Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Prediction of Paul Jubb vs Linang Xiao Head-to-Head, Best Odds & Picks At Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Jubb vs Xiao analysis and find out who is favored!
Paul Jubb vs Linang Xiao Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Jubb 1 - 0 Xiao
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jubb has won 48.88% of points on their second serve, while Xiao has won 48.92%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jubb, in recent form, has won 53.63% of their opponent's second serve points, while Xiao has won 51.53%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.99% and 27.17% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jubb has saved 65.22% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Xiao has saved 59.18% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jubb has won 66.3% of matches played (W/L 61/ 31), with Xiao winning 46.34% (W/L 19/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jubb has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 76% (W/L 51/ 16), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 53% (W/L 18/ 16). Xiao has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 8/ 4), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 84/ 64).
- Player level: In the last year, Jubb has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.83% of matches (W/L 30/ 17), where as Xiao has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 11/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jubb winning 1 times and Xiao being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Jubb winning 2 and Xiao winning 0. The last match between Jubb and Xiao was at the Guangzhou Challenger, 09-09-2024, First, Hard with Paul Jubb getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:25:14.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Jubb and Xiao have played a deciding set 0 times, with Jubb winning 0 times and Xiao 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Jubb winning 0, and Xiao 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jubb has played against opponents with an average rank of 358.01 while Xiao has played against players with an average rank of 440.02.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jubb has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Xiao has won 55% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jubb has converted 42.48% of breakpoint opportunities, and Xiao has converted 34.51% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
183
Rank
183
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
733
Rank
666
High
24
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
69% (214-97)
Career Total W/L
58% (92-68)
65% (44-24)
YTD W/L
42% (13-18)
$159,460
Career Prize Money
$13,500
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Paul Jubb vs Linang Xiao For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Jubb VS Xiao
| stats | Paul Jubb | Linang Xiao |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 3 |
| DFs Total | 2 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:25:14 | 1:25:14 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (44/72) | 56% (29/52) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 68% (30/44) | 66% (19/29) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (16/28) | 48% (11/23) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 14% (1/7) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (22/52) | 36% (26/72) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Paul Jubb
Player
Linang Xiao
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Paul Jubb | Linang Xiao |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 65% (44/24) | 42% (13/18) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 62% (100/61) | 43% (30/40) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (841/704) | 47% (321/356) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (26/13) | 42% (13/18) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 69% (9/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 64% (9/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.4 | 0.24 |
| Aces Total | 302 | 78 |
| DFs per game | 0.31 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 235 | 75 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:29 | 1:40:21 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 335 | 399.97 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (3015/4890) | 58% (1157/2004) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (2157/3015) | 64% (741/1157) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (962/1875) | 51% (431/847) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (218/521) | 36% (71/197) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (2108/5089) | 39% (765/1983) |
| Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 67% (6/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 64% (30/17) | 38% (5/8) |
| Futures W/L | 78% (7/2) | 47% (7/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (43/66) | 41% (12/29) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 72% (13/18) | 60% (6/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (12/24) | 50% (5/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (44/38) | 77% (13/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (44/6) | 15% (13/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (24/6) | 11% (18/2) |
Paul Jubb Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Paul Jubb
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Linang Xiao
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Norbert Gombos
Player
Paul Jubb
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
77%
(
40 of
52)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Paul Jubb
61%
(
65 of
106)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
108)
14
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
9
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
40 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
108)
111
Total Points Won
103
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Jacob Fearnley
53%
(
32 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
6
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nishesh Basavareddy
Player
Paul Jubb
52%
(
37 of
71)
1st Serve %
49%
(
37 of
75)
4
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
6
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
10 of
38)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
84
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Luca Van Assche
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Joan Torres Espinosa
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Seongchan Hong
Player
Paul Jubb
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Billy Harris
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
8
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
2
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
25 of
30)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
36%
(
32 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
19 of
51)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Linang Xiao Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Linang Xiao
Player
Ye Cong Mo
52%
(
27 of
52)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
8
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Linang Xiao
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve %
53%
(
37 of
70)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(3) 5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Li Tu
Player
Linang Xiao
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Linang Xiao
Player
Shintaro Mochizuki
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jie Cui
Player
Linang Xiao
48%
(
25 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Linang Xiao
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Linang Xiao
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jie Cui
Player
Linang Xiao
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
53%
(
52 of
99)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
7
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
6-7(6) 6-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yusuke Takahashi
Player
Linang Xiao
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
45%
(
26 of
58)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
93%
(
25 of
27)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
8 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Linang Xiao
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
8
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
89%
(
31 of
35)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
22%
(
11 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Free Tennis Predictions For Today's Matches
A few tennis predictions for upcoming lower level events head to head tennis matches are below. If you want to get access to the best matches that will win you the most, subscribe to our tennis predictions plan for a low monthly fee and get full access to all our expert picks with full odds analysis and value bets.
Jubb Vs Xiao Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Jubb are available here and Xiao photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Paul Jubb
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Linang Xiao
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
