Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Paul Jubb vs Gerardo Lopez Villasenor Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Jubb vs Villasenor analysis and find out who is favored!
Paul Jubb vs Gerardo Lopez Villasenor Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jubb has won 53.83% of points on his second serve, while Villasenor has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jubb, in recent form, has won 51.88% of his opponent's second serve points, while Villasenor has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.72% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jubb has saved 61.71% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Villasenor has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jubb has won 67.74% of matches played (W/L 42/ 20), with Villasenor winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jubb has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 76% (W/L 51/ 16), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 45% (W/L 9/ 11). Villasenor has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Jubb has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 69.7% of matches (W/L 23/ 10), where as Villasenor has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jubb winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Jubb winning 2 and Villasenor winning 0. The last match between Jubb and Villasenor was at the M25 Harlingen, 12-11-2021, Quarterfinals, Hard with Paul Jubb getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:4:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Jubb and Villasenor have played a deciding set 0 times, with Jubb winning 0 times and Villasenor 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Jubb winning 1, and Villasenor 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jubb has played against opponents with an average rank of 292.4 while Villasenor has played against players with an average rank of 295.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jubb has won 41% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Villasenor has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jubb has converted 44.16% of breakpoint opportunities, and Villasenor has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Jubb 1 - 0 Villasenor
372
Rank
196
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
843
Rank
505
High
28
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
69% (189-83)
Career Total W/L
55% (109-88)
66% (19-10)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$54,540
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jubb VS Villasenor H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Paul Jubb | Gerardo Lopez Villasenor |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 14 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 8 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:4:0 | 2:4:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (42/69) | 68% (59/87) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (32/42) | 69% (41/59) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 74% (20/27) | 46% (13/28) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 15% (2/13) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (33/87) | 25% (17/69) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Jubb VS Villasenor H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 7-5 |
Stats 
Paul Jubb
Player
Gerardo Lopez Villasenor
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
59 of
87)
7
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
74%
(
20 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
17 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
87)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Paul Jubb | Gerardo Lopez Villasenor |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 66% (19/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (45/27) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (388/317) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 71% (10/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 69% (9/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.36 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 125 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 88 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:26 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 275.48 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1325/2158) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (957/1325) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 55% (457/833) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (96/234) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (955/2325) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 66% (19/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 66% (19/29) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (6/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (7/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (18/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (18/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 36% (11/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Paul Jubb Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Yunseong Chung
Player
Paul Jubb
51%
(
44 of
87)
1st Serve %
50%
(
39 of
78)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
31 of
39)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
26 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Egor Gerasimov
49%
(
36 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
96)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
48 of
96)
95
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Andrew Fenty
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
2
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
5
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Paul Jubb
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
55%
(
52 of
94)
11
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
94)
98
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
51 of
71)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Li Tu
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
75
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Fajing Sun
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Jea Moon Lee
61%
(
73 of
120)
1st Serve %
66%
(
69 of
104)
6
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
0
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
42 of
69)
53%
(
25 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
39%
(
47 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
104)
117
Total Points Won
107
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Varillas
Player
Paul Jubb
64%
(
62 of
97)
1st Serve %
67%
(
69 of
103)
5
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
35 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
103)
101
Total Points Won
99
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valerio Aboian
Player
Paul Jubb
63%
(
59 of
94)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
94
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Gerardo Lopez Villasenor Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Felix Corwin
Player
Gerardo Lopez Villasenor
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
92)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
92
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Carlos Manuel Aguilar
Player
Gerardo Lopez Villasenor
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve %
68%
(
68 of
100)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
27%
(
22 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
100)
103
Total Points Won
79
|
6-7(2) 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Gerardo Lopez Villasenor
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
15
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
24%
(
14 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ishaan Ravichander
Player
Gerardo Lopez Villasenor
63%
(
66 of
105)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
39%
(
41 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
24 of
74)
88
Total Points Won
91
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Peter Gojowczyk
Player
Gerardo Lopez Villasenor
46%
(
18 of
39)
1st Serve %
62%
(
23 of
37)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
50
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matias Franco Descotte
Player
Gerardo Lopez Villasenor
73%
(
66 of
90)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
102)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
53 of
66)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
26 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
102)
106
Total Points Won
86
|
6-7(2) 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Bertran
Player
Gerardo Lopez Villasenor
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
82
Total Points Won
63
|
3-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Gerardo Lopez Villasenor
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
59 of
87)
7
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
74%
(
20 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
17 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
87)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gerardo Lopez Villasenor
Player
Bruno Kuzuhara
65%
(
60 of
92)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
39 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
94
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gerardo Lopez Villasenor
Player
Noah Schachter
66%
(
71 of
107)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
42%
(
45 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
101
Total Points Won
92
|
6-2 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Jubb Vs Villasenor Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Paul Jubb
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
