H. Mayot
To Win
E. Butvilas
To Win
Patrick Zahraj vs Harold Mayot Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L W L W W W L
Form
L L L L W W L L W LHead-to-head: Zahraj 1 - 0 Mayot
They have played 2 sets in total, with Zahraj winning 2 and Mayot winning 0. The last match between Zahraj and Mayot was at the Pau Challenger, 19-02-2025, Second, I.hard with Patrick Zahraj getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
Pau Challenger(19-02-2025)
6
2
6
4
Upcoming Match
- / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Draper VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
15 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Andreeva PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells wta
15 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Harold Mayot
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
6
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
0
12
Games Won
6
6
Aces (Total)
5
0
Total Double Faults
0
1:18:56
Average Match Time
1:18:56
58% (28/48)
1st Serve %
68% (36/53)
79% (22/28)
1st Serve Win %
56% (20/36)
50% (10/20)
2nd Serve Win %
41% (7/17)
71% (5/7)
Break Points Won % (Total)
67% (2/3)
49% (26/53)
Return Points Win %
33% (16/48)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Patrick Zahraj vs Harold Mayot Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Patrick Zahraj 1 - 0 Harold Mayot
Recent form analysis: In the last six months, Zahraj has maintained an impressive second serve performance, securing victories in 43.84% of points. On the other hand, Mayot has exhibited even greater proficiency, triumphing in 50.79% of such points. This particular statistic holds significant importance as it correlates strongly with the accuracy of match predictions.
Return game assessment: Recent return game statistics reveal that Zahraj has excelled in winning 54.71% of points off their opponent's second serve. In comparison, Mayot has achieved a success rate of 50.4% in this aspect. Furthermore, Zahraj has outperformed Mayot in first serve returns, with percentages of 37.14% and 30.94% respectively. This data significantly aids in determining the favorite in this forthcoming head-to-head encounter.
Under pressure analysis: When it comes to saving crucial breakpoints, Zahraj has demonstrated admirable resilience, successfully saving 57.99% of them in recent matches. Conversely, Mayot has showcased an impressive ability to handle pressure, saving 60.3% of breakpoints. Keen observers acknowledge the relevance of this statistic in making in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the past year, Zahraj has garnered victory in an impressive 58.75% of matches played, boasting a solid win-loss record of 47 wins and 33 losses. Mayot, while slightly behind, has still achieved a commendable win percentage of 51.9% with a win-loss record of 41 wins and 38 losses. Taking these statistics into account provides a comprehensive prediction overview for their head-to-head clash.
Surface specialization: Zahraj has displayed exceptional proficiency on I.hard courts, securing a remarkable 65% win rate, tallying 34 wins and 18 losses. Comparatively, their performance on Hard courts has been slightly weaker, with a win percentage of 53% (19 wins and 17 losses). Mayot has excelled on Grass courts, boasting a 64% win rate (9 wins and 5 losses). Interestingly, their least successful surface is I.hard, where they have secured victories in 52% of matches (54 wins and 50 losses).
Player level distinction: In the preceding year, Zahraj has predominantly participated in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a $10K prize, registering success in 56.52% of matches (26 wins and 20 losses). In contrast, Mayot has primarily competed in Challengers and ITF tournaments with prize pools exceeding $10K, attaining victory in 59.57% of matches (28 wins and 19 losses). It is vital to consider the level of events at which players have competed when comparing their respective statistics to predict favorites.
Opponent quality assessment: Over the course of the past twelve months, Zahraj has faced opponents with an average ranking of 427.39. In contrast, Mayot has confronted rivals with an average ranking of 182.85. This information sheds light on the caliber of opponents both players have encountered and aids in evaluating their respective performances.
Deciding set proficiency: For those interested in live predictions and betting strategies, it is pertinent to note that if this match extends to a deciding set, Zahraj has a remarkable track record, emerging victorious in 71% of deciding sets during the past year. Mayot, while still formidable, has secured victory in 35% of deciding sets across all tour matches.
Current event head-to-head statistics: While historical player performance holds value in predicting tennis matches, it is essential to also consider current event statistics to ascertain players in top form. Analyzing the section below, which showcases their performance in the ongoing event, provides a more comprehensive assessment. Additionally, it is worth noting that certain players thrive in specific tournaments, hence necessitating their performance at the event to be taken into account when predicting the outcome.
Break point conversion: Recent form showcases Zahraj's remarkable ability to convert breakpoint opportunities, successfully capitalizing on 43.14% of such chances. Mayot, while slightly trailing, has also showcased considerable prowess, converting 41.28% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. This statistic proves invaluable for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
If you have an interest in models that predict tennis matches, you may find this article of notable relevance (Warning: Intended for the stats geeks among us).
Patrick Zahraj Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Jelle Sels
Player
Patrick Zahraj
73%
(
74 of
101)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
90)
8
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
54 of
74)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
43 of
59)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
37 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
100
Total Points Won
91
|
6-3 6-7(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Arthur Fery
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Mae Malige
63%
(
69 of
110)
1st Serve %
60%
(
51 of
85)
7
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
44%
(
48 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
100
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Alexey Vatutin
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tom Gentzsch
Player
Patrick Zahraj
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Maxence Beauge
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
55 of
81)
8
Aces
11
5
Double Faults
2
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
43 of
55)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
20 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
24 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(2) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Patrick Zahraj
70%
(
57 of
81)
1st Serve %
58%
(
61 of
106)
7
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
7
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
48 of
61)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
45)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
22 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
106)
101
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 6-7(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Patrick Zahraj
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Lukas Klein
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
9
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
3
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Arthur Fery
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
67%
(
61 of
91)
13
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
0
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
25 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
91)
92
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Harold Mayot Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Harold Mayot
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
6
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
Jie Cui
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
72%
(
44 of
61)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Harold Mayot
46%
(
55 of
119)
1st Serve %
59%
(
58 of
99)
16
Aces
6
13
Double Faults
2
82%
(
45 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
39%
(
25 of
64)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
41%
(
49 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
99)
110
Total Points Won
108
|
2-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
Harold Mayot
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
12 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
Mikhail Kukushkin
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
Michael Vrbensky
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Harold Mayot
58%
(
61 of
106)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
16
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
1
79%
(
48 of
61)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
41 of
51)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
35%
(
37 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
23 of
75)
92
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(2) 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benoit Paire
Player
Harold Mayot
56%
(
49 of
87)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
10
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
6-2 1-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Harold Mayot
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
82
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Joao Fonseca
Player
Harold Mayot
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
9
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
59% (129/91)
Win/Loss
54% (165/141)
57% (284/213)
Sets Win/Loss
53% (375/327)
53% (2499/2219)
Games Win/Loss
52% (3467/3250)
53% (19/17)
Hard Win/Loss
55% (45/37)
57% (61/46)
Clay Win/Loss
54% (51/44)
64% (49/28)
Indoor Hard W/L
52% (60/55)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
64% (9/5)
0.32
Aces Per Game
0.44
734
Aces Total
1443
0.36
Double Faults Per Game
0.24
822
Total Double Faults
786
1:26:48
Average Match Time
1:38:24
363.56
Average Opponent Rank
367.75
62% (7477/12015)
1st Serve %
61% (13010/21226)
68% (5104/7477)
1st Serve Win %
69% (9038/13010)
45% (2026/4538)
2nd Serve Win %
50% (4136/8216)
43% (584/1355)
Break Points Won % (Total)
43% (865/2035)
42% (5199/12259)
Return Points Win %
39% (8198/21079)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
41% (7/10)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
40% (4/6)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
47% (15/17)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
60% (28/19)
Challenger W/L
55% (90/75)
58% (101/72)
Futures W/L
60% (49/33)
59% (128/217)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
55% (157/287)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
38% (3/8)
55% (31/56)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
42% (41/98)
55% (33/60)
Deciding Set Win %
49% (45/92)
87% (126/110)
1st Set Won, Won Match
89% (156/139)
13% (126/16)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
11% (156/17)
20% (94/19)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
16% (150/24)
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Harold Mayot
View full predicted draw for Mayot
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
