Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Patrick Rafter vs Martin Damm Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Rafter vs Damm analysis and find out who is favored!
Patrick Rafter vs Martin Damm Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Rafter has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Damm has won 49.95%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Rafter, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Damm has won 45.64%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 25.39% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Rafter has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Damm has saved 71.51% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Rafter has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Damm winning 65.52% (W/L 57/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Rafter has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 75% (W/L 74/ 25), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 28/ 30). Damm has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 63/ 40), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 42/ 38).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Rafter has played against opponents with an average rank of while Damm has played against players with an average rank of 262.22.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Rafter has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Damm has won 55% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Rafter has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Damm has converted 37.32% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Rafter 0 - 0 Damm
Ret.
Rank
High
51
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
177
Rank
175
High
20
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
65% (347-184)
Career Total W/L
57% (135-100)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
58% (14-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$107,985
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Patrick Rafter | Martin Damm |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 58% (14/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 52% (29/27) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 51% (300/292) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (6/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 64% (7/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 1.13 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 329 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.35 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 102 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:48:10 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 338.54 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 59% (1136/1918) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 78% (887/1136) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 49% (381/782) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 37% (43/115) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 33% (598/1805) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 61% (11/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 57% (13/23) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 45% (9/20) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 78% (7/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 91% (11/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 9% (11/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 23% (13/3) |
Patrick Rafter Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | 6-3 7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Robin | 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Robin | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Robin | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| SF | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| SF | 3-6 6-7(8) 6-3 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 7-5 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(3) 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R4 | 6-3 6-2 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R3 | 7-6(3) 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Martin Damm Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Martin Damm
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
68)
1
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
7
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
10 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Toby Alex Kodat
51%
(
55 of
107)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
94)
17
Aces
7
9
Double Faults
3
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
52%
(
27 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
37 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
94)
109
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(1) 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Martin Damm
63%
(
64 of
102)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
91)
9
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
7
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
91)
98
Total Points Won
95
|
7-5 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Martin Damm
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
13
Aces
18
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
48 of
59)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
40 of
49)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
30%
(
27 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
21 of
74)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Tommy Paul
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
0%
(
0 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
15 of
44)
43
Total Points Won
43
|
4-6 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Zhizhen Zhang
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
87)
14
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
87)
88
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(2) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Martin Damm
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
90)
13
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
38 of
50)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
8%
(
1 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
23 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
90)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(7) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Filip Misolic
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
13
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
4
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
36 of
45)
65%
(
24 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
21 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
77)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Riccardo Bonadio
63%
(
50 of
80)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
15
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
1
90%
(
45 of
50)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
22 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
22 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Francesco Maestrelli
Player
Martin Damm
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
7
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Rafter Vs Damm Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
