Oskar Grzegorzewski vs Cade Birrell Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W L W W W L
Form
W L W L L W L L W LHead-2-Head: Grzegorzewski 1 - 0 Birrell
They have played 3 sets in total, with Grzegorzewski winning 2 and Birrell winning 1. The last match between Grzegorzewski and Birrell was at the M15 Monastir, 05-05-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Oskar Grzegorzewski getting the victory 7-5 4-6 10-7.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Oskar Grzegorzewski | 1 |
| Cade Birrell | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M15 Monastir(05-05-2025)
Oskar Grzegorzewski
Cade Birrell
7
5
4
6
10
7
| Grzegorzewski | Stats | Birrell |
|---|---|---|
| 75% (12-4) | YTD Win/Loss | 44% (7-9) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | N/A |
| Highest Rank | N/A | |
| 20 | Age | 25 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 56% (40-31) | Career Total W/L | 39% (57-89) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Diallo VS Clar PREDICTION Grass
Mallorca Championships - Mallorca atp
22 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Darderi VS Giron PREDICTION Grass
Rothesay International - Eastbourne atp
22 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Grzegorzewski VS Birrell H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 4-6 10-7 |
Stats 
Oskar Grzegorzewski
Player
Cade Birrell
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
Grzegorzewski VS Birrell H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 21 | Games Won | 18 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:2:44 | Average Match Time | 2:2:44 |
| 74% (49/66) | 1st Serve % | 61% (41/67) |
| 65% (32/49) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (24/41) |
| 47% (8/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (13/26) |
| 80% (4/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 67% (4/6) |
| 45% (30/67) | Return Points Win % | 39% (26/66) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Grzegorzewski vs Birrell Match Preview :
In analyzing the second serve performance over the past six months, Grzegorzewski demonstrates a slight edge by winning 42.55% of points compared to Birrell's 39.79%. This difference, albeit marginal, plays a critical role in the accuracy of match predictions. Furthermore, first serve return stats favor Grzegorzewski, who has successfully won 35.19% of points, outperforming Birrell, who has claimed 27.27%. Such statistics are influential in determining who might be favored in this upcoming head-to-head clash.
Shifting focus to return game statistics, Birrell shows a stronger performance by winning 51.6% of their opponents' second serve points, while Grzegorzewski has captured 40%. The ability to return effectively is crucial, and it suggests Birrell's potential dominance in this aspect of the game. Additionally, under pressure, Birrell has managed to save 58.23% of breakpoints, clearly outperforming Grzegorzewski’s 44.44%. This difference plays into in-game betting predictions, indicating Birrell’s resilience during crucial game moments.
Performance throughout the year adds another layer of analysis. Birrell has claimed victory in 45.45% of matches (15 wins, 18 losses), whereas Grzegorzewski boasts a better win rate of 54.17% (13 wins, 11 losses). This overview provides a comprehensive head-to-head prediction. Examining favorite surfaces, Grzegorzewski thrives on indoor hard courts with a 60% success rate, overshadowing Birrell’s best surface performance on grass at 45%. On clay, both players struggle, with Grzegorzewski having a slightly better win percentage.
When it comes to experience and competition level, both players have primarily competed in the ITF Futures/Satellites $10K tournaments. Grzegorzewski has a winning percentage of 54.17%, whereas Birrell stands at 45.16%. Their choice of competition level is pivotal to interpreting the relative quality of their performances. Furthermore, analyzing opponent quality, Birrell faced opponents with an average rank of 40.42 in the past year, suggesting a higher level of competition compared to Grzegorzewski’s opponents, who had an average rank of 87.88.
Deciding set performance over the past year reveals Birrell’s superior ability to clinch tight matches, winning 54% of these scenarios compared to Grzegorzewski's 33%. This lends insight into Birrell's persistence and mental fortitude in crucial moments. Additionally, recent form reveals Grzegorzewski as more effective in converting breakpoints, with a 60% conversion rate, surpassing Birrell’s 46.34%. Such proficiency may impact live betting odds when breakpoint opportunities arise.
In conclusion, although Birrell displays a strong return game and resilience under pressure, Grzegorzewski's overall win percentage, superior breakpoint conversion, and favorable surface stats suggest a slight advantage. Considering these factors and current form, Grzegorzewski is predicted to triumph in this matchup.
Grzegorzewski vs Birrell Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Oskar Grzegorzewski Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Stefan Palosi
Player
Oskar Grzegorzewski
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oskar Grzegorzewski
Player
Andrea Bacaloni
54%
(
48 of
89)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
45%
(
40 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 3-6 7-6(4) 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Dan Alexandru Tomescu
Player
Oskar Grzegorzewski
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Oskar Grzegorzewski
Player
Dragos Nicolae Cazacu
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
69%
(
29 of
42)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
47
Total Points Won
36
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oskar Grzegorzewski
Player
Aleksander Chayka
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve %
40%
(
14 of
35)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
63%
(
10 of
16)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
38%
(
11 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
37
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 4-6 11-9 | H2H | |||
view more
Cade Birrell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF | 7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Oskar Grzegorzewski
Player
Cade Birrell
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 4-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 3-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(4) 6-7(2) 11-9 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Raghav Jaisinghani
Player
Cade Birrell
52%
(
31 of
60)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-3 10-6 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (40/31) | Win/Loss | 39% (57/89) |
| 56% (89/71) | Sets Win/Loss | 40% (135/200) |
| 52% (820/754) | Games Win/Loss | 47% (1593/1794) |
| 54% (22/19) | Hard Win/Loss | 40% (41/61) |
| 60% (15/10) | Clay Win/Loss | 27% (6/16) |
| 60% (3/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 45% (10/12) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 75 | Aces Total | 159 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 107 | Total Double Faults | 218 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 181.75 | Average Opponent Rank | 116.83 |
| 63% (1284/2029) | 1st Serve % | 59% (1726/2931) |
| 65% (833/1284) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (1140/1726) |
| 45% (337/745) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (513/1205) |
| 53% (92/172) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (105/232) |
| 41% (830/2035) | Return Points Win % | 38% (1057/2802) |
| 0% (0/1) | Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 57% (40/30) | Futures W/L | 39% (56/88) |
| 56% (39/70) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 39% (57/146) |
| 75% (9/12) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 34% (12/35) |
| 47% (9/19) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (22/43) |
| 89% (38/34) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (57/48) |
| 11% (38/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (57/9) |
| 18% (33/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (89/9) |
Grzegorzewski vs. Birrell Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
