Pablo Vivero Gonzalez vs Henrik TRASKIN Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gonzalez vs TRASKIN analysis and find out who is favored!
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez vs Henrik TRASKIN Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gonzalez has won 0% of points on his second serve, while TRASKIN has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gonzalez, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while TRASKIN has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gonzalez has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas TRASKIN has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gonzalez has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with TRASKIN winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gonzalez has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 69% (W/L 291/ 133), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 31% (W/L 11/ 24). TRASKIN has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gonzalez has played against opponents with an average rank of while TRASKIN has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gonzalez has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while TRASKIN has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gonzalez has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and TRASKIN has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gonzalez 0 - 0 TRASKIN
13
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
28
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Pablo Vivero Gonzalez | Henrik TRASKIN |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Aces pg | 0 | N/A |
Aces Total | 0 | N/A |
DFs per game | 0 | N/A |
DFs Total | 0 | N/A |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | N/A |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Benjamin Winter Lopez
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
61%
(
14 of
23)
1st Serve %
44%
(
15 of
34)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
93%
(
13 of
14)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
3 of
23)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
39
Total Points Won
18
|
6-2 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Calvin Hemery
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
10 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Harry Wendelken
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
20 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Reese Stalder
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
53%
(
29 of
55)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Rincon
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Arthur Fils
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Max Alcala Gurri
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Antoine Escoffier
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
51%
(
53 of
103)
1st Serve %
71%
(
83 of
117)
12
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
8
83%
(
44 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
50 of
83)
46%
(
23 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
36 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
49 of
117)
116
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
Player
Lluc Mir Anglada
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
10
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Alvaro Lopez San Martin
Player
Pablo Vivero Gonzalez
60%
(
68 of
113)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
95)
10
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
41%
(
46 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
95)
105
Total Points Won
103
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Henrik TRASKIN Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 4-6 7-6(6) 15-13 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 0-6 6-4 10-7 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Evgenii Tiurnev
Player
Henrik Traskin
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve %
90%
(
36 of
40)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
53
Total Points Won
22
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Henrik Traskin
Player
S D Prajwal Dev
75%
(
65 of
87)
1st Serve %
64%
(
59 of
92)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
93
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 7-6(3) 5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
Q2 | 4-6 6-4 10-7 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Faris Zakaryia
Player
Henrik Traskin
55%
(
47 of
86)
1st Serve %
77%
(
63 of
82)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
45%
(
39 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
83
|
0-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H |
view more