Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Patrik Rikl vs Evan Furness Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Rikl vs Furness analysis and find out who is favored!
Patrik Rikl vs Evan Furness Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Rikl has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Furness has won 45.89%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Rikl, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Furness has won 51.94%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 37.85% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Rikl has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Furness has saved 53.5% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Rikl has won 66.67% of matches played (W/L 16/ 8), with Furness winning 50% (W/L 12/ 12) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Rikl has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 26/ 13), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Furness has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 72% (W/L 84/ 32), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Rikl has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 77.78% of matches (W/L 14/ 4), where as Furness has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 6/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Rikl winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Rikl winning 2 and Furness winning 0. The last match between Rikl and Furness was at the M25+H Jablonec Nad Nisou, 24-05-2019, Quarterfinals, Clay with Patrik Rikl getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:34:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Rikl and Furness have played a deciding set 0 times, with Rikl winning 0 times and Furness 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Rikl winning 1, and Furness 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Rikl has played against opponents with an average rank of 182.13 while Furness has played against players with an average rank of 200.46.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Rikl has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Furness has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Rikl has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Furness has converted 49.02% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Rikl 1 - 0 Furness
710
Rank
392
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
823
Rank
197
High
25
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
62% (139-87)
Career Total W/L
59% (287-199)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
52% (11-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$5,730
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Patrik Rikl | Evan Furness |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:34:0 | 1:34:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (38/62) | 55% (38/69) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 82% (31/38) | 68% (26/38) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 63% (15/24) | 55% (17/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (26/69) | 26% (16/62) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 6-2 |
Stats 
Patrik Rikl
Player
Evan Furness
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Patrik Rikl | Evan Furness |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 52% (11/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 53% (24/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (211/209) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (5/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.21 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 43 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.36 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 74 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:37:54 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 218.76 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 60% (855/1415) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 63% (541/855) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 46% (257/560) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 49% (75/153) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 43% (589/1364) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 56% (5/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (6/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 53% (10/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 92% (12/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 8% (12/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (9/0) |
Patrik Rikl Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF | 3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Constantin Bittoun Kouzmine
Player
Patrik Rikl
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
48%
(
20 of
42)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
52
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Patrik Rikl
Player
Andrew Paulson
68%
(
68 of
100)
1st Serve %
53%
(
59 of
112)
14
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
5
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
43 of
59)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
32 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
38 of
112)
106
Total Points Won
106
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Patrik Rikl
Player
Vladyslav Orlov
51%
(
29 of
57)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrik Rikl
Player
Lukas Palovic
50%
(
7 of
14)
1st Serve %
45%
(
10 of
22)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
100%
(
7 of
7)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Rtn Points Won
77%
(
17 of
22)
29
Total Points Won
7
|
6-0 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrik Rikl
Player
Jiri Barnat
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrik Rikl
Player
Fryderyk Lechno-Wasiutynski
46%
(
19 of
41)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
100%
(
19 of
19)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jiri Jenicek
Player
Patrik Rikl
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
1
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-0 3-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
view more
Evan Furness Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Edas Butvilas
Player
Evan Furness
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Johan Nikles
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucas Gerch
Player
Evan Furness
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefano Napolitano
Player
Evan Furness
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
1
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
4
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
50%
(
27 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
50
Total Points Won
48
|
7-6(7) ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Tristan Lamasine
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jozef Kovalik
Player
Evan Furness
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Eric Vanshelboim
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve %
81%
(
54 of
67)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
38 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Nikola Milojevic
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Evan Furness
70%
(
79 of
113)
1st Serve %
64%
(
74 of
115)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
75%
(
59 of
79)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
45 of
74)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
42 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
51 of
115)
122
Total Points Won
106
|
6-1 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Rikl Vs Furness Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Evan Furness
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
