Patrick Kypson vs Paul Jubb Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W L L W L
Form
W W L W L W L W L LHead-To-Head: Kypson 1 - 0 Jubb
They have played 2 sets in total, with Kypson winning 2 and Jubb winning 0. The last match between Kypson and Jubb was at the Tyler Challenger, 05-06-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Hard, with Patrick Kypson getting the victory 7-5 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Patrick Kypson | 1 |
| Paul Jubb | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Tyler Challenger(05-06-2025)
Patrick Kypson
Paul Jubb
7
5
6
1
| Kypson | Stats | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| 77% (24-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 43% (13-17) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 218 | Ranking | 397 |
| 133 | Highest Rank | 180 |
| 25 | Age | 25 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 8 | Titles | 11 |
| 63% (231-133) | Career Total W/L | 66% (231-117) |
| $235,295 | Career Prize Money | $200,960 |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Carabelli VS Jong PREDICTION Clay
Nordea Open - Bastad atp
19 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Gasanova VS Hruncakova PREDICTION Hard
Prague Open - Prague wta
19 Jul 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-1 |
Stats 
Patrick Kypson
Player
Paul Jubb
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
64)
9
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
9
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 6 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 1:30:33 | Average Match Time | 1:30:33 |
| 68% (39/57) | 1st Serve % | 48% (31/64) |
| 77% (30/39) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (17/31) |
| 72% (13/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 55% (18/33) |
| 75% (3/4) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/4) |
| 45% (29/64) | Return Points Win % | 25% (14/57) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kypson vs Jubb Match Preview :
- Jubb has a slightly lower second serve success rate at 46.56% compared to Kypson's 48.96%. Could this marginal difference in second-serve points impact the match outcome?
- In return game stats, Kypson outperforms Jubb in second serve returns, winning 45.95% of points versus Jubb's 43.63%.
- Conversely, Jubb excels in first serve returns, winning 30.74% of points compared to Kypson's 24.54%, highlighting an advantage in these exchanges.
- Under pressure, Jubb has a notable edge, saving 56.55% of break points while Kypson saves slightly fewer at 51.06%.
- Looking at match performance over the last year, Kypson has a clear advantage with a win rate of 62.5%, surpassing Jubb's 48.94%.
- Both players favor clay courts, with Jubb winning 72% and Kypson 69% on this surface. Jubb, however, performs better on grass compared to Kypson.
- When considering performance at ITF/Challenger level events, Kypson again surpasses Jubb, winning 65.12% of matches against Jubb's 37.04%.
- Jubb has faced slightly tougher competition with opponents averaging a rank of 271.17 compared to Kypson's 318.73, which might influence his match readiness.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Jubb shows a marginal edge, having won 55% of such sets in the past 12 months, versus Kypson's 50%.
- Jubb also has a higher breakpoint conversion rate at 34.13% compared to Kypson's 23.93%, a key factor during critical points in matches.
Editorial Prediction (June 5, 2025, UTC):
Upon reviewing the statistics, both players display unique strengths; however, significant factors point towards a likely winner.
Kypson's overall stronger performance in match win percentage over the past year and superior results at the ITF/Challenger events demonstrate a consistent edge in matches.
Nonetheless, Jubb showcases efficient break point conversion and resilience in pressure situations, making him a formidable opponent in pivotal moments.
In this matchup, while Jubb's ability to contend against higher-ranked players and excel in break point situations is noteworthy, Kypson's overall match-winning consistency likely tips the balance in his favor.
Therefore, based on these factors, Kypson is the favored choice to win the upcoming tennis match.
Kypson vs Jubb Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Patrick Kypson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Patrick Kypson
53%
(
58 of
109)
1st Serve %
68%
(
75 of
110)
20
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
5
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
57 of
75)
65%
(
33 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
32 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
35 of
110)
112
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(5) 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
6
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
53
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Ghibaudo
Player
Patrick Kypson
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
4
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(1) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Rei Sakamoto
Player
Patrick Kypson
67%
(
56 of
84)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
14
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
3
82%
(
46 of
56)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
40 of
52)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
24 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
28 of
87)
88
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(1) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Alexis Galarneau
58%
(
49 of
85)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
102)
9
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
39 of
60)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
33%
(
28 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
102)
98
Total Points Won
89
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Karue Sell
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
7
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
33 of
41)
67%
(
22 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Masamichi Imamura
53%
(
35 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF | w/o | H2H | |||
view more
Paul Jubb Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Eliot Spizzirri
Player
Paul Jubb
57%
(
58 of
101)
1st Serve %
55%
(
58 of
105)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
13
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
36 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
105)
111
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
Paul Jubb
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve %
69%
(
56 of
81)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Leandro Riedi
59%
(
54 of
92)
1st Serve %
63%
(
56 of
89)
2
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
6
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
40 of
56)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
32 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Giulio Zeppieri
Player
Paul Jubb
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Thiago Agustin Tirante
47%
(
26 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
6
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Paul Jubb
68%
(
77 of
114)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
88)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
40 of
61)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
42 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
109
Total Points Won
93
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
56%
(
45 of
81)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
4
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marin Cilic
Player
Paul Jubb
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
7
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
21 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (231/133) | Win/Loss | 66% (231/117) |
| 61% (507/320) | Sets Win/Loss | 63% (514/297) |
| 55% (4319/3580) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (4254/3498) |
| 59% (87/60) | Hard Win/Loss | 69% (122/54) |
| 69% (103/47) | Clay Win/Loss | 72% (57/22) |
| 64% (39/22) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58% (30/22) |
| 33% (2/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 54% (22/19) |
| 0.44 | Aces Per Game | 0.29 |
| 1691 | Aces Total | 1111 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 655 | Total Double Faults | 1050 |
| 1:32:23 | Average Match Time | 1:36:59 |
| 408.01 | Average Opponent Rank | 388.88 |
| 62% (13666/22042) | 1st Serve % | 62% (14145/22806) |
| 71% (9721/13666) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (9829/14145) |
| 52% (4342/8376) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (4534/8661) |
| 44% (886/2002) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1037/2506) |
| 39% (8509/21815) | Return Points Win % | 41% (9782/23704) |
| 33% (4/8) | Slam W/L | 36% (5/9) |
| 33% (2/4) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 45% (5/6) | Main Tour W/L | 63% (10/6) |
| 62% (105/65) | Challenger W/L | 53% (66/59) |
| 70% (115/50) | Futures W/L | 78% (150/43) |
| 64% (229/357) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (228/339) |
| 0% (0/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 20% (1/5) |
| 47% (62/131) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (69/116) |
| 54% (53/98) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (62/112) |
| 89% (227/201) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (224/201) |
| 11% (227/26) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (224/22) |
| 22% (137/30) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (124/30) |
Kypson vs. Jubb Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
