Patrick Maloney vs Corentin Denolly Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W W L W W L
Form
W L L W L L L L W LHead To Head: Maloney 1 - 1 Denolly
They have played 5 sets in total, with Maloney winning 2 and Denolly winning 3. The last match between Maloney and Denolly was at the Sarasota Challenger, 07-04-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Patrick Maloney getting the victory 6-3 3-6 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Patrick Maloney | 1 |
| Corentin Denolly | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Sarasota Challenger(07-04-2025)
Patrick Maloney
Corentin Denolly
6
3
3
6
6
1
| Maloney | Stats | Denolly |
|---|---|---|
| 72% (26-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 41% (11-16) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 341 | Ranking | 302 |
| 337 | Highest Rank | 269 |
| 25 | Age | 27 |
| - | Plays | L |
| 3 | Titles | 12 |
| 66% (95-50) | Career Total W/L | 62% (413-248) |
| $3,650 | Career Prize Money | $56,935 |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Krejcikova VS Maria PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kalinskaya VS Bouzkova PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 3-6 6-1 |
Stats 
Patrick Maloney
Player
Corentin Denolly
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Patrick Maloney
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
73%
(
32 of
44)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 18 | Games Won | 22 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 1:31:24 | Average Match Time | 1:31:24 |
| 64% (76/119) | 1st Serve % | 63% (77/122) |
| 53% (40/76) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (47/77) |
| 51% (22/43) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (19/45) |
| 58% (7/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 71% (10/14) |
| 46% (56/122) | Return Points Win % | 48% (57/119) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Maloney vs Denolly Match Preview :
Let’s delve into the fascinating world of tennis statistics to uncover what we can expect in the upcoming clash between Denolly and Maloney. Who reigns supreme when it comes to handling second serves? Over the last six months, Denolly has managed to capture 43.94% of points on their second serve. In contrast, Maloney has edged slightly ahead, winning 44.12%. Such figures often serve as a crucial indicator in honing match prediction accuracy, leading many to speculate on who truly holds the competitive edge.
Shifting our attention to return game statistics, Denolly's recent form reveals a capture rate of 45.9% against their adversaries’ second serves, whereas Maloney is close behind at 45.62%. When facing first serves, the Frenchman has seized 23.95% compared to Maloney's robust 27.1%. These numbers play a pivotal role in determining who might have upper hand in this high-stakes head-to-head confrontation.
But what about high-pressure situations on the court? When the tension rises with breakpoints in sight, Denolly has efficiently saved 50.54% of these critical moments. Maloney, however, has saved a more impressive 54.05%, providing an intriguing angle for those interested in in-game betting predictions.
Over the past year, the win-loss records tell a compelling story. Denolly has triumphed in 67.11% of the matches he played, achieving a record of 51 wins against 25 defeats. Maloney, not far behind, secured victory in 66.67% with a tally of 46-23. As they prepare to face off, one might wonder how their overall performance will influence the final outcome.
The surface preference provides key insights as well. With a career win record on clay of 67% (292-146), Denolly shines brightest on this terrain, yet he dips to a 55% win rate on indoor hard courts (53-43). In contrast, Maloney is most successful on indoor hard courts, claiming victories in 69% (35-16) and struggles slightly on hard courts with a 61% win rate (28-18). Could the surface decisively sway the forthcoming encounter?
What about tournament experience? Denolly has excelled in the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K events at a staggering win rate of 82.05%, while Maloney has held his own firmly with a commendable 75% success rate in the same category. Faced with their accumulated experience, how will the playing level of these tournaments reflect on their head-to-head result?
Their direct encounters provide an intriguing element to consider. The duo has battled once before, with Denolly emerging victorious in both sets contested, the last being a dominating performance at the M15 Orange Park semifinals on clay. Past meetings have averaged a short runtime of 1 hour and 6 minutes, highlighting potential vulnerabilities. Additionally, neither player has faced each other in a tiebreak or deciding set, leaving those aspects unrecorded yet potentially critical.
Analyzing their opponents' qualities, Denolly contended with adversaries averaging a rank of 322.89 over the past year, while Maloney faced less formidable foes ranked 446.1 on average, providing Denolly with potentially stiffer competition. Furthermore, if this upcoming match stretches to a deciding set, Maloney's capability shines brightly with an 82% success rate, slightly outshining Denolly’s commendable 75% in similar clutch situations.
Finally, analyzing the ability to capitalize on breakpoints, Denolly has converted 25.2% of his opportunities lately, while Maloney has showcased a sharper aim by seizing 29.28%. The statistics deftly weave a narrative of anticipation, strategically positioned for live betting enthusiasts when the competitive heat turns up.
When one sifts through these figures, Maloney seems poised to carry the day, given her sharper breakpoints conversion, stellar success rate on deciding sets, and superior performance on her preferred surfaces. However, it would be unwise to count out Denolly, undeniably showcasing resilience and determination in both wins and face-offs against top-tier opponents. Expect this match to spiral into an engaging battle as they strive to outplay each other!
Maloney vs Denolly Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Patrick Maloney Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Adhithya Ganesan
Player
Patrick Maloney
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
58
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Noah Schachter
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
70%
(
31 of
44)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
0
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Matthew Forbes
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
0
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Patrick Maloney
68%
(
58 of
85)
1st Serve %
75%
(
55 of
73)
4
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
85
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Aidan Mayo
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Alex Rybakov
63%
(
67 of
107)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
103)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
48 of
65)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
37 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
35 of
103)
105
Total Points Won
105
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Kiranpal Pannu
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
26 of
40)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mathys Erhard
Player
Patrick Maloney
69%
(
64 of
93)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
87)
4
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
5
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
33 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Corentin Denolly Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Corentin Denolly
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
58 of
89)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
42%
(
31 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
48 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Enrico Dalla Valle
Player
Corentin Denolly
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francesco Maestrelli
Player
Corentin Denolly
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
101)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
101)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oliver Crawford
Player
Corentin Denolly
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Inaki Montes-De La Torre
Player
Corentin Denolly
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve %
66%
(
23 of
35)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
53
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Blaise Bicknell
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
66%
(
65 of
98)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
98)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Corentin Denolly
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66% (95/50) | Win/Loss | 62% (413/248) |
| 62% (207/128) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (902/605) |
| 54% (1712/1442) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (7560/6490) |
| 61% (28/18) | Hard Win/Loss | 56% (61/48) |
| 67% (32/16) | Clay Win/Loss | 66% (294/153) |
| 69% (35/16) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55% (58/47) |
| 0.38 | Aces Per Game | 0.29 |
| 579 | Aces Total | 2005 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 375 | Total Double Faults | 1903 |
| 1:34:40 | Average Match Time | 1:26:52 |
| 393.21 | Average Opponent Rank | 497.01 |
| 65% (5743/8880) | 1st Serve % | 65% (26602/40921) |
| 70% (3993/5743) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (17906/26602) |
| 49% (1532/3137) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (6974/14320) |
| 43% (397/924) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (2090/4639) |
| 41% (3676/9001) | Return Points Win % | 43% (17678/41530) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 40% (2/3) |
| 50% (1/1) | Main Tour W/L | 75% (3/1) |
| 56% (23/18) | Challenger W/L | 43% (53/69) |
| 70% (71/31) | Futures W/L | 67% (355/175) |
| 65% (93/143) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (410/652) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 57% (21/37) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (102/180) |
| 60% (28/47) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (114/192) |
| 84% (99/83) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (398/359) |
| 16% (99/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (398/39) |
| 24% (46/11) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (263/54) |
Maloney vs. Denolly Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
