Paul Jubb vs Marsel Ilhan Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Jubb vs Ilhan analysis and find out who is favored!
Paul Jubb vs Marsel Ilhan Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jubb has won 53.59% of points on his second serve, while Ilhan has won 48.95%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jubb, in recent form, has won 51.86% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ilhan has won 56.42%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.76% and 32.08% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jubb has saved 61.78% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ilhan has saved 50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jubb has won 66.67% of matches played (W/L 36/ 18), with Ilhan winning 63.89% (W/L 23/ 13) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jubb has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 76% (W/L 51/ 16), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 45% (W/L 9/ 11). Ilhan has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 303/ 165), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 46% (W/L 19/ 22).
- Player level: In the last year, Jubb has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 69.7% of matches (W/L 23/ 10), where as Ilhan has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.64% of matches (W/L 21/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jubb winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Jubb winning 2 and Ilhan winning 1. The last match between Jubb and Ilhan was at the M15 Antalya, 17-12-2020, Second, Clay with Paul Jubb getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:42:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Jubb and Ilhan have played a deciding set 1 times, with Jubb winning 1 times and Ilhan 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Jubb winning 2, and Ilhan 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jubb has played against opponents with an average rank of 296 while Ilhan has played against players with an average rank of 87.67.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jubb has won 39% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ilhan has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jubb has converted 43.47% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ilhan has converted 53.49% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Jubb 1 - 0 Ilhan
9
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
8
Minor
417
Rank
196
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
877
Rank
77
High
36
Age
R
Plays
23
Total
0
Mast
4
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
19
Minor
Form
69% (183-81)
Career Total W/L
59% (640-447)
62% (13-8)
YTD W/L
63% (5-3)
$54,540
Career Prize Money
$591,915
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Paul Jubb | Marsel Ilhan |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 18 | 18 |
Aces (Total) | 3 | 3 |
DFs (Total) | 12 | 1 |
Avg Match Time | 2:42:0 | 2:42:0 |
1st Serve % | 59% (75/127) | 59% (66/112) |
1st Serve Win% | 65% (49/75) | 73% (48/66) |
2nd Serve Win% | 52% (27/52) | 46% (21/46) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 25% (3/12) |
Return Points W% | 38% (43/112) | 40% (51/127) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(5) 4-6 7-6(4) |
Paul Jubb
Player
Marsel Ilhan
59%
(
75 of
127)
1st Serve %
59%
(
66 of
112)
3
Aces
3
12
Double Faults
1
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
48 of
66)
52%
(
27 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
51 of
127)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
43 of
112)
119
Total Points Won
120
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Paul Jubb | Marsel Ilhan |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 62% (13/8) | 63% (5/3) |
Sets Win/Loss | 60% (31/21) | 58% (11/8) |
Games Win/Loss | 55% (276/228) | 53% (99/89) |
Hard Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 63% (5/3) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 69% (9/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.42 | 0.05 |
Aces Total | 104 | 5 |
DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.1 |
DFs Total | 57 | 9 |
Avg Match Time | 1:53:12 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 278.29 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 63% (962/1532) | 52% (178/343) |
1st Serve W% | 73% (699/962) | 69% (123/178) |
2nd Serve W% | 55% (313/570) | 47% (78/165) |
BPs Won% Total | 38% (67/177) | 62% (18/29) |
Return Pts W% | 41% (694/1704) | 43% (145/336) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 62% (13/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 63% (5/3) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (13/21) | 63% (5/8) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 100% (1/1) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (5/10) | 67% (2/3) |
1st set W, W | 83% (12/10) | 80% (5/4) |
1st set W, L | 17% (12/2) | 20% (5/1) |
1st set L, W | 33% (9/3) | 33% (3/1) |
Paul Jubb Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Juan Pablo Varillas
Player
Paul Jubb
64%
(
62 of
97)
1st Serve %
67%
(
69 of
103)
5
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
35 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
103)
101
Total Points Won
99
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Valerio Aboian
Player
Paul Jubb
63%
(
59 of
94)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
94
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
F |
Clement Chidekh
Player
Paul Jubb
62%
(
52 of
84)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
81)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
45%
(
38 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
81)
81
Total Points Won
84
|
0-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
SF |
Paul Jubb
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
73%
(
58 of
80)
1st Serve %
66%
(
80 of
121)
10
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
4
86%
(
50 of
58)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
58 of
80)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
20%
(
16 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
47 of
121)
111
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Paul Jubb
Player
Henry Searle
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
95)
5
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
2
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
26%
(
18 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
92
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Paul Jubb
Player
Charlie Robertson
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Paul Jubb
Player
Francesco Maestrelli
63%
(
57 of
91)
1st Serve %
57%
(
65 of
114)
6
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
5
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
48 of
65)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
30 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
47 of
114)
108
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Paul Jubb
Player
David Poljak
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
46%
(
30 of
65)
6
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
25 of
30)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
24 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Paul Jubb
Player
George Houghton
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
46%
(
33 of
72)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
84%
(
16 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
9 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Hamish Stewart
Player
Paul Jubb
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Marsel Ilhan Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Giuseppe La Vela
Player
Marsel Ilhan
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Mariano Tammaro
Player
Marsel Ilhan
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marsel Ilhan
Player
Lorenzo Carboni
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Marsel Ilhan
Player
Antonio Caruso
44%
(
29 of
66)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Marsel Ilhan
Player
Freek Van Donselaar
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
80)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
4-6 6-0 10-7 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-6(4) 0-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Gabriel Matuszewski
Player
Marsel Ilhan
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
23 of
30)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
55
Total Points Won
61
|
2-6 6-4 10-7 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Marko Maksimovic
Player
Marsel Ilhan
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
49%
(
44 of
90)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
34%
(
26 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(12) 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H |
view more