search

Patrick Kypson vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kypson vs Wong analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Want To Bet On This Match?

After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:

* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here

If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com  Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.

Patrick Kypson vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Kypson 2 - 0 Wong

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kypson has won 52% of points on their second serve, while Wong has won 47.69%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kypson, in recent form, has won 49.87% of their opponent's second serve points, while Wong has won 49.47%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.61% and 30.38% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Kypson has saved 62.6% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wong has saved 58.15% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Kypson has won 55.93% of matches played (W/L 33/ 26), with Wong winning 57.58% (W/L 38/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Kypson has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 68% (W/L 32/ 15), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3). Wong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 83/ 58), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
  • Player level: In the last year, Kypson has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.54% of matches (W/L 24/ 15), where as Wong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.55% of matches (W/L 24/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Kypson winning 2 times and Wong being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Kypson winning 4 and Wong winning 0. The last match between Kypson and Wong was at the French Open - Paris, 21-05-2024, Q1 round, Clay with Patrick Kypson getting the victory 7-5 6-2.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:19:44.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Kypson and Wong have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kypson winning 0 times and Wong 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kypson winning 0, and Wong 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kypson has played against opponents with an average rank of 282.9 while Wong has played against players with an average rank of 278.55.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kypson has won 21% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wong has won 62% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Kypson has converted 40.56% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wong has converted 33.65% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
bet365
Patrick Kypson

6

Total

0

Mast

3

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

3

Minor

157

Rank

133

High

24

Age

R

Plays

2

Total

0

0

Hard

0

2

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

179

Rank

166

High

20

Age

Plays

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

2

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

2

Minor

2

Total

0

0

Hard

0

2

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

L W L W L L W L W L

Form

L L L W W W L L L L

63% (197-115)

Career Total W/L

56% (104-82)

50% (16-16)

YTD W/L

42% (13-18)

$183,295

Career Prize Money

$23,250

1

YTD Titles

0

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

The Best Odds For Patrick Kypson vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong For Any Market:

We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:

Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Kypson VS Wong

Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!

Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting

Kypson VS Wong H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

stats Patrick Kypson Chak Lam Coleman Wong
All H2H Matches 2 0
Sets Won 4 0
Games Won 25 11
Aces (Total) 7 9
DFs Total 2 9
Avg Match Time 1:19:44 1:19:44
1st Serve % 55% (64/116) 56% (64/114)
1st Serve Win% 78% (50/64) 61% (39/64)
2nd Serve Win% 60% (31/52) 42% (21/50)
BPs Won% (Total) 50% (8/16) 13% (1/8)
Return Points W% 47% (54/114) 30% (35/116)
Best of 3 Sets W% 100% (2/2) 0% (0/2)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 100% (2/2) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 0% (2/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 0% (0/0) 0% (2/0)

Kypson VS Wong H2h Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
7-5 6-2
cross
Patrick Kypson
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
52% ( 31 of 60)
1st Serve %
49% ( 35 of 71)
6
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
84% ( 26 of 31)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 22 of 35)
55% ( 16 of 29)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 16 of 36)
33% ( 4 of 12)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
30% ( 18 of 60)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 33 of 71)
75
Total Points Won
56
6-3 6-1
cross
Patrick Kypson
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
59% ( 33 of 56)
1st Serve %
67% ( 29 of 43)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
73% ( 24 of 33)
1st Serve Won
59% ( 17 of 29)
65% ( 15 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
36% ( 5 of 14)
100% ( 4 of 4)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 4)
30% ( 17 of 56)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 21 of 43)
60
Total Points Won
39

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Patrick Kypson Chak Lam Coleman Wong
YTD W/L 50% (16/16) 42% (13/18)
Sets Win/Loss 52% (38/35) 45% (33/40)
Games Win/Loss 52% (384/359) 49% (355/375)
Hard Win/Loss 45% (5/6) 52% (13/12)
Clay Win/Loss 36% (4/7) 0% (0/2)
Indoor Hard W/L 100% (5/0) 0% (0/1)
Grass Win/Loss 40% (2/3) 0% (0/3)
Aces pg 0.71 0.61
Aces Total 260 219
DFs per game 0.16 0.25
DFs Total 57 89
Avg Match Time 1:43:27 1:48:9
Avg Opp Rank 256.5 336.29
1st Serve % 61% (1379/2254) 56% (1300/2325)
1st Serve W% 75% (1040/1379) 73% (950/1300)
2nd Serve W% 53% (462/875) 48% (487/1025)
BPs Won% Total 42% (66/156) 33% (72/216)
Return Pts W% 35% (772/2237) 37% (876/2368)
Slam W/L 40% (2/3) 0% (0/2)
Masters W/L 25% (1/3) 50% (1/1)
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 63% (5/3) 0% (0/1)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 53% (8/7) 46% (12/14)
Futures W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets W% 50% (15/30) 40% (12/30)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/1) 100% (1/1)
TBs Win% (Total) 42% (8/19) 60% (6/10)
Deciding Set W% 25% (2/8) 30% (3/10)
1st set W, W 74% (19/14) 77% (13/10)
1st set W, L 26% (19/5) 23% (13/3)
1st set L, W 15% (13/2) 17% (18/3)

Patrick Kypson Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
Q2
cross
Leandro Riedi
Player
Patrick Kypson
63% ( 55 of 88)
1st Serve %
59% ( 55 of 93)
15
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
8
75% ( 41 of 55)
1st Serve Won
67% ( 37 of 55)
55% ( 18 of 33)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 19 of 38)
36% ( 4 of 11)
Break Points Won
50% ( 3 of 6)
33% ( 29 of 88)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 37 of 93)
96
Total Points Won
85
L
6-2 3-6 7-5 H2H
Q1
cross
Patrick Kypson
Player
Stuart Parker
70% ( 47 of 67)
1st Serve %
65% ( 47 of 72)
7
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
1
79% ( 37 of 47)
1st Serve Won
81% ( 38 of 47)
60% ( 12 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
24% ( 6 of 25)
50% ( 2 of 4)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
27% ( 18 of 67)
Rtn Points Won
39% ( 28 of 72)
77
Total Points Won
62
W
6-3 7-6(3) H2H
Q1
cross
Patrick Kypson
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
73% ( 44 of 60)
1st Serve %
61% ( 36 of 59)
11
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
4
82% ( 36 of 44)
1st Serve Won
72% ( 26 of 36)
56% ( 9 of 16)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 10 of 23)
50% ( 2 of 4)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
25% ( 15 of 60)
Rtn Points Won
39% ( 23 of 59)
68
Total Points Won
51
W
6-1 7-6(2) H2H
QF
cross
Benjamin Bonzi
Player
Patrick Kypson
66% ( 40 of 61)
1st Serve %
67% ( 47 of 70)
8
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
78% ( 31 of 40)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 33 of 47)
52% ( 11 of 21)
2nd Serve Won
35% ( 8 of 23)
60% ( 3 of 5)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
31% ( 19 of 61)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 29 of 70)
71
Total Points Won
60
L
6-2 7-6(5) H2H
R1
cross
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Patrick Kypson
71% ( 96 of 135)
1st Serve %
63% ( 84 of 133)
10
Aces
21
4
Double Faults
1
71% ( 68 of 96)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 59 of 84)
46% ( 18 of 39)
2nd Serve Won
47% ( 23 of 49)
33% ( 3 of 9)
Break Points Won
17% ( 2 of 12)
36% ( 49 of 135)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 51 of 133)
137
Total Points Won
131
L
6-7(3) 7-5 7-6(3) H2H
Q2
cross
Jeff Wolf
Player
Patrick Kypson
56% ( 29 of 52)
1st Serve %
61% ( 31 of 51)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
0
86% ( 25 of 29)
1st Serve Won
68% ( 21 of 31)
48% ( 11 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
30% ( 6 of 20)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
31% ( 16 of 52)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 24 of 51)
60
Total Points Won
43
L
6-3 6-3 H2H
Q1
cross
Patrick Kypson
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
52% ( 31 of 60)
1st Serve %
49% ( 35 of 71)
6
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
84% ( 26 of 31)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 22 of 35)
55% ( 16 of 29)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 16 of 36)
33% ( 4 of 12)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
30% ( 18 of 60)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 33 of 71)
75
Total Points Won
56
W
7-5 6-2 H2H
R2
cross
Beibit Zhukayev
Player
Patrick Kypson
59% ( 43 of 73)
1st Serve %
65% ( 50 of 77)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
84% ( 36 of 43)
1st Serve Won
68% ( 34 of 50)
53% ( 16 of 30)
2nd Serve Won
56% ( 15 of 27)
67% ( 2 of 3)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
29% ( 21 of 73)
Rtn Points Won
36% ( 28 of 77)
80
Total Points Won
70
L
7-5 7-6(5) H2H
R1
cross
Patrick Kypson
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
59% ( 33 of 56)
1st Serve %
67% ( 29 of 43)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
73% ( 24 of 33)
1st Serve Won
59% ( 17 of 29)
65% ( 15 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
36% ( 5 of 14)
100% ( 4 of 4)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 4)
30% ( 17 of 56)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 21 of 43)
60
Total Points Won
39
W
6-3 6-1 H2H
Q1
cross
Zizou Bergs
Player
Patrick Kypson
54% ( 45 of 84)
1st Serve %
71% ( 54 of 76)
7
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
0
78% ( 35 of 45)
1st Serve Won
72% ( 39 of 54)
67% ( 26 of 39)
2nd Serve Won
68% ( 15 of 22)
40% ( 2 of 5)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
27% ( 23 of 84)
Rtn Points Won
29% ( 22 of 76)
83
Total Points Won
77
L
4-6 6-3 6-4 H2H

Chak Lam Coleman Wong Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
Q1
cross
Zachary Svajda
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
64% ( 32 of 50)
1st Serve %
52% ( 32 of 61)
1
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
7
91% ( 29 of 32)
1st Serve Won
84% ( 27 of 32)
67% ( 12 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 12 of 29)
40% ( 2 of 5)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
18% ( 9 of 50)
Rtn Points Won
36% ( 22 of 61)
63
Total Points Won
48
L
6-4 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Stefano Napolitano
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
73% ( 36 of 49)
1st Serve %
70% ( 39 of 56)
8
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
0
89% ( 32 of 36)
1st Serve Won
74% ( 29 of 39)
62% ( 8 of 13)
2nd Serve Won
53% ( 9 of 17)
100% ( 2 of 2)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
18% ( 9 of 49)
Rtn Points Won
32% ( 18 of 56)
58
Total Points Won
47
L
6-4 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Billy Harris
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
79% ( 42 of 53)
1st Serve %
61% ( 28 of 46)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
83% ( 35 of 42)
1st Serve Won
82% ( 23 of 28)
64% ( 7 of 11)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 8 of 18)
100% ( 2 of 2)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
21% ( 11 of 53)
Rtn Points Won
33% ( 15 of 46)
57
Total Points Won
42
L
6-3 6-4 H2H
SF
cross
James Kent Trotter
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
51% ( 55 of 108)
1st Serve %
57% ( 64 of 113)
4
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
2
71% ( 39 of 55)
1st Serve Won
67% ( 43 of 64)
51% ( 27 of 53)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 21 of 49)
36% ( 5 of 14)
Break Points Won
27% ( 4 of 15)
39% ( 42 of 108)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 49 of 113)
115
Total Points Won
106
L
6-2 4-6 7-6(4) H2H
QF
cross
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Ethan Quinn
56% ( 28 of 50)
1st Serve %
51% ( 27 of 53)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
86% ( 24 of 28)
1st Serve Won
67% ( 18 of 27)
45% ( 10 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 10 of 26)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
32% ( 16 of 50)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 25 of 53)
59
Total Points Won
44
W
6-2 6-2 H2H
R2
cross
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Stefan Kozlov
60% ( 49 of 81)
1st Serve %
60% ( 54 of 90)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
71% ( 35 of 49)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 35 of 54)
47% ( 15 of 32)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 16 of 36)
33% ( 4 of 12)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
38% ( 31 of 81)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 39 of 90)
89
Total Points Won
82
W
4-6 6-4 4-1 ret. H2H
R1
cross
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Cannon Kingsley
54% ( 33 of 61)
1st Serve %
62% ( 48 of 77)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
82% ( 27 of 33)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 31 of 48)
57% ( 16 of 28)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 13 of 29)
21% ( 3 of 14)
Break Points Won
20% ( 1 of 5)
30% ( 18 of 61)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 33 of 77)
76
Total Points Won
62
W
7-5 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Andres Andrade
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
50% ( 48 of 96)
1st Serve %
52% ( 49 of 95)
2
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
4
65% ( 31 of 48)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 32 of 49)
50% ( 24 of 48)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 18 of 46)
73% ( 8 of 11)
Break Points Won
100% ( 5 of 5)
43% ( 41 of 96)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 45 of 95)
100
Total Points Won
91
L
6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 H2H
Q1
cross
Patrick Kypson
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
52% ( 31 of 60)
1st Serve %
49% ( 35 of 71)
6
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
84% ( 26 of 31)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 22 of 35)
55% ( 16 of 29)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 16 of 36)
33% ( 4 of 12)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
30% ( 18 of 60)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 33 of 71)
75
Total Points Won
56
L
7-5 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Patrick Kypson
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
59% ( 33 of 56)
1st Serve %
67% ( 29 of 43)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
73% ( 24 of 33)
1st Serve Won
59% ( 17 of 29)
65% ( 15 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
36% ( 5 of 14)
100% ( 4 of 4)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 4)
30% ( 17 of 56)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 21 of 43)
60
Total Points Won
39
L
6-3 6-1 H2H

Kypson Vs Wong Prediction H2H Images To Share

More tennis photos of Kypson are available here and Wong photos here.


Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions