Patrik Fabian vs Robin Stanek Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L W W W L W L
Form
L W L W W W L W W LHead-To-Head: Fabian 1 - 2 Stanek
They have played 7 sets in total, with Fabian winning 2 and Stanek winning 5. The last match between Fabian and Stanek was at the Bratislava Challenger, 05-11-2016, Round: Q1 round, Surface: I.hard, with Patrik Fabian getting the victory 3-6 6-3 7-6(5).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Patrik Fabian | 1 |
| Robin Stanek | 2 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Bratislava Challenger(05-11-2016)
Patrik Fabian
Robin Stanek
3
6
6
3
7
6
| Fabian | Stats | Stanek |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 548 | Highest Rank | 258 |
| 31 | Age | 30 |
| L | Plays | L |
| 1 | Titles | 3 |
| 55% (140-114) | Career Total W/L | 56% (246-192) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Tiffon VS Wong PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
23 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Alves VS Meza PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
23 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-3 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Patrik Fabian
Player
Robin Stanek
74%
(
64 of
87)
1st Serve %
78%
(
73 of
93)
11
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
49 of
64)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
52 of
73)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
26 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
29 of
93)
90
Total Points Won
90
|
||||
| 6-3 7-5 | |||||
| 6-3 6-2 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 5 |
| 29 | Games Won | 40 |
| 11 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 0:34:7 | Average Match Time | 0:34:7 |
| 74% (64/87) | 1st Serve % | 78% (73/93) |
| 77% (49/64) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (52/73) |
| 52% (12/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 60% (12/20) |
| 50% (2/4) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 67% (2/3) |
| 31% (29/93) | Return Points Win % | 30% (26/87) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 67% (3/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 33% (3/1) |
| 33% (3/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Patrik Fabian Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Alexander Lazov
Player
Patrik Fabian
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve %
52%
(
13 of
25)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
10 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
39
Total Points Won
19
|
6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrik Fabian
Player
Matvey Khomentovskiy
45%
(
18 of
40)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
7
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
45 of
85)
74
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Benjamin Lock
Player
Patrik Fabian
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
2
Aces
5
-
Double Faults
-
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrik Fabian
Player
Claudio Fortuna
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
74%
(
46 of
62)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrik Fabian
Player
Conor Berg
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
59%
(
57 of
97)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
92
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(6) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrik Fabian
Player
Marsel Ilhan
78%
(
46 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
6
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
14 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
19 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Patrik Fabian
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
12
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
2
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Egor Gerasimov
Player
Patrik Fabian
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Robin Stanek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Eric Vanshelboim
Player
Robin Stanek
72%
(
87 of
121)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
102)
6
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
2
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
39%
(
47 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
102)
116
Total Points Won
107
|
6-7(2) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Robin Stanek
Player
Milan Welte
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
17 of
46)
54
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robin Stanek
Player
Jan Satral
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve %
56%
(
20 of
36)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
15 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
7 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
42
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Zsombor Piros
Player
Robin Stanek
56%
(
9 of
16)
1st Serve %
81%
(
13 of
16)
5
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
89%
(
8 of
9)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
22
Total Points Won
10
|
5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Robin Stanek
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Robin Stanek
Player
Kaichi Uchida
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robin Stanek
Player
Matyas Cerny
59%
(
55 of
94)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
89)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
102
Total Points Won
81
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefan Palosi
Player
Robin Stanek
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
84%
(
58 of
69)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (140/114) | Win/Loss | 56% (246/192) |
| 56% (313/250) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (550/435) |
| 53% (2792/2483) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (4898/4449) |
| 63% (55/33) | Hard Win/Loss | 69% (79/36) |
| 50% (61/61) | Clay Win/Loss | 50% (111/111) |
| 55% (23/19) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55% (56/45) |
| 50% (1/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
| 381 | Aces Total | 892 |
| 0.07 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 188 | Total Double Faults | 555 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 567.38 | Average Opponent Rank | 594.33 |
| 63% (3462/5500) | 1st Serve % | 64% (11518/18132) |
| 71% (2461/3462) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (7908/11518) |
| 50% (1012/2038) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (3349/6614) |
| 41% (237/576) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (748/1750) |
| 39% (2262/5757) | Return Points Win % | 40% (7387/18693) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 35% (9/17) | Challenger W/L | 46% (41/49) |
| 57% (131/97) | Futures W/L | 59% (205/142) |
| 55% (139/252) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (240/423) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 46% (36/78) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (75/131) |
| 40% (23/57) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (57/120) |
| 86% (151/130) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (249/214) |
| 14% (151/21) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (249/34) |
| 10% (103/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (188/30) |
Fabian vs. Stanek Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
