Patrik Hartmeier vs James Mackinlay Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hartmeier vs Mackinlay analysis and find out who is favored!
Patrik Hartmeier vs James Mackinlay Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hartmeier has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Mackinlay has won 44.98%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hartmeier, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Mackinlay has won 47.28%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 29.38% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hartmeier has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mackinlay has saved 56.6% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hartmeier has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Mackinlay winning 47.06% (W/L 8/ 9) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hartmeier has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 12/ 12), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 36% (W/L 5/ 9). Mackinlay has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hartmeier winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Hartmeier winning 2 and Mackinlay winning 1. The last match between Hartmeier and Mackinlay was at the M25 Sunderland, 08-04-2019, Q1 round, I.hard with Patrik Hartmeier getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:53:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hartmeier and Mackinlay have played a deciding set 1 times, with Hartmeier winning 1 times and Mackinlay 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hartmeier winning 0, and Mackinlay 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hartmeier has played against opponents with an average rank of while Mackinlay has played against players with an average rank of 51.65.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hartmeier has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mackinlay has won 80% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hartmeier has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mackinlay has converted 33.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hartmeier 1 - 0 Mackinlay
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
High
27
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
43% (43-58)
Career Total W/L
35% (13-24)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-2)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Patrik Hartmeier | James Mackinlay |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 20 | 19 |
Aces (Total) | 2 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 4 | 10 |
Avg Match Time | 1:53:0 | 1:53:0 |
1st Serve % | 64% (54/84) | 45% (40/88) |
1st Serve Win% | 57% (31/54) | 68% (27/40) |
2nd Serve Win% | 53% (16/30) | 48% (23/48) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 43% (3/7) |
Return Points W% | 43% (38/88) | 44% (37/84) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 3-6 10-8 |
Patrik Hartmeier
Player
James Mackinlay
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
45%
(
40 of
88)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
10
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
37 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
85
Total Points Won
87
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Patrik Hartmeier | James Mackinlay |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 20% (1/4) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 38% (21/34) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.3 |
Aces Total | 0 | 8 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.11 |
DFs Total | 0 | 3 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 59% (39/66) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 69% (27/39) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 48% (13/27) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 29% (2/7) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 36% (27/75) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Patrik Hartmeier Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | 6-1 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF |
Patrik Hartmeier
Player
Luc Hoeijmans
40%
(
31 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
54%
(
25 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
70
|
3-6 6-3 10-7 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Patrik Hartmeier
Player
Jip Van Assendelft
52%
(
45 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
7
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
8
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 4-6 6-1 13-11 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 1-6 6-3 10-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Milan Welte
Player
Patrik Hartmeier
53%
(
50 of
94)
1st Serve %
54%
(
40 of
74)
1
Aces
7
9
Double Faults
3
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
31 of
40)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
0%
(
0 of
1)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
26 of
74)
82
Total Points Won
86
|
2-6 7-6(3) 10-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Raphael Baltensperger
Player
Patrik Hartmeier
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more
James Mackinlay Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-0 5-7 10-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Harry Wendelken
Player
James Mackinlay
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
3
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Cox
Player
James Mackinlay
48%
(
19 of
40)
1st Serve %
68%
(
26 of
38)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
James Mackinlay
Player
Siim Troost
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
1
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
3
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
47%
(
35 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
70
|
5-7 6-4 11-9 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
James Mackinlay
Player
David Stevenson
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
6
Aces
16
4
Double Faults
5
86%
(
49 of
57)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
39 of
48)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
24 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
23 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(5) 6-7(4) 10-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Phoenix Weir
Player
James Mackinlay
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
70
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
James Mackinlay
Player
Ioannis Stamatopoulos
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Phoenix Weir
Player
James Mackinlay
65%
(
74 of
113)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
97)
10
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
40%
(
45 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
110
Total Points Won
100
|
7-6(6) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
James Mackinlay
Player
Francesco Paschetto
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
55%
(
40 of
73)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
11
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Martim Simoes
Player
James Mackinlay
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
94%
(
30 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
29%
(
2 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H |
view more