Patrik Fabian vs Isak Arvidsson Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L W W W L W L
Form
W L L L L W W W L LHead To Head: Fabian 1 - 0 Arvidsson
They have played 3 sets in total, with Fabian winning 2 and Arvidsson winning 1. The last match between Fabian and Arvidsson was at the Bratislava Challenger, 06-11-2016, Round: Q3, Surface: I.hard, with Patrik Fabian getting the victory 6-7(5) 6-4 7-6(4).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Patrik Fabian | 1 |
| Isak Arvidsson | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Bratislava Challenger(06-11-2016)
Patrik Fabian
Isak Arvidsson
6
7
6
4
7
6
| Fabian | Stats | Arvidsson |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 548 | Highest Rank | 489 |
| 31 | Age | 32 |
| L | Plays | R |
| 1 | Titles | 4 |
| 55% (140-114) | Career Total W/L | 57% (163-123) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $3,985 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Diallo VS Humbert PREDICTION Grass
Libema Open - 's-Hertogenbosch atp
14 Jun 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Hanfmann VS Nishioka PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
14 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(5) 6-4 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Patrik Fabian
Player
Isak Arvidsson
76%
(
74 of
98)
1st Serve %
68%
(
80 of
117)
15
Aces
16
0
Double Faults
4
84%
(
62 of
74)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
63 of
80)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
23%
(
23 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
37 of
117)
112
Total Points Won
103
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 19 | Games Won | 17 |
| 15 | Aces (Total) | 16 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:11:41 | Average Match Time | 2:11:41 |
| 76% (74/98) | 1st Serve % | 68% (80/117) |
| 84% (62/74) | 1st Serve Win % | 79% (63/80) |
| 54% (13/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (17/37) |
| 50% (2/4) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (1/4) |
| 32% (37/117) | Return Points Win % | 23% (23/98) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 50% (1/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Patrik Fabian Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Alexander Lazov
Player
Patrik Fabian
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve %
52%
(
13 of
25)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
10 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
39
Total Points Won
19
|
6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrik Fabian
Player
Matvey Khomentovskiy
45%
(
18 of
40)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
7
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
45 of
85)
74
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Benjamin Lock
Player
Patrik Fabian
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
2
Aces
5
-
Double Faults
-
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrik Fabian
Player
Claudio Fortuna
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
74%
(
46 of
62)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrik Fabian
Player
Conor Berg
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
59%
(
57 of
97)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
92
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(6) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrik Fabian
Player
Marsel Ilhan
78%
(
46 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
6
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
14 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
19 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Patrik Fabian
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
12
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
2
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Egor Gerasimov
Player
Patrik Fabian
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Isak Arvidsson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Paul-Henri Mathieu
Player
Isak Arvidsson
43%
(
20 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Renzo Olivo
Player
Isak Arvidsson
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
57 of
85)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
43 of
57)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
85)
81
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Isak Arvidsson
Player
Vaclav Safranek
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Isak Arvidsson
Player
Christian Samuelsson
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
52%
(
50 of
96)
11
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
8
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
38 of
50)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
22 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
96)
97
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Isak Arvidsson
Player
Filip Bergevi
64%
(
58 of
90)
1st Serve %
50%
(
44 of
88)
12
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
26 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(5) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Toshihide Matsui
Player
Isak Arvidsson
69%
(
88 of
127)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
8
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
7
63%
(
55 of
88)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
44 of
58)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
39%
(
50 of
127)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
95)
113
Total Points Won
109
|
6-7(4) 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Isak Arvidsson
53%
(
31 of
58)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christian Lindell
Player
Isak Arvidsson
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (140/114) | Win/Loss | 57% (163/123) |
| 56% (313/250) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (369/297) |
| 53% (2792/2483) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (3342/3006) |
| 63% (55/33) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (19/13) |
| 50% (61/61) | Clay Win/Loss | 56% (90/70) |
| 55% (23/19) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (54/40) |
| 50% (1/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 |
| 381 | Aces Total | 756 |
| 0.07 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 188 | Total Double Faults | 430 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 566.74 | Average Opponent Rank | 620.34 |
| 63% (3462/5500) | 1st Serve % | 61% (5401/8853) |
| 71% (2461/3462) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (3837/5401) |
| 50% (1012/2038) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (1716/3452) |
| 41% (237/576) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (345/830) |
| 39% (2262/5757) | Return Points Win % | 39% (3393/8733) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 20% (2/8) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 41% (7/10) |
| 35% (9/17) | Challenger W/L | 47% (21/24) |
| 57% (131/97) | Futures W/L | 62% (133/81) |
| 55% (139/252) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (158/275) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 25% (2/8) |
| 46% (36/78) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (48/99) |
| 40% (23/57) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (43/87) |
| 86% (151/130) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (163/138) |
| 14% (151/21) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (163/25) |
| 10% (103/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (123/25) |
Fabian vs. Arvidsson Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
