Paul Jubb vs Hyeon Chung Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L W L W L L
Form
W L W L W L W W L LHead-To-Head: Jubb 1 - 0 Chung
They have played 3 sets in total, with Jubb winning 2 and Chung winning 1. The last match between Jubb and Chung was at the Tyler Challenger, 03-06-2025, Round: First, Surface: Hard, with Paul Jubb getting the victory 4-6 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Paul Jubb | 1 |
| Hyeon Chung | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Tyler Challenger(03-06-2025)
Paul Jubb
Hyeon Chung
4
6
6
4
6
4
| Jubb | Stats | Chung |
|---|---|---|
| 43% (13-17) | YTD Win/Loss | 67% (29-14) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 397 | Ranking | 367 |
| 180 | Highest Rank | 19 |
| 25 | Age | 29 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 11 | Titles | 17 |
| 66% (231-117) | Career Total W/L | 65% (285-152) |
| $200,960 | Career Prize Money | $2,529,406 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 2 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Burruchaga VS Buse PREDICTION Clay
EFG Swiss Open - Gstaad atp
18 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Waltert VS Teichmann PREDICTION Clay
UniCredit Iasi Open - Iasi wta
18 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Paul Jubb
Player
Hyeon Chung
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
54%
(
50 of
92)
4
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
11
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
30%
(
10 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
49%
(
44 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
45 of
92)
91
Total Points Won
91
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 14 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 11 |
| 2:23:40 | Average Match Time | 2:23:40 |
| 63% (57/90) | 1st Serve % | 54% (50/92) |
| 63% (36/57) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (28/50) |
| 30% (10/33) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (19/42) |
| 57% (8/14) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 54% (7/13) |
| 49% (45/92) | Return Points Win % | 49% (44/90) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jubb vs Chung Match Preview :
- Jubb has demonstrated a stronger second serve, winning 46.67% of points as opposed to Chung's 39.62%. Does this give Jubb an edge in serve reliability? Likely yes.
- In returning games, Chung outperforms Jubb, claiming 46.79% of second serve return points compared to Jubb's 41.98%. Can this enhance Chung's competitiveness? It's a possibility.
- Both players have similar first-serve return stats, with Jubb at 30.25% and Chung at 30.4%, indicating comparable performance in this area.
- Under pressure, Jubb saves 57.79% of breakpoints while Chung saves 48.4%, hinting at Jubb's stronger resilience during crucial points.
- Chung boasts a better overall match-win percentage with 68.75% over the last year, surpassing Jubb's 47.92%.
- Jubb excels on clay with a career win rate of 72%, whereas Chung performs best on hard courts at 69%.
- Chung has been more successful in lower-level Futures/ITF tournaments, winning 77.42%, while Jubb has played primarily at higher-level Challengers/ITF events with a 35.71% win rate.
- Despite the higher win percentage, Chung's competition has been against players ranked on average lower at 365.17 than Jubb's opponents with an average rank of 261.48.
- Jubb shows strength in deciding sets, winning 50% of them, slightly outpacing Chung's 45% success rate.
- Chung boasts a slightly superior breakpoint conversion rate at 33.48% compared to Jubb's 31.86%.
Editorial Prediction (June 3, 2025, UTC):
This matchup presents an intriguing balance of strengths between Jubb and Chung. Jubb's stronger second serve performance may provide him with an advantage in sustaining service games under pressure. However, Chung's better percentage in returning against second serves indicates his potential to challenge Jubb's service games.
The mental toughness and ability to save breakpoints seem to favor Jubb, suggesting he might have a slight edge in critical moments during the match. On the other hand, Chung's higher match win percentage over the last year, despite facing lower-ranked competition, shows his consistency and ability to close matches effectively.
Considering the playing surfaces, Jubb's proficiency on clay surfaces might not play a significant role unless the current event's conditions favor clay-court tactics. Meanwhile, Chung's adaptability on hard courts could be beneficial, regardless of the court surface, especially if the event conditions align.
Factoring in all aspects, including the experience at different tournament levels and historical performance under pressure, Chung appears to have a slight edge overall. Despite Jubb's strengths, Chung's consistency and overall statistical performance suggest that he is more likely to come out victorious in this upcoming tennis match.
Jubb vs Chung Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Paul Jubb Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Eliot Spizzirri
Player
Paul Jubb
57%
(
58 of
101)
1st Serve %
55%
(
58 of
105)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
13
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
36 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
105)
111
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
Paul Jubb
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve %
69%
(
56 of
81)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Leandro Riedi
59%
(
54 of
92)
1st Serve %
63%
(
56 of
89)
2
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
6
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
40 of
56)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
32 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Giulio Zeppieri
Player
Paul Jubb
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Thiago Agustin Tirante
47%
(
26 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
6
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Paul Jubb
68%
(
77 of
114)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
88)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
40 of
61)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
42 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
109
Total Points Won
93
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
56%
(
45 of
81)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
4
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marin Cilic
Player
Paul Jubb
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
7
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
21 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Hyeon Chung Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexander Rozin
Player
Hyeon Chung
67%
(
57 of
85)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
80
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Garrett Johns
Player
Hyeon Chung
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve %
58%
(
50 of
86)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 2-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
74%
(
43 of
58)
3
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Benjamin Thomas George
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
0
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
45%
(
33 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Hyeon Chung
67%
(
72 of
108)
1st Serve %
47%
(
44 of
93)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
8
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
41%
(
44 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
105
Total Points Won
96
|
6-2 1-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Leo Vithoontien
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
7
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicolas Ian Kotzen
Player
Hyeon Chung
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
54%
(
51 of
94)
7
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
9
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
94)
97
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Bjorn Swenson
42%
(
22 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66% (231/117) | Win/Loss | 65% (285/152) |
| 63% (514/297) | Sets Win/Loss | 62% (653/397) |
| 55% (4254/3498) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (5275/4318) |
| 69% (122/54) | Hard Win/Loss | 68% (231/107) |
| 72% (57/22) | Clay Win/Loss | 59% (30/21) |
| 58% (30/22) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58% (22/16) |
| 54% (22/19) | Grass Win/Loss | 20% (2/8) |
| 0.29 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
| 1111 | Aces Total | 1218 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 1050 | Total Double Faults | 1112 |
| 1:36:59 | Average Match Time | 1:25:13 |
| 388.88 | Average Opponent Rank | 526.68 |
| 62% (14145/22806) | 1st Serve % | 62% (15667/25190) |
| 69% (9829/14145) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (11011/15667) |
| 52% (4534/8661) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (4816/9523) |
| 41% (1037/2506) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1276/2859) |
| 41% (9782/23704) | Return Points Win % | 42% (10919/26272) |
| 36% (5/9) | Slam W/L | 58% (22/16) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 52% (17/16) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 83% (10/2) |
| 63% (10/6) | Main Tour W/L | 56% (59/47) |
| 53% (66/59) | Challenger W/L | 68% (103/49) |
| 78% (150/43) | Futures W/L | 77% (74/22) |
| 67% (228/339) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 65% (254/391) |
| 20% (1/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 68% (28/41) |
| 59% (69/116) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (67/131) |
| 55% (62/112) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (69/121) |
| 90% (224/201) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (283/246) |
| 10% (224/22) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (283/37) |
| 24% (124/30) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (154/39) |
Jubb vs. Chung Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
