Prediction of Patrick Rafter vs Jonas Bjorkman Head-to-Head, Best Odds & Picks At Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
65% (347-184)
Career Total W/L
54% (438-373)
0% (0-0)
YTD Win/Loss
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$736,060
0
YTD Titles
0
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 | |||||
| 6-4 5-7 6-3 | |||||
| 6-2 7-6(3) 6-7(7) 6-2 | |||||
| 6-2 6-3 7-5 | |||||
| 6-3 6-2 | |||||
| 7-6(3) 7-6(3) | |||||
| 6-4 2-6 6-4 | |||||
| 6-3 3-6 6-3 | |||||
| 6-2 6-3 | |||||
| 6-3 6-3 | |||||
| stats | Patrick Rafter | Jonas Bjorkman |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 6 | 4 |
| Sets Won | 16 | 10 |
| Games Won | 140 | 112 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 0 |
| Average Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Break Points Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win% | 50% (4/8) | 50% (4/8) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Tiebreaks Win% (Total) | 25% (1/4) | 75% (3/4) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (6/6) | 100% (4/4) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (6/0) | 0% (4/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (4/0) | 0% (6/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Patrick Rafter vs Jonas Bjorkman Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Rafter 6 - 4 Bjorkman
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Rafter has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Bjorkman has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Rafter, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Bjorkman has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Rafter has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bjorkman has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Rafter has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Bjorkman winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Rafter has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 75% (W/L 74/ 25), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 28/ 30). Bjorkman has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 79/ 46), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 35% (W/L 36/ 68).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 10 times before with Rafter winning 6 times and Bjorkman being victorious 4 times. They have played 26 sets in total, with Rafter winning 16 and Bjorkman winning 10. The last match between Rafter and Bjorkman was at the Davis Cup, World Group, SF, AUS-SWE 4-1, 21-09-2001, Semifinals, Hard with Patrick Rafter getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Rafter and Bjorkman have played a deciding set 3 times, with Rafter winning 1 times and Bjorkman 2 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 4 tiebreaks against each other with Rafter winning 1, and Bjorkman 3.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Rafter has played against opponents with an average rank of while Bjorkman has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Rafter has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bjorkman has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Rafter has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bjorkman has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Patrick Rafter Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | 6-3 7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Robin | 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Robin | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Robin | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| SF | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| SF | 3-6 6-7(8) 6-3 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(3) 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R4 | 6-3 6-2 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R3 | 7-6(3) 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 7-5 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Jonas Bjorkman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Juan Monaco
Player
Jonas Bjorkman
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Robby Ginepri
Player
Jonas Bjorkman
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jonas Bjorkman
Player
Rajeev Ram
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jonas Bjorkman
Player
Chase Buchanan
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
James Blake
Player
Jonas Bjorkman
52%
(
34 of
66)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
1-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jonas Bjorkman
Player
Arnaud Clement
48%
(
40 of
84)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
83
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jonas Bjorkman
Player
Thomas Johansson
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
44%
(
22 of
50)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
10 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
18 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jonas Bjorkman
Player
Gary Lugassy
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tommy Robredo
Player
Jonas Bjorkman
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Rafter vs Bjorkman?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Rafter Vs Bjorkman is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Patrick Rafter | Jonas Bjorkman |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 65% (347/184) | 54% (438/373) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 61% (868/551) | 53% (1123/994) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (7526/6471) | 51% (10330/9817) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 68% (189/91) | 55% (204/164) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 48% (28/30) | 35% (36/68) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (56/38) | 56% (119/95) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 75% (74/25) | 63% (79/46) |
| Aces Per Game | 0 | 0.06 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 562 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0 | 0.04 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 421 |
| Average Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Average Opponent Rank | 323.27 | 396.22 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 59% (6564/11099) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 69% (4523/6525) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 49% (2219/4529) |
| Break Points Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 41% (394/961) |
| Return Points Win% | 0% (0/0) | 38% (4131/10755) |
| Slam W/L | 70% (76/33) | 61% (90/58) |
| Masters W/L | 62% (75/46) | 44% (80/100) |
| Cups W/L | 68% (15/7) | 60% (15/10) |
| Main Tour W/L | 66% (175/92) | 56% (248/194) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 33% (2/4) | 50% (2/2) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win% | 64% (258/401) | 52% (336/641) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win% | 68% (88/129) | 59% (98/165) |
| Tiebreaks Win% (Total) | 54% (139/256) | 49% (133/269) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 64% (101/158) | 52% (127/246) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (326/285) | 83% (438/365) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (326/41) | 17% (438/73) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 30% (205/62) | 19% (372/72) |
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
