Patrick Zahraj vs Vignesh Gogineni Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 06 Nov at 07:28 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
P. Zahraj vs V. Gogineni

GER
0
Win
Played
1
Win

USA
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Zahraj 0 - 1 Gogineni
They have played 2 sets in total, with Patrick Zahraj winning 0 and Vignesh Gogineni winning 2. The last match between Vignesh Gogineni and Patrick Zahraj was at the M25 East Lansing, 06-11-2025, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Vignesh Gogineni getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Zahraj | 0 |
| Gogineni | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M25 East Lansing(11-06-25)
P. Zahraj vs V. Gogineni H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $10,645 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 56.18% (150-117) | Career Total W/L | 69.23% (9-4) |
| 0 | Indoor | 1 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0.00% (0-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
P. Zahraj vs V. Gogineni Match Preview:
- Second serve performance: Patrick Zahraj has a second serve win rate of 41.34% compared to Vignesh Gogineni's 42.24% in recent months. Is it significant? Yes, as it correlates well with match outcomes.
- Return game strength: Zahraj wins 45.37% of points on opponents’ second serves, whereas Gogineni captures 46.67%, giving Gogineni a slight edge in returning.
- First serve return prowess: Zahraj's ability to return first serves stands at 25.19%, falling short of Gogineni’s 32.03%.
- Handling breakpoints: Zahraj saves breakpoints at a rate of 58.50%, notably higher than Gogineni's 40.48%, offering Zahraj resilience under pressure.
- Overall match success: Over the past year, Zahraj has a 53.75% win rate, while Gogineni has a stronger 70.00% success rate.
- Favorite surface: Both players excel on indoor hard courts, with each winning 63% of matches; however, Gogineni holds a better hard court record.
- Playing level: Zahraj frequently competes in higher-level Challengers/ITF events, winning 55.36%, compared to Gogineni’s 70% in Futures tournaments.
- Quality of opponents: Zahraj has faced tougher competition with opponents averaging a rank of 340.45, while Gogineni’s opponents average 260.7, possibly impacting Zahraj's match outcomes.
- Deciding sets: Zahraj edges Gogineni with a 52% win rate in deciding sets versus Gogineni’s 50%, suggesting a slight advantage in crucial moments.
Editorial Prediction (November 6, 2025, UTC):
Considering second serve and return game performance, Vignesh Gogineni holds a slight statistical edge, indicating his higher proficiency in returning serves might play a crucial role in a competitive match.
Nevertheless, Patrick Zahraj's ability to save breakpoints and experience against higher-ranked opponents signify his resilience and tactical grasp, especially when under pressure.
Despite Zahraj's exposure to higher-level competition, Gogineni's consistent performance and recent win rate suggest better overall momentum and confidence leading into the match.
Given these insights, Vignesh Gogineni is the likely favorite to prevail in this upcoming encounter, leveraging his minor advantages in return statistics and overall match success.
Patrick Zahraj vs Vignesh Gogineni Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
P. Zahraj vs V. Gogineni H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 7 | Games Won | 12 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:38:5 | Average Match Time | 1:38:5 |
| 52% (32/61) | 1st Serve % | 65% (37/57) |
| 53% (17/32) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (22/37) |
| 41% (12/29) | 2nd Serve Win % | 60% (12/20) |
| 38% (3/8) | Break Pts Won % | 63% (5/8) |
| 40% (23/57) | Return Points Win % | 52% (32/61) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
P. Zahraj Recent Matches Played
V. Gogineni Recent Matches Played

P. Zahraj vs V. Gogineni Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.18% (150/117) | YTD Win/Loss | 69.23% (9/4) |
| 55.15% (332/270) | Sets Win/Loss | 68.97% (20/9) |
| 52.14% (2991/2746) | Games Win/Loss | 55.76% (150/119) |
| 52.78% (19/17) | Hard Win/Loss | 66.67% (6/3) |
| 53.44% (70/61) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 61.54% (56/35) | Indoor Hard W/L | 75.00% (3/1) |
| 55.56% (5/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.34 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 967 | Aces Total | 20 |
| 0.36 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 1009 | Total Double Faults | 15 |
| 1:30:19 | Average Match Time | 1:12:54 |
| 375.71 | Average Opponent Rank | 318.31 |
| 61% (9352/15275) | 1st Serve % | 64% (385/601) |
| 69% (6427/9352) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (251/385) |
| 45% (2644/5923) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (116/216) |
| 43% (714/1677) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (33/66) |
| 42% (6473/15557) | Return Points Win % | 45% (272/611) |
| 30.00% (3/7) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52.70% (39/35) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 59.02% (108/75) | Futures W/L | 69.23% (9/4) |
| 57% (148/261) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 75% (9/12) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (40/74) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (2/2) |
| 54% (39/72) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (2/4) |
| 86% (148/128) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (10/8) |
| 13% (148/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (10/2) |
| 18% (119/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 33% (3/1) |