Patricia Maria Tig vs Kirsten Flipkens Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Head-To-Head
1 - 0
64% (388-216)
Career Total W/L
56% (495-383)
0% (0-0)
YTD Win/Loss
0% (0-0)
$584,816
Career Prize Money
$3,051,580
0
YTD Titles
0
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Kirsten Flipkens
49%
(
38 of
77)
1st Serve %
48%
(
28 of
58)
2
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
3
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
33 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
| stats | Patricia Maria Tig | Kirsten Flipkens |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| Total Double Faults | 9 | 3 |
| Average Match Time | 1:33:44 | 1:33:44 |
| 1st Serve % | 49% (38/77) | 48% (28/58) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 61% (23/38) | 46% (13/28) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (21/39) | 53% (16/30) |
| Break Points Won % (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 38% (3/8) |
| Return Points Win % | 50% (29/58) | 43% (33/77) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Patricia Maria Tig Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mariam Bolkvadze
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 1-6 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Belinda Bencic
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Jeline Vandromme
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
45%
(
23 of
51)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
8
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
47%
(
24 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
60
Total Points Won
53
|
0-6 6-1 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Emma Lene
49%
(
36 of
73)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Katharina Hobgarski
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
46%
(
27 of
59)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
8
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve %
50%
(
33 of
66)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
10
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Selina Dal
50%
(
42 of
84)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emeline Dartron
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Kirsten Flipkens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Simona Halep
Player
Kirsten Flipkens
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kirsten Flipkens
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
73%
(
55 of
75)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Viktoriya Tomova
Player
Kirsten Flipkens
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
92)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
92)
88
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kirsten Flipkens
Player
Elise Mertens
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve %
50%
(
34 of
68)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
10
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kirsten Flipkens
Player
Maryna Zanevska
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
28 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kirsten Flipkens
Player
Viktoriya Tomova
78%
(
74 of
95)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
99)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
52 of
74)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
46 of
67)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
28 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
99)
101
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kirsten Flipkens
Player
Kristina Mladenovic
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Shelby Rogers
Player
Kirsten Flipkens
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
83)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
36 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
90
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kirsten Flipkens
Player
Ann Li
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
72%
(
28 of
39)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kirsten Flipkens
Player
Anastasia Tikhonova
63%
(
56 of
89)
1st Serve %
53%
(
47 of
89)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
12
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
37 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
84
|
6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Patricia Maria Tig | Kirsten Flipkens |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 64% (388/216) | 56% (495/383) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (855/506) | 54% (1098/925) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (6832/5414) | 52% (9667/9060) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 58% (99/72) | 55% (180/146) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 70% (253/109) | 55% (125/102) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 56% (35/28) | 56% (122/95) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 13% (1/7) | 63% (68/40) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.1 | 0.17 |
| Aces Total | 591 | 1590 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 | 0.16 |
| Total Double Faults | 1709 | 1440 |
| Average Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Average Opponent Rank | 487.56 | 467.53 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (13677/22836) | 60% (24370/40725) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 63% (8657/13677) | 64% (15555/24370) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (4203/9159) | 46% (7585/16352) |
| Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1457/3013) | 45% (2080/4582) |
| Return Points Win % | 47% (10566/22476) | 43% (17172/39797) |
| Slam W/L | 21% (6/22) | 49% (59/61) |
| Masters W/L | 55% (16/13) | 48% (53/57) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 41% (14/20) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (50/50) | 55% (190/155) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 61% (125/79) | 66% (174/90) |
| Futures W/L | 79% (190/52) | 100% (5/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 65% (382/586) | 56% (484/860) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 25% (1/4) | 67% (2/3) |
| Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (71/120) | 55% (110/201) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 51% (85/166) | 58% (163/280) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (401/352) | 86% (459/397) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (401/49) | 13% (459/60) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (201/36) | 23% (419/95) |
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
