Pablo Carreno-Busta vs Gauthier Onclin Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L W L L W W L
Form
L L W L W W W L W LHead To Head: Carreno-Busta 0 - 0 Onclin
| Carreno-Busta | Stats | Onclin |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | ||
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | N/A |
| Highest Rank | N/A | |
| 33 | Age | 24 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 32 | Titles | 13 |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Norrie VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
08 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fritz VS Khachanov PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
08 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Carreno-Busta VS Onclin H2H Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Carreno-Busta VS Onclin H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 6 | Games Won | 12 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:21:18 | Average Match Time | 1:21:18 |
| 46% (28/61) | 1st Serve % | 70% (35/50) |
| 57% (16/28) | 1st Serve Win % | 80% (28/35) |
| 39% (13/33) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (5/15) |
| 40% (2/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (5/11) |
| 34% (17/50) | Return Points Win % | 52% (32/61) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Carreno-Busta vs Onclin Match Preview :
- In recent form, Carreno-Busta has shown slightly better performance on second serves, winning 43.63% of points compared to Onclin’s 41.41%.
- When examining return games, Onclin excels in recent play, winning 51.13% of their opponent's second serve points, while Carreno-Busta captures 44.98%.
- How do they fare against first serves? Onclin again leads, securing 31.92% versus Carreno-Busta’s 25.74%.
- Under pressure, Carreno-Busta remains steadier by saving 57.99% of breakpoints, compared to Onclin's 49.32% save rate.
- Overall performance over the last year favors Onclin, who boasts a 68.83% win rate, whereas Carreno-Busta sits at 55.93%.
- Surface preferences reveal Carreno-Busta’s strength on clay with a 66% win rate, while Onclin thrives on hard courts at 65%.
- Analyzing the level of play, Carreno-Busta competes mostly in higher-tier Challengers/ITF events, winning 73.91%, while Onclin has a higher success rate in lower-tier ITF events at 81.63%.
- On average, Carreno-Busta faces higher-ranked opponents (148.42) compared to Onclin’s opponents (309.01), suggesting Carreno-Busta faces tougher competition.
- In deciding sets, Onclin holds a significant advantage, winning 75% compared to Carreno-Busta's 37% success rate.
- Onclin also leads in breakpoint conversions, capitalizing on 38.57% of opportunities versus Carreno-Busta’s 29.26%.
Editorial Prediction (June 13, 2025, UTC):
As we analyze the upcoming match, recent performance trends highlight distinct strengths and strategies for both players. Onclin has demonstrated superior return game statistics, winning higher percentages of points on both first and second serve returns. This could give them an edge in dictating play and creating more breakpoint opportunities.
Carreno-Busta, while showing resilience in saving breakpoints, plays against higher-ranked opponents more frequently, suggesting a familiarity with facing stronger competition. Their success on clay could also play a role if the surface suits their game style.
Nevertheless, Onclin's consistent performance in deciding sets and his ability to convert breakpoints more effectively may prove crucial in tight moments. The statistics suggest that if the match extends to critical points, Onclin’s strength could shine.
Given these insights, Onclin appears more likely to claim victory in this matchup, assuming they maintain their recent form. Their strengths in return games and breakpoint conversion potentially provide the decisive edge needed to succeed.
Carreno-Busta vs Onclin Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Pablo Carreno-Busta Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Gauthier Onclin
Player
Pablo Carreno-Busta
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
46%
(
28 of
61)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
7
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pablo Carreno-Busta
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pablo Carreno-Busta
Player
Titouan Droguet
71%
(
59 of
83)
1st Serve %
49%
(
35 of
72)
4
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
72)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denis Yevseyev
Player
Pablo Carreno-Busta
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Frances Tiafoe
Player
Pablo Carreno-Busta
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
52 of
85)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
14 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pablo Carreno-Busta
Player
Francisco Comesana
66%
(
78 of
118)
1st Serve %
55%
(
58 of
106)
0
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
56 of
78)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
42 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
48 of
106)
124
Total Points Won
100
|
6-2 7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Pablo Carreno-Busta
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
69%
(
52 of
75)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
76
|
6-2 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roman Andres Burruchaga
Player
Pablo Carreno-Busta
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
99)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
64)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
35 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
99)
98
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Gauthier Onclin Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Gauthier Onclin
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
30 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gauthier Onclin
Player
Constant Lestienne
66%
(
62 of
94)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
85)
92
Total Points Won
87
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Daniel Merida Aguilar
Player
Gauthier Onclin
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gauthier Onclin
Player
Pablo Carreno-Busta
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
46%
(
28 of
61)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
7
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gauthier Onclin
Player
Lucas Poullain
64%
(
61 of
96)
1st Serve %
52%
(
43 of
82)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
45%
(
43 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
41 of
82)
94
Total Points Won
84
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gauthier Onclin
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
43%
(
36 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Gauthier Onclin
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
64%
(
28 of
44)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gauthier Onclin
Player
Francesco Maestrelli
66%
(
69 of
104)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
98)
5
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
3
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
38%
(
39 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
104
Total Points Won
98
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (593/344) | Win/Loss | 62% (231/139) |
| 60% (1392/919) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (507/346) |
| 53% (11799/10257) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (4235/3667) |
| 65% (186/100) | Hard Win/Loss | 65% (80/44) |
| 66% (350/183) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (103/66) |
| 52% (51/47) | Indoor Hard W/L | 64% (46/26) |
| 30% (6/14) | Grass Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 2786 | Aces Total | 510 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 1353 | Total Double Faults | 975 |
| 1:20:50 | Average Match Time | 1:42:31 |
| 475.18 | Average Opponent Rank | 425.76 |
| 64% (34721/54457) | 1st Serve % | 60% (15181/25114) |
| 70% (24203/34721) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (10004/15181) |
| 52% (10229/19731) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (4902/9932) |
| 42% (2225/5356) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (1392/2997) |
| 39% (21446/55011) | Return Points Win % | 44% (11309/25587) |
| 60% (59/40) | Slam W/L | 50% (7/7) |
| 53% (70/62) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (10/8) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (167/129) | Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/2) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 70% (138/59) | Challenger W/L | 52% (58/54) |
| 77% (144/43) | Futures W/L | 68% (165/76) |
| 64% (525/823) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (230/367) |
| 59% (60/102) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 57% (203/359) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (50/89) |
| 55% (162/296) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (67/111) |
| 86% (580/500) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (220/196) |
| 13% (580/78) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (220/24) |
| 26% (355/91) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (150/35) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
