
61% ( 11 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
37% ( 11 of 30)
28% ( 5 of 18)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
29% ( 14 of 49)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 43 of 82)
78
Total Points Won
53
W
6-2 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Elise Mertens
Player
Clara Tauson
77% ( 10 of 13)
1st Serve %
59% ( 13 of 22)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
90% ( 9 of 10)
1st Serve Won
46% ( 6 of 13)
100% ( 3 of 3)
2nd Serve Won
22% ( 2 of 9)
100% ( 3 of 3)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
8% ( 1 of 13)
Rtn Points Won
64% ( 14 of 22)
26
Total Points Won
9
W
6-0 ret. H2H
F
cross
Elise Mertens
Player
Ann Li
75% ( 39 of 52)
1st Serve %
55% ( 32 of 58)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
74% ( 29 of 39)
1st Serve Won
59% ( 19 of 32)
54% ( 7 of 13)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 10 of 26)
56% ( 5 of 9)
Break Points Won
20% ( 1 of 5)
31% ( 16 of 52)
Rtn Points Won
50% ( 29 of 58)
65
Total Points Won
45
W
6-1 6-4 H2H
SF
cross
Elise Mertens
Player
Xinyu Wang
70% ( 42 of 60)
1st Serve %
71% ( 41 of 58)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
74% ( 31 of 42)
1st Serve Won
54% ( 22 of 41)
44% ( 8 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
59% ( 10 of 17)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
33% ( 2 of 6)
35% ( 21 of 60)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 26 of 58)
65
Total Points Won
53
W
6-3 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Elise Mertens
Player
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
69% ( 36 of 52)
1st Serve %
66% ( 40 of 61)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
11
67% ( 24 of 36)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 26 of 40)
75% ( 12 of 16)
2nd Serve Won
24% ( 5 of 21)
40% ( 4 of 10)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
31% ( 16 of 52)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 30 of 61)
66
Total Points Won
47
W
6-4 6-2 H2H
banner

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

64% (383/211)
Win/Loss
63% (460/266)
62% (834/519)
Sets Win/Loss
61% (1009/652)
55% (6772/5623)
Games Win/Loss
55% (8273/6718)
65% (161/88)
Hard Win/Loss
66% (271/141)
65% (167/89)
Clay Win/Loss
63% (104/62)
64% (35/20)
Indoor Hard W/L
61% (51/32)
59% (20/14)
Grass Win/Loss
52% (34/31)
0.28
Aces Per Game
0.25
1684
Aces Total
1827
0.35
Double Faults Per Game
0.35
2103
Total Double Faults
2536
1:18:31
Average Match Time
1:17:3
376.61
Average Opponent Rank
377.76
60% (20235/33618)
1st Serve %
59% (22119/37420)
67% (13514/20235)
1st Serve Win %
66% (14652/22119)
46% (6178/13369)
2nd Serve Win %
45% (6897/15292)
46% (1950/4226)
Break Points Won % (Total)
48% (2399/5006)
45% (15275/33897)
Return Points Win %
46% (17858/38654)
66% (48/25)
Slam W/L
68% (78/37)
59% (57/40)
Masters W/L
51% (63/60)
33% (1/2)
Cups W/L
64% (9/5)
61% (85/54)
Main Tour W/L
63% (162/97)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
68% (159/75)
Challenger W/L
61% (83/52)
69% (33/15)
Futures W/L
81% (65/15)
67% (379/566)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
63% (452/714)
10% (1/10)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
63% (5/8)
61% (83/137)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
46% (62/136)
64% (112/175)
Deciding Set Win %
56% (115/206)
88% (372/327)
1st Set Won, Won Match
88% (458/404)
11% (372/42)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
12% (458/53)
25% (222/55)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
20% (268/53)

See recent tennis photos of Gibert and Mertens

Other Predictions

BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells

flag
16 Mar
flag
18:00
Prediction

W35 Nonthaburi

flag
flag
Prediction
  • Loading news...