Paul Jubb vs Roman Garkavenko Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Jubb vs Garkavenko analysis and find out who is favored!
Paul Jubb vs Roman Garkavenko Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jubb has won 53.83% of points on his second serve, while Garkavenko has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jubb, in recent form, has won 51.88% of his opponent's second serve points, while Garkavenko has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.72% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jubb has saved 61.71% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Garkavenko has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jubb has won 67.74% of matches played (W/L 42/ 20), with Garkavenko winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jubb has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 76% (W/L 51/ 16), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 45% (W/L 9/ 11). Garkavenko has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 27% (W/L 3/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Jubb has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 69.7% of matches (W/L 23/ 10), where as Garkavenko has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jubb winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Jubb winning 2 and Garkavenko winning 0. The last match between Jubb and Garkavenko was at the Slovakia F1 (Trnava), 24-07-2017, Q2 round, Clay with Paul Jubb getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Jubb and Garkavenko have played a deciding set 0 times, with Jubb winning 0 times and Garkavenko 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Jubb winning 0, and Garkavenko 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jubb has played against opponents with an average rank of 292.4 while Garkavenko has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jubb has won 41% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Garkavenko has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jubb has converted 44.16% of breakpoint opportunities, and Garkavenko has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Jubb 1 - 0 Garkavenko
9
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
8
Minor
372
Rank
196
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
69% (189-83)
Career Total W/L
27% (4-11)
66% (19-10)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$54,540
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jubb VS Garkavenko H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Paul Jubb | Roman Garkavenko |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 7 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Jubb VS Garkavenko H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-4 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Paul Jubb | Roman Garkavenko |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 66% (19/10) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 63% (45/27) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 55% (388/317) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 71% (10/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 69% (9/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.36 | 0 |
Aces Total | 125 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.26 | 0 |
DFs Total | 88 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:52:26 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 275.48 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 61% (1325/2158) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 72% (957/1325) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 55% (457/833) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 41% (96/234) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 41% (955/2325) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 66% (19/10) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 66% (19/29) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (6/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (7/14) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 83% (18/15) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 17% (18/3) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 36% (11/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Paul Jubb Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Yunseong Chung
Player
Paul Jubb
51%
(
44 of
87)
1st Serve %
50%
(
39 of
78)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
31 of
39)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
26 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Paul Jubb
Player
Egor Gerasimov
49%
(
36 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
96)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
48 of
96)
95
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Paul Jubb
Player
Andrew Fenty
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
2
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
5
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Paul Jubb
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
55%
(
52 of
94)
11
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
94)
98
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Paul Jubb
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
51 of
71)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Paul Jubb
Player
Li Tu
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
75
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Paul Jubb
Player
Fajing Sun
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Paul Jubb
Player
Jea Moon Lee
61%
(
73 of
120)
1st Serve %
66%
(
69 of
104)
6
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
0
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
42 of
69)
53%
(
25 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
39%
(
47 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
104)
117
Total Points Won
107
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Juan Pablo Varillas
Player
Paul Jubb
64%
(
62 of
97)
1st Serve %
67%
(
69 of
103)
5
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
35 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
103)
101
Total Points Won
99
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Valerio Aboian
Player
Paul Jubb
63%
(
59 of
94)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
94
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Roman Garkavenko Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Gibril Diarra
Player
Roman Garkavenko
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 2-6 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 2-0 ret. | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H |
view more