M. S. (RUS)
To Win
P. Inchauspe
To Win
Paul Inchauspe vs Zura Tkemaladze Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W W W W W
Form
L L W L W L L W L LHead-To-Head: Inchauspe 1 - 0 Tkemaladze
They have played 2 sets in total, with Inchauspe winning 2 and Tkemaladze winning 0. The last match between Inchauspe and Tkemaladze was at the M15 Kayseri, 18-06-2025, Round: First, Surface: Hard, with Paul Inchauspe getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Paul Inchauspe | 1 |
| Zura Tkemaladze | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M15 Kayseri(18-06-2025)
Paul Inchauspe
Zura Tkemaladze
6
3
6
2
| Inchauspe | Stats | Tkemaladze |
|---|---|---|
| 94% (16-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 21% (3-11) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | 823 |
| Highest Rank | 633 | |
| 21 | Age | 25 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 1 | Titles | 1 |
| 62% (28-17) | Career Total W/L | 46% (124-148) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
- / Second
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Avanesyan VS Carle PREDICTION Clay
UniCredit Iasi Open - Iasi wta
16 Jul 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Jones VS Udvardy PREDICTION Clay
UniCredit Iasi Open - Iasi wta
17 Jul 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Inchauspe VS Tkemaladze H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Paul Inchauspe
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
45%
(
22 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
Inchauspe VS Tkemaladze H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:19:14 | Average Match Time | 1:19:14 |
| 45% (22/49) | 1st Serve % | 67% (34/51) |
| 86% (19/22) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (23/34) |
| 63% (17/27) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (7/17) |
| 100% (3/3) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 41% (21/51) | Return Points Win % | 27% (13/49) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Inchauspe vs Tkemaladze Match Preview :
- How do the players compare in second serve performance over the recent months? Tkemaladze secures 46.54% of points, whereas Inchauspe hasn't won any points, indicating a significant advantage for Tkemaladze.
- Regarding return game efforts, Tkemaladze has recently won 48.56% of points on opponents' second serves, contrasting sharply with Inchauspe’s 0% success rate. Could this disparity influence the match outcome?
- When evaluating first serve returns, Tkemaladze achieves a 26.02% success rate, while Inchauspe remains at 0%. This suggests a clear edge for Tkemaladze.
- Under pressure, Tkemaladze has managed to save 51.32% of breakpoints recently, compared to Inchauspe’s inability to save any breakpoints.
- In terms of match performance over the past year, Tkemaladze has a 40% win rate (16/24), while Inchauspe has a 50% win rate, albeit from just a single match.
- Considering surface preferences, Tkemaladze fares better on hard courts with a 51% win rate, as opposed to indoors hard with 31%. Inchauspe’s best surface is clay, where they achieve a 50% win rate.
- What about the level of competition they've faced? Tkemaladze's opponents had an average rank of 392.18, while Inchauspe faced tougher competition with an average rank of 163.5.
- In comparing player performance in deciding sets this year, Tkemaladze comes out ahead, winning 36% of these sets, while Inchauspe has not won any.
- Break point conversion highlights another contrast: Tkemaladze converts 42.86% of break opportunities, whereas Inchauspe converts none.
Editorial Prediction (June 17, 2025, UTC):
In any sporting contest, recent form and the ability to handle match pressure are crucial predictors of future victory. Tkemaladze's superior performance in second serve points, return games, and break point pressure situations suggests more sound tactical execution on court.
Although Inchauspe has a better win percentage over the last year, this statistic is based on a limited sample size of matches, indicating potential inconsistency against varying levels of competition. Inchauspe's faced opponents that are of a higher average rank, yet Tkemaladze’s comprehensive match stats nonetheless place him as the likely frontrunner.
Based on the analyses of key performance metrics and indications of in-match capabilities, Tkemaladze is most likely to triumph in the forthcoming tennis match. His all-around game appears more resilient and adept at translating pressure situations into opportunity, setting the stage for a likely victory.
Inchauspe vs Tkemaladze Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Paul Inchauspe Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Paul Inchauspe
Player
Louis Larue
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve %
56%
(
23 of
41)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
95%
(
20 of
21)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Paul Inchauspe
Player
Octave Caillat
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Paul Inchauspe
Player
Arda Azkara
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
81)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
6
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
81)
81
Total Points Won
66
|
3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Paul Inchauspe
Player
Constantin Bittoun Kouzmine
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
79)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
29%
(
22 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
79)
87
Total Points Won
67
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Paul Inchauspe
Player
Volodymyr Iakubenko
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Inchauspe
Player
Vadym Ursu
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Zura Tkemaladze Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mert Naci Turker
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
66%
(
65 of
98)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
10
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
13
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
39 of
55)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
36%
(
35 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
94)
104
Total Points Won
88
|
5-7 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zura Tkemaladze
Player
Ali Yazdani
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
75%
(
62 of
83)
3
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
6
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
21)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
48%
(
36 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
44 of
83)
83
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Inchauspe
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
45%
(
22 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Axel Nefve
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
64%
(
73 of
114)
1st Serve %
69%
(
75 of
108)
13
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
5
78%
(
57 of
73)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
54 of
75)
39%
(
16 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
41 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
36 of
108)
109
Total Points Won
113
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zura Tkemaladze
Player
Amir Milushev
51%
(
45 of
89)
1st Serve %
60%
(
60 of
100)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
9
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
59%
(
26 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
32 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
100)
99
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lorenzo Lorusso
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
74%
(
31 of
42)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
73%
(
8 of
11)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zura Tkemaladze
Player
Matteo Lavizzari
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
44%
(
39 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (28/17) | Win/Loss | 46% (124/148) |
| 62% (61/38) | Sets Win/Loss | 47% (290/328) |
| 56% (498/386) | Games Win/Loss | 49% (2826/2965) |
| 78% (14/4) | Hard Win/Loss | 50% (89/88) |
| 57% (12/9) | Clay Win/Loss | 38% (31/51) |
| 33% (2/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 31% (4/9) |
| 0.31 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 133 | Aces Total | 223 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 77 | Total Double Faults | 641 |
| 1:19:18 | Average Match Time | 1:26:45 |
| 368.27 | Average Opponent Rank | 413.92 |
| 58% (1329/2274) | 1st Serve % | 64% (9440/14673) |
| 71% (945/1329) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (5854/9440) |
| 49% (467/945) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (2532/5236) |
| 41% (104/252) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (668/1561) |
| 41% (974/2366) | Return Points Win % | 41% (5886/14285) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 14% (1/6) |
| 0% (0/2) | Challenger W/L | 37% (7/12) |
| 65% (28/15) | Futures W/L | 47% (116/130) |
| 62% (28/45) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 45% (119/264) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 80% (4/5) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (35/65) |
| 44% (4/9) | Deciding Set Win % | 42% (33/78) |
| 93% (27/25) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (142/113) |
| 7% (27/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (142/29) |
| 17% (18/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (130/10) |
Inchauspe vs. Tkemaladze Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
