Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Pamela Montez vs Lisa Zaar Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Montez vs Zaar analysis and find out who is favored!
Pamela Montez vs Lisa Zaar Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Montez has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Zaar has won 42.02%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Montez, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Zaar has won 56.3%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 52.5% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Montez has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zaar has saved 52.48% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Montez has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Zaar winning 50% (W/L 13/ 13) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Montez has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 12/ 6), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 4/ 4). Zaar has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 22/ 16), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 20/ 19).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Montez winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Montez winning 2 and Zaar winning 0. The last match between Montez and Zaar was at the W25 Malibu, 14-01-2020, Q1 round, Hard with Pamela Montez getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Montez and Zaar have played a deciding set 0 times, with Montez winning 0 times and Zaar 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Montez winning 0, and Zaar 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Montez has played against opponents with an average rank of while Zaar has played against players with an average rank of 207.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Montez has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zaar has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Montez has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zaar has converted 58.82% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Montez 1 - 0 Zaar
826
Rank
454
High
33
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
777
Rank
498
High
23
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
59% (80-55)
Career Total W/L
55% (48-40)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-1)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Pamela Montez | Lisa Zaar |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-4 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Pamela Montez | Lisa Zaar |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 45% (13/16) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.5 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 71% (65/91) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 48% (31/65) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 46% (12/26) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 54% (7/13) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 46% (37/80) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Pamela Montez Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Fanny Stollar
Player
Pamela Montez
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pamela Montez
Player
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Maja Chwalinska
Player
Pamela Montez
78%
(
50 of
64)
1st Serve %
76%
(
45 of
59)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
0
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pamela Montez
Player
Whitney Osuigwe
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
9
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pamela Montez
Player
Adriana Reami
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
41 of
72)
67
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katherine Sebov
Player
Pamela Montez
82%
(
51 of
62)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
67
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Pamela Montez
Player
Zoe Hitt
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pamela Montez
Player
Lauren Proctor
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
82)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
82)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Hina Inoue
Player
Pamela Montez
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve %
68%
(
61 of
90)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
45 of
90)
98
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Lisa Zaar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Liv Hovde
Player
Lisa Zaar
56%
(
45 of
80)
1st Serve %
71%
(
65 of
91)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
7
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
46%
(
37 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
48 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Asylzhan Arystanbekova
Player
Lisa Zaar
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
44%
(
17 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
48
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 2-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Valerija Maija Kargina
Player
Lisa Zaar
60%
(
63 of
105)
1st Serve %
69%
(
68 of
98)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
8
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
52 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
98)
100
Total Points Won
103
|
2-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lisa Zaar
Player
Anastasia Mozgaleva
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
72%
(
26 of
36)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
1
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Lisa Zaar
Player
Natalija Senic
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Lisa Zaar
Player
Valeriya Yushchenko
74%
(
64 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
1
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
27%
(
6 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
48%
(
41 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
46 of
85)
91
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(1) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lisa Zaar
Player
Tatyana Nikolenko
75%
(
84 of
112)
1st Serve %
76%
(
78 of
102)
-
Aces
-
9
Double Faults
3
55%
(
46 of
84)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
56%
(
10 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
48%
(
54 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
55 of
102)
113
Total Points Won
101
|
6-3 6-7(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lisa Zaar
Player
Timea Jaruskova
71%
(
62 of
87)
1st Serve %
72%
(
52 of
72)
1
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
3
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
41%
(
36 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
87
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lisa Zaar
Player
Iulia Andreea Ionescu
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
81%
(
42 of
52)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
1
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daria Lopatetskaya
Player
Lisa Zaar
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
77%
(
54 of
70)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
51%
(
18 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Montez Vs Zaar Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
