K. Sell
To Win
Y. Shimizu
To Win
Paul Jubb vs Karue Sell Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W L W L W L
Form
W W W L W W W L W LHead To Head: Jubb 1 - 0 Sell
They have played 2 sets in total, with Jubb winning 2 and Sell winning 0. The last match between Jubb and Sell was at the Little Rock Challenger, 28-05-2025, Round: First, Surface: Hard, with Paul Jubb getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Paul Jubb | 1 |
| Karue Sell | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Little Rock Challenger(28-05-2025)
Paul Jubb
Karue Sell
7
5
6
3
| Jubb | Stats | Sell |
|---|---|---|
| 44% (12-15) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (13-13) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 422 | Ranking | 289 |
| 180 | Highest Rank | 258 |
| 25 | Age | 31 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 11 | Titles | 6 |
| 67% (230-115) | Career Total W/L | 67% (157-78) |
| $200,960 | Career Prize Money | $6,390 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
09 Jul 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Anisimova VS Pavlyuchenkova PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
08 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Swiatek VS Samsonova PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
09 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-3 |
Stats 
Paul Jubb
Player
Karue Sell
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
47%
(
35 of
74)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:31:20 | Average Match Time | 1:31:20 |
| 70% (44/63) | 1st Serve % | 47% (35/74) |
| 64% (28/44) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (22/35) |
| 74% (14/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (18/39) |
| 33% (4/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 20% (1/5) |
| 46% (34/74) | Return Points Win % | 33% (21/63) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jubb vs Sell Match Preview :
- Over the past six months, Jubb has a stronger second serve performance, winning 47.07% of points, compared to Sell's 42.49%. Could this give Jubb an edge in tight moments?
- In return games, Sell slightly outperforms Jubb on opponents' second serves (43.03% vs. 42.59%). However, Jubb surpasses Sell on first serve returns with 29.73% versus 25.21%. Who might capitalize on return opportunities?
- Under pressure, Jubb saves 57.78% of breakpoints, better than Sell's 50.44%, suggesting Jubb might handle critical points effectively.
- Sell boasts a higher match winning rate over the past year at 67.21%, compared to Jubb's 50%. Does this indicate an overall advantage for Sell?
- Surface preferences highlight Sell's success on hard courts (71% win rate), while Jubb excels on clay (72%). Could the surface be a deciding factor?
- In tournaments above $10K, Sell has won 61.54% of matches, outperforming Jubb's 39.29% in the same category. How might tournament experience impact this matchup?
- Sell has faced opponents with an average rank of 375.36, while Jubb’s competitors average a rank of 261.25. Does this reflect on Jubb’s higher level of competition?
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Jubb holds a slight advantage, having won 50% compared to Sell's 41% over the last year.
- Sell displays superior breakpoint conversion prowess at 45.83%, clearly ahead of Jubb's 31.73%. Could this decide closely contested games?
Editorial Prediction (May 27, 2025, UTC):
Sell demonstrates a consistent track record in winning matches, particularly on hard courts and in high-stakes matches, evidenced by their breakpoint conversion rate. This strength in offensive situations gives Sell an advantage in seizing crucial points.
Jubb, with a more challenging roster of past opponents, might provide a tougher competition. However, Sell's experience and ability to overpower during key match moments position them favorably in this head-to-head.
While both players exhibit noteworthy strengths, the likelihood of Sell leveraging these to their advantage suggests a higher probability of winning this upcoming match.
Jubb vs Sell Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Paul Jubb Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Giulio Zeppieri
Player
Paul Jubb
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Thiago Agustin Tirante
47%
(
26 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
6
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Paul Jubb
68%
(
77 of
114)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
88)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
40 of
61)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
42 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
109
Total Points Won
93
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
56%
(
45 of
81)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
4
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marin Cilic
Player
Paul Jubb
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
7
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
21 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Giles Hussey
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
James Story
60%
(
76 of
127)
1st Serve %
70%
(
68 of
97)
4
Aces
16
10
Double Faults
7
75%
(
57 of
76)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
53 of
68)
39%
(
20 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
39%
(
50 of
127)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
31 of
97)
108
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(4) 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Paul Jubb
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
64)
9
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
9
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Karue Sell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Karue Sell
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
7
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
33 of
41)
67%
(
22 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Karue Sell
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
14
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Trevor Svajda
Player
Karue Sell
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
31 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
76)
84
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Karue Sell
Player
Dominique Rolland
67%
(
71 of
106)
1st Serve %
52%
(
53 of
101)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
75%
(
53 of
71)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
42 of
53)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
32%
(
34 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
101)
109
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Karue Sell
Player
Rudy Quan
44%
(
23 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Karue Sell
Player
Isaiah Strode
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
7
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Yibing Wu
Player
Karue Sell
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve %
51%
(
52 of
101)
9
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
49 of
101)
97
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Karue Sell
Player
Andres Martin
56%
(
48 of
86)
1st Serve %
70%
(
67 of
96)
5
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
44 of
67)
63%
(
24 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
96)
95
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67% (230/115) | Win/Loss | 67% (157/78) |
| 64% (511/292) | Sets Win/Loss | 65% (337/184) |
| 55% (4217/3454) | Games Win/Loss | 56% (2694/2124) |
| 70% (121/52) | Hard Win/Loss | 70% (107/45) |
| 72% (57/22) | Clay Win/Loss | 56% (27/21) |
| 58% (30/22) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66% (23/12) |
| 54% (22/19) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.29 | Aces Per Game | 0.34 |
| 1102 | Aces Total | 790 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 1026 | Total Double Faults | 474 |
| 1:36:44 | Average Match Time | 1:17:35 |
| 389.47 | Average Opponent Rank | 485.17 |
| 62% (13977/22528) | 1st Serve % | 58% (7447/12823) |
| 70% (9719/13977) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (5296/7447) |
| 52% (4482/8551) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (2827/5376) |
| 41% (1029/2487) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (632/1384) |
| 41% (9683/23440) | Return Points Win % | 42% (5365/12921) |
| 36% (5/9) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 63% (10/6) | Main Tour W/L | 33% (2/4) |
| 53% (65/57) | Challenger W/L | 59% (47/33) |
| 78% (150/43) | Futures W/L | 72% (108/41) |
| 68% (227/336) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (157/233) |
| 20% (1/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 60% (68/114) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (27/52) |
| 55% (61/110) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (30/52) |
| 90% (223/200) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (152/140) |
| 10% (223/22) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (152/12) |
| 25% (122/30) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (82/17) |
Jubb vs. Sell Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
