Pablo Carreno-Busta vs Jakub Paul Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L L L W L L
Form
W L L W W L W W L LH2H: Carreno-Busta 1 - 0 Paul
They have played 2 sets in total, with Carreno-Busta winning 2 and Paul winning 0. The last match between Carreno-Busta and Paul was at the Madrid Challenger, 08-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Pablo Carreno-Busta getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Pablo Carreno-Busta | 1 |
| Jakub Paul | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Madrid Challenger(08-04-2025)
Pablo Carreno-Busta
Jakub Paul
6
2
6
1
| Carreno-Busta | Stats | Paul |
|---|---|---|
| 59% (20-14) | YTD Win/Loss | 65% (20-11) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 100 | Ranking | 331 |
| 10 | Highest Rank | 325 |
| 33 | Age | 26 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 32 | Titles | 5 |
| 63% (590-341) | Career Total W/L | 56% (224-174) |
| $10,373,805 | Career Prize Money | $2,285 |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Basilashvili VS Vacherot PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris atp
21 May 2025 / Q2 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Arnaldi VS Djokovic PREDICTION Clay
Gonet Geneva Open - Geneva atp
22 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Carreno-Busta VS Paul H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Pablo Carreno-Busta
Player
Jakub Paul
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve %
71%
(
27 of
38)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
||||
Carreno-Busta VS Paul H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 0:57:8 | Average Match Time | 0:57:8 |
| 51% (27/53) | 1st Serve % | 71% (27/38) |
| 67% (18/27) | 1st Serve Win % | 41% (11/27) |
| 62% (16/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 27% (3/11) |
| 100% (5/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 63% (24/38) | Return Points Win % | 36% (19/53) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Carreno-Busta vs Paul Match Preview :
When analyzing the upcoming tennis match, reviewing recent second serve performance provides key insights. In the past six months, Paul has secured 44.83% of points on their second serve, while Carreno-Busta has achieved 43.11%. These figures have a strong correlation with match prediction accuracy, suggesting a slight edge for Paul.
Return game statistics further shape the comparison between the two players. Recently, Paul has excelled in winning 46.7% of opponents' second serve points, slightly surpassing Carreno-Busta's 46.5%. For first serve returns, Paul also leads at 29.18%, compared to Carreno-Busta's 25.54%, which can be a significant factor in determining the favorite in their head-to-head encounter.
Under pressure, analyzing breakpoint saved percentages offers additional insights. Carreno-Busta has saved 58.04% of breakpoints, slightly outpacing Paul's 55.28%. This can be valuable for in-game betting predictions, especially in crucial moments of the match.
Considering the performance overview over the past year, Paul has claimed victory in 64.47% of matches (W/L 49/27), whereas Carreno-Busta's win rate stands at 56.25% (W/L 27/21). These statistics form a comprehensive head-to-head prediction overview, indicating Paul's higher consistency.
Evaluating career surface performances, Paul's best win percentage is on Hard courts at 65% (W/L 77/42), whereas their weakest is on I.hard at 53% (W/L 45/40). Contrarily, Carreno-Busta thrives on Clay with a 66% win rate (W/L 344/175) but struggles on Grass, winning just 30% (W/L 6/14). These surface statistics highlight potential advantages based on the playing surface.
When considering player level and opponent quality, in the last year, Paul has predominantly played in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, with a success rate of 67.27% (W/L 37/18). Meanwhile, Carreno-Busta has also focused on similar level competitions, winning 72.22% of matches (W/L 13/5). On average, Paul has faced opponents ranked 348.26, whereas Carreno-Busta's opponents have been stronger, averaging a rank of 150.75.
For deciding set performance, Paul has shown greater resilience, winning 56% of deciding sets in the past 12 months, compared to Carreno-Busta's 43%. This could be crucial if the match extends to a deciding set.
In terms of break point conversion, Paul has been efficient with a conversion rate of 30.66%, higher than Carreno-Busta's 26.28%, making break point opportunities a pivotal aspect of in-game strategies.
Overall, considering these statistical insights and recent performances, Paul seems to have a marginal advantage in predicting the outcome of this match, largely due to superior second serve performance and return game statistics.
Carreno-Busta vs Paul Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Pablo Carreno-Busta Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Pablo Carreno-Busta
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
69%
(
52 of
75)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
76
|
6-2 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roman Andres Burruchaga
Player
Pablo Carreno-Busta
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
99)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
64)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
35 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
99)
98
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pablo Carreno-Busta
Player
Thiago Agustin Tirante
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
67
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(5) 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nuno Borges
Player
Pablo Carreno-Busta
59%
(
63 of
106)
1st Serve %
57%
(
56 of
99)
10
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
50 of
63)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
43 of
56)
65%
(
28 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
28 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
28 of
99)
106
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(7) 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Fils
Player
Pablo Carreno-Busta
73%
(
52 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
20 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Pablo Carreno-Busta
66%
(
62 of
94)
1st Serve %
73%
(
83 of
114)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
49 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
56 of
83)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
28 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
47 of
114)
113
Total Points Won
95
|
6-7(10) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pablo Carreno-Busta
Player
Calvin Hemery
65%
(
73 of
113)
1st Serve %
72%
(
86 of
119)
6
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
55 of
86)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
36%
(
41 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
49 of
119)
121
Total Points Won
111
|
6-4 5-7 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pablo Carreno-Busta
Player
Jakub Paul
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve %
71%
(
27 of
38)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Jakub Paul Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Player
Jakub Paul
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Jakub Paul
72%
(
67 of
93)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
47%
(
44 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
90
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Marko Topo
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Florian Broska
59%
(
60 of
102)
1st Serve %
61%
(
55 of
90)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
45 of
60)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
41 of
55)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
37 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
90)
94
Total Points Won
98
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pablo Carreno-Busta
Player
Jakub Paul
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve %
71%
(
27 of
38)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Pedro Cachin
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
3
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
80
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Nikoloz Basilashvili
68%
(
63 of
93)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
75)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
37 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
90
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Jakub Paul
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (590/341) | Win/Loss | 56% (224/174) |
| 60% (1385/912) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (499/400) |
| 54% (11730/10187) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (4381/4051) |
| 65% (186/100) | Hard Win/Loss | 65% (77/42) |
| 66% (347/180) | Clay Win/Loss | 55% (90/75) |
| 52% (51/47) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (57/57) |
| 30% (6/14) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 2772 | Aces Total | 638 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 1332 | Total Double Faults | 887 |
| 1:20:39 | Average Match Time | 1:30:39 |
| 106.39 | Average Opponent Rank | 451.99 |
| 64% (34423/53978) | 1st Serve % | 62% (15937/25714) |
| 70% (23999/34423) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (10323/15937) |
| 52% (10142/19550) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (4828/9787) |
| 42% (2210/5321) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1275/2821) |
| 39% (21282/54580) | Return Points Win % | 42% (10775/25475) |
| 60% (58/39) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (70/62) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (10/8) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (167/129) | Main Tour W/L | 17% (1/5) |
| 0% (0/2) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 70% (136/57) | Challenger W/L | 56% (64/51) |
| 77% (144/43) | Futures W/L | 57% (159/118) |
| 64% (523/819) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (218/392) |
| 59% (59/100) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (4/4) |
| 56% (201/357) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (60/106) |
| 55% (162/296) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (48/101) |
| 86% (577/497) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (222/191) |
| 14% (577/78) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (222/30) |
| 26% (352/91) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (176/32) |
Carreno-Busta vs. Paul Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
