Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Paul Goldstein vs German Puentes-Alcaniz Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Goldstein vs Puentes-Alcaniz analysis and find out who is favored!
Paul Goldstein vs German Puentes-Alcaniz Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Goldstein has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Puentes-Alcaniz has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Goldstein, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Puentes-Alcaniz has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Goldstein has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Puentes-Alcaniz has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Goldstein has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Puentes-Alcaniz winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Goldstein has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 221/ 148), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 47% (W/L 15/ 17). Puentes-Alcaniz has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 188/ 179), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 25% (W/L 3/ 9).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Goldstein winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Goldstein winning 3 and Puentes-Alcaniz winning 1. The last match between Goldstein and Puentes-Alcaniz was at the Australian Open - Melbourne, 15-01-2001, First, Hard with Paul Goldstein getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Goldstein and Puentes-Alcaniz have played a deciding set 0 times, with Goldstein winning 0 times and Puentes-Alcaniz 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Goldstein winning 0, and Puentes-Alcaniz 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Goldstein has played against opponents with an average rank of while Puentes-Alcaniz has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Goldstein has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Puentes-Alcaniz has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Goldstein has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Puentes-Alcaniz has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Goldstein 1 - 0 Puentes-Alcaniz
Ret.
Rank
58
High
47
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
350
High
51
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
57% (307-235)
Career Total W/L
50% (192-190)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$270,180
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Goldstein VS Puentes-Alcaniz H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Paul Goldstein | German Puentes-Alcaniz |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 1 |
| Games Won | 22 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Goldstein VS Puentes-Alcaniz H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-4 6-2 6-1 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Paul Goldstein | German Puentes-Alcaniz |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Paul Goldstein Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Sebastien Grosjean
Player
Paul Goldstein
43%
(
12 of
28)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
100%
(
12 of
12)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
52
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ernests Gulbis
Player
Paul Goldstein
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
56
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paul Goldstein
Player
Jan-Michael Gambill
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve %
38%
(
11 of
29)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
53%
(
10 of
19)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
8 of
11)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
53%
(
17 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
32
Total Points Won
29
|
5-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Radek Stepanek
Player
Paul Goldstein
72%
(
59 of
82)
1st Serve %
59%
(
52 of
88)
14
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
78%
(
46 of
59)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
25 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Goldstein
Player
Somdev Devvarman
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
1
Aces
6
9
Double Faults
6
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
44%
(
32 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hyung-Taik Lee
Player
Paul Goldstein
47%
(
22 of
47)
1st Serve %
45%
(
27 of
60)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Goldstein
Player
Robert Kendrick
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
7
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
James Blake
Player
Paul Goldstein
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
81)
12
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
31 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
81)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
6-0 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Goldstein
Player
Adrian Garcia
74%
(
73 of
99)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
90)
1
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
37%
(
37 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
90)
99
Total Points Won
90
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
German Puentes-Alcaniz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF | 3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-5 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Goldstein Vs Puentes-Alcaniz Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
