Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Patricia Maria Tig vs Kirsten Flipkens Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tig vs Flipkens analysis and find out who is favored!
Patricia Maria Tig vs Kirsten Flipkens Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tig has won 39.88% of points on his second serve, while Flipkens has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tig, in recent form, has won 47.71% of his opponent's second serve points, while Flipkens has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.21% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tig has saved 46.43% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Flipkens has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tig has won 38.46% of matches played (W/L 10/ 16), with Flipkens winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tig has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 200/ 99), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 13% (W/L 1/ 7). Flipkens has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 68/ 40), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 180/ 146).
- Player level: In the last year, Tig has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 28.57% of matches (W/L 4/ 10), where as Flipkens has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tig winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Tig winning 2 and Flipkens winning 0. The last match between Tig and Flipkens was at the Korea Open - Seoul, 22-09-2016, Second, Hard with Patricia Maria Tig getting the victory 1100038403.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:33:44.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tig and Flipkens have played a deciding set 0 times, with Tig winning 0 times and Flipkens 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Tig winning 0, and Flipkens 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tig has played against opponents with an average rank of 226.65 while Flipkens has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tig has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Flipkens has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tig has converted 46.88% of breakpoint opportunities, and Flipkens has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Tig 1 - 0 Flipkens
474
Rank
56
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
531
Rank
13
High
38
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
Form
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
62% (323-198)
Career Total W/L
56% (495-383)
33% (1-2)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$584,816
Career Prize Money
$3,051,580
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Patricia Maria Tig | Kirsten Flipkens |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 9 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:33:44 | 1:33:44 |
| 1st Serve % | 49% (38/77) | 48% (28/58) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 61% (23/38) | 46% (13/28) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 54% (21/39) | 53% (16/30) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 38% (3/8) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (29/58) | 43% (33/77) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Kirsten Flipkens
49%
(
38 of
77)
1st Serve %
48%
(
28 of
58)
2
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
3
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
33 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Patricia Maria Tig | Kirsten Flipkens |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 37% (19/32) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.04 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 1 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 1.04 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 25 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:40 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 179.67 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 51% (89/173) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 58% (52/89) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 39% (33/84) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 58% (7/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (70/170) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Patricia Maria Tig Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Chiara Fornasieri
53%
(
40 of
76)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
0
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Hietaranta
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martina Colmegna
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
79%
(
48 of
61)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
10
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasija Sevastova
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francesca Curmi
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
78%
(
62 of
80)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
6
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
5-7 6-0 2-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nuria Parrizas-Diaz
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
79
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
73%
(
69 of
94)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
0
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
45%
(
42 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
92
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Martha Matoula
61%
(
70 of
115)
1st Serve %
61%
(
70 of
114)
1
Aces
1
14
Double Faults
11
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
33%
(
15 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
56%
(
10 of
18)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
47%
(
54 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
58 of
114)
119
Total Points Won
110
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Margaux Rouvroy
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
7
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
28%
(
20 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
94
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Emily Appleton
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
2
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
4
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Kirsten Flipkens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Simona Halep
Player
Kirsten Flipkens
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kirsten Flipkens
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
73%
(
55 of
75)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Viktoriya Tomova
Player
Kirsten Flipkens
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
92)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
92)
88
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kirsten Flipkens
Player
Elise Mertens
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve %
50%
(
34 of
68)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
10
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kirsten Flipkens
Player
Maryna Zanevska
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
28 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kirsten Flipkens
Player
Viktoriya Tomova
78%
(
74 of
95)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
99)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
52 of
74)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
46 of
67)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
28 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
99)
101
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kirsten Flipkens
Player
Kristina Mladenovic
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Shelby Rogers
Player
Kirsten Flipkens
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
83)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
36 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
90
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kirsten Flipkens
Player
Ann Li
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
72%
(
28 of
39)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kirsten Flipkens
Player
Anastasia Tikhonova
63%
(
56 of
89)
1st Serve %
53%
(
47 of
89)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
12
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
37 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
84
|
6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Tig Vs Flipkens Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Patricia Maria Tig
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
