Patricia Maria Tig vs Federica Urgesi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L W W W W L L
Form
L W L W L W L W L LH2H: Tig 1 - 0 Urgesi
They have played 2 sets in total, with Tig winning 2 and Urgesi winning 0. The last match between Tig and Urgesi was at the W35 Santa Margherita di Pula, 09-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Patricia Maria Tig getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Patricia Maria Tig | 1 |
| Federica Urgesi | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W35 Santa Margherita di Pula(09-04-2025)
Patricia Maria Tig
Federica Urgesi
6
1
6
2
| Tig | Stats | Urgesi |
|---|---|---|
| 56% (18-14) | YTD Win/Loss | 43% (13-17) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 210 | Ranking | 429 |
| 56 | Highest Rank | 429 |
| 30 | Age | 20 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 23 | Titles | 0 |
| 64% (406-230) | Career Total W/L | 48% (64-70) |
| $673,476 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Buzarnescu VS Ryser PREDICTION Hard
Prague Open - Prague wta
19 Jul 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Stojanovic VS Kovackova PREDICTION Hard
Prague Open - Prague wta
19 Jul 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Federica Urgesi
48%
(
22 of
46)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:26:59 | Average Match Time | 1:26:59 |
| 48% (22/46) | 1st Serve % | 66% (31/47) |
| 73% (16/22) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (16/31) |
| 63% (15/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 31% (5/16) |
| 83% (5/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 55% (26/47) | Return Points Win % | 33% (15/46) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Patricia Maria Tig Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Lourdes Carle
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
75%
(
55 of
73)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
91)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
48%
(
35 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
49 of
91)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
2-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Despina Papamichail
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve %
61%
(
14 of
23)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
58%
(
18 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
44%
(
18 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
36
Total Points Won
28
|
6-4 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Martha Matoula
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
46%
(
27 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Elena Ruxandra Bertea
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve %
74%
(
40 of
54)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Carmen Andreea Herea
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
99)
1
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
8
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
40 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
95
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Arina Gabriela Vasilescu
53%
(
40 of
75)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
1
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
3
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
47%
(
35 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
92)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
9
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
49 of
92)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(0) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Robin Montgomery
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
8
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Federica Urgesi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Valentini Grammatikopoulou
Player
Federica Urgesi
45%
(
10 of
22)
1st Serve %
68%
(
17 of
25)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
70%
(
7 of
10)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
50%
(
11 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
27
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ariana Geerlings
Player
Federica Urgesi
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
0
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
8
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
24 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federica Urgesi
Player
Kristina Kroitor
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriela Ce
Player
Federica Urgesi
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
95)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
5
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
47%
(
40 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
48 of
95)
94
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 6-7(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federica Urgesi
Player
Carlota Martinez Cirez
67%
(
56 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
84)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
16
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
46%
(
39 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nika Radisic
Player
Federica Urgesi
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federica Urgesi
Player
Chiara Fornasieri
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
73%
(
66 of
91)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
84
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Federica Urgesi
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
42%
(
20 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
47
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64% (406/230) | Win/Loss | 48% (64/70) |
| 63% (895/536) | Sets Win/Loss | 48% (154/165) |
| 56% (7175/5712) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (1535/1528) |
| 58% (99/73) | Hard Win/Loss | 43% (3/4) |
| 69% (270/121) | Clay Win/Loss | 43% (38/51) |
| 56% (35/28) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61% (23/15) |
| 20% (2/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 629 | Aces Total | 193 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
| 1890 | Total Double Faults | 437 |
| 1:1:30 | Average Match Time | 1:40:22 |
| 492.94 | Average Opponent Rank | 444.17 |
| 60% (14820/24780) | 1st Serve % | 62% (5251/8457) |
| 63% (9374/14820) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (3118/5251) |
| 45% (4530/9960) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (1411/3206) |
| 48% (1570/3238) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (503/1066) |
| 47% (11423/24351) | Return Points Win % | 46% (3903/8471) |
| 25% (8/24) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (16/13) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 50% (52/53) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 60% (133/87) | Challenger W/L | 45% (45/55) |
| 79% (196/53) | Futures W/L | 61% (19/12) |
| 65% (400/618) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 48% (63/132) |
| 25% (1/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 59% (74/126) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 42% (11/26) |
| 51% (87/172) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (26/53) |
| 88% (419/369) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 78% (65/51) |
| 12% (419/50) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 22% (65/14) |
| 17% (215/37) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (69/12) |
Tig vs. Urgesi Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
