Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Paul Barbier Gazeu vs Matic Kriznik Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gazeu vs Kriznik analysis and find out who is favored!
Paul Barbier Gazeu vs Matic Kriznik Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gazeu has won 47.92% of points on his second serve, while Kriznik has won 50.52%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gazeu, in recent form, has won 45.89% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kriznik has won 50.51%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.41% and 30.17% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gazeu has saved 49.21% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kriznik has saved 55.28% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gazeu has won 28.57% of matches played (W/L 4/ 10), with Kriznik winning 33.33% (W/L 7/ 14) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gazeu has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 18% (W/L 2/ 9). Kriznik has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 25% (W/L 2/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Gazeu has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 28.57% of matches (W/L 4/ 10), where as Kriznik has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 7/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gazeu has played against opponents with an average rank of 46.43 while Kriznik has played against players with an average rank of 223.38.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gazeu has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kriznik has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gazeu has converted 44.68% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kriznik has converted 49.48% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gazeu 0 - 0 Kriznik
N/A
Rank
High
18
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
18
Age
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
Form
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
23% (5-17)
Career Total W/L
31% (9-20)
38% (3-5)
YTD W/L
22% (2-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Paul Barbier Gazeu | Matic Kriznik |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 38% (3/5) | 22% (2/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 44% (8/10) | 33% (7/14) |
| Games Win/Loss | 45% (76/92) | 44% (84/107) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) | 25% (2/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.19 | 0.29 |
| Aces Total | 15 | 27 |
| DFs per game | 0.32 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 26 | 22 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:26:37 | 1:50:33 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 81.25 | 152.44 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (308/484) | 59% (336/574) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (200/308) | 67% (226/336) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (85/176) | 47% (113/238) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (17/41) | 50% (20/40) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (177/477) | 37% (222/603) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 38% (3/5) | 22% (2/7) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 38% (3/8) | 22% (2/9) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 60% (5/3) | 67% (3/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 40% (5/2) | 33% (3/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 0% (6/0) |
Paul Barbier Gazeu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Paul Barbier Gazeu
Player
Stefan Vujic
67%
(
58 of
86)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
1
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
7
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
22 of
72)
82
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maxence Beauge
Player
Paul Barbier Gazeu
60%
(
53 of
89)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
65)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
24 of
31)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
5-7 6-2 10-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paul Barbier Gazeu
Player
Antoine Berger
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
86%
(
12 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Knaff
Player
Paul Barbier Gazeu
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
9
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
15 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
80
Total Points Won
53
|
4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bruno Pujol Navarro
Player
Paul Barbier Gazeu
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
17 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
55
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Constantin Bittoun Kouzmine
Player
Paul Barbier Gazeu
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christoph Negritu
Player
Paul Barbier Gazeu
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Barbier Gazeu
Player
Samir Hamza Reguig
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
75%
(
47 of
63)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
45%
(
26 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
40 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maximus Jones
Player
Paul Barbier Gazeu
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
81)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
81)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Robin Bertrand
Player
Paul Barbier Gazeu
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Matic Kriznik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Saveliy Ivanov
Player
Matic Kriznik
44%
(
35 of
79)
1st Serve %
48%
(
38 of
79)
6
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
39%
(
17 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
43 of
79)
89
Total Points Won
69
|
6-1 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Massimo Giunta
Player
Matic Kriznik
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
51%
(
27 of
53)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Fabrizio Andaloro
Player
Matic Kriznik
60%
(
58 of
96)
1st Serve %
71%
(
79 of
111)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
48 of
79)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
43%
(
41 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
111)
102
Total Points Won
105
|
4-6 7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matic Kriznik
Player
Jordan Chiu
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christoph Negritu
Player
Matic Kriznik
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Matic Kriznik
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matic Kriznik
Player
Chanon Phunsawat
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tsung-Hao Huang
Player
Matic Kriznik
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
7
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
34%
(
32 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
22 of
68)
85
Total Points Won
78
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Castelnuovo
Player
Matic Kriznik
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
12
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
18 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
17 of
49)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alex Knaff
Player
Matic Kriznik
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
19%
(
9 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Gazeu Vs Kriznik Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Paul Barbier Gazeu
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
