Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Patricia Maria Tig vs Zoe Gwen Scandalis Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tig vs Scandalis analysis and find out who is favored!
Patricia Maria Tig vs Zoe Gwen Scandalis Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tig has won 39.2% of points on his second serve, while Scandalis has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tig, in recent form, has won 49.57% of his opponent's second serve points, while Scandalis has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.83% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tig has saved 44.07% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Scandalis has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tig has won 37.04% of matches played (W/L 10/ 17), with Scandalis winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tig has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 200/ 100), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 13% (W/L 1/ 7). Scandalis has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 17/ 16), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Tig has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 26.67% of matches (W/L 4/ 11), where as Scandalis has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tig winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Tig winning 1 and Scandalis winning 2. The last match between Tig and Scandalis was at the W15 Cancun, 22-05-2019, First, Hard with Zoe Gwen Scandalis getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:21:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tig and Scandalis have played a deciding set 0 times, with Tig winning 0 times and Scandalis 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Tig winning 0, and Scandalis 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tig has played against opponents with an average rank of 243.22 while Scandalis has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tig has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Scandalis has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tig has converted 48.57% of breakpoint opportunities, and Scandalis has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Tig 0 - 1 Scandalis
473
Rank
56
High
29
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
868
High
30
Age
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
62% (323-199)
Career Total W/L
51% (90-86)
25% (1-3)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$584,816
Career Prize Money
$2,025
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Patricia Maria Tig | Zoe Gwen Scandalis |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 9 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:21:0 | 2:21:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (44/68) | 61% (46/76) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 55% (24/44) | 67% (31/46) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 38% (9/24) | 30% (9/30) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 36% (4/11) | 42% (5/12) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (36/76) | 51% (35/68) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 6-3 3-0 ret. |
Stats 
Zoe Gwen Scandalis
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
30%
(
9 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
47%
(
36 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
69
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Patricia Maria Tig | Zoe Gwen Scandalis |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 29% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 37% (21/36) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.04 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 1 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 1.07 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 29 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:25:45 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 303.25 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 52% (101/193) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 55% (56/101) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 38% (35/92) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 60% (9/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (80/185) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Patricia Maria Tig Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Ayla Aksu
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
60%
(
9 of
15)
1st Serve %
60%
(
12 of
20)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
44%
(
4 of
9)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
17%
(
1 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
67%
(
10 of
15)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
14 of
20)
19
Total Points Won
16
|
4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Chiara Fornasieri
53%
(
40 of
76)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
0
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Hietaranta
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martina Colmegna
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
79%
(
48 of
61)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
10
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasija Sevastova
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francesca Curmi
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
78%
(
62 of
80)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
6
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
5-7 6-0 2-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nuria Parrizas-Diaz
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
79
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
73%
(
69 of
94)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
0
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
45%
(
42 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
92
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Martha Matoula
61%
(
70 of
115)
1st Serve %
61%
(
70 of
114)
1
Aces
1
14
Double Faults
11
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
33%
(
15 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
56%
(
10 of
18)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
47%
(
54 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
58 of
114)
119
Total Points Won
110
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Margaux Rouvroy
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
7
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
28%
(
20 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
94
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Zoe Gwen Scandalis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jeanette Mireles
Player
Zoe Gwen Scandalis
71%
(
5 of
7)
1st Serve %
67%
(
4 of
6)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
40%
(
2 of
5)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
50%
(
1 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
5
Total Points Won
8
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pamela Montez
Player
Zoe Gwen Scandalis
63%
(
50 of
80)
1st Serve %
64%
(
53 of
83)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
83)
90
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimmi Hance
Player
Zoe Gwen Scandalis
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve %
72%
(
39 of
54)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Ingrid Martins
Player
Zoe Gwen Scandalis
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zoe Gwen Scandalis
Player
Aiko Yoshitomi
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
72)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
37 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
88
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zoe Gwen Scandalis
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
48%
(
28 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zoe Gwen Scandalis
Player
Maria Gomez
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve %
41%
(
13 of
32)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
6 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
50
Total Points Won
13
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Makenna Jones
Player
Zoe Gwen Scandalis
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
53%
(
19 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zoe Gwen Scandalis
Player
Katya Townsend
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Tig Vs Scandalis Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
