Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Paige Mary Hourigan vs Vicky VAN DE Peer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hourigan vs Peer analysis and find out who is favored!
Paige Mary Hourigan vs Vicky VAN DE Peer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hourigan has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Peer has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hourigan, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Peer has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hourigan has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Peer has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hourigan has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Peer winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hourigan has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 99/ 62), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 5/ 8). Peer has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hourigan has played against opponents with an average rank of while Peer has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hourigan has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Peer has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hourigan has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Peer has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hourigan 0 - 0 Peer
N/A
Rank
High
27
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Paige Mary Hourigan | Vicky VAN DE Peer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 0 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 0 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Paige Mary Hourigan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Melisa Ercan
Player
Paige Mary Hourigan
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexandra Bozovic
Player
Paige Mary Hourigan
72%
(
70 of
97)
1st Serve %
61%
(
53 of
87)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
38 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
96
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Paige Mary Hourigan
Player
Darcy Parke
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Himeno Sakatsume
Player
Paige Mary Hourigan
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
44%
(
23 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paige Mary Hourigan
Player
Milan Krish
43%
(
21 of
49)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yaroslava Bartashevich
Player
Paige Mary Hourigan
77%
(
68 of
88)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
54%
(
37 of
68)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
47%
(
41 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
45 of
81)
92
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(0) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yuka Hosoki
Player
Paige Mary Hourigan
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
50%
(
48 of
96)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
33%
(
11 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
52%
(
45 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
53 of
96)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paige Mary Hourigan
Player
Sofia Shing
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
view more
Vicky VAN DE Peer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Caroline Werner
Player
Vicky Van De Peer
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve %
78%
(
25 of
32)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
6 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
49
Total Points Won
14
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vicky Van De Peer
Player
Unknown Player
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
56%
(
23 of
41)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lavinia Tanasie
Player
Vicky Van De Peer
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
24 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
41 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katarina Kozarov
Player
Vicky Van De Peer
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
22 of
34)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
46
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 3-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vicky Van De Peer
Player
Eleejah Inisan
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
50%
(
20 of
40)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
46%
(
26 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
55
Total Points Won
63
|
0-6 6-4 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vicky Van De Peer
Player
Melissa Moueza
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
12 of
18)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
8 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Astrid Lew Yan Foon
Player
Vicky Van De Peer
76%
(
51 of
67)
1st Serve %
71%
(
40 of
56)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
0
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
30 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vicky Van De Peer
Player
Aminata Sall
76%
(
95 of
125)
1st Serve %
61%
(
72 of
118)
3
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
14
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
49 of
72)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
40%
(
50 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
49 of
118)
124
Total Points Won
119
|
6-4 6-7(2) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vicky Van De Peer
Player
Nehanda Thomias
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
48 of
73)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
4
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
48%
(
24 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
45 of
73)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Maklakova
Player
Vicky Van De Peer
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Hourigan Vs Peer Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
