Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Omni Kumar vs Yasutaka Uchiyama Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kumar vs Uchiyama analysis and find out who is favored!
Omni Kumar vs Yasutaka Uchiyama Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kumar has won 55.17% of points on his second serve, while Uchiyama has won 52.71%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kumar, in recent form, has won 57.72% of his opponent's second serve points, while Uchiyama has won 50.95%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.76% and 31.71% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kumar has saved 51.98% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Uchiyama has saved 63.19% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kumar has won 65.88% of matches played (W/L 56/ 29), with Uchiyama winning 62.71% (W/L 37/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kumar has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 234/ 130), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 3/ 9). Uchiyama has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 312/ 219), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 35% (W/L 9/ 17).
- Player level: In the last year, Kumar has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 76.27% of matches (W/L 45/ 14), where as Uchiyama has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.04% of matches (W/L 35/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kumar has played against opponents with an average rank of 192.79 while Uchiyama has played against players with an average rank of 258.54.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kumar has won 64% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Uchiyama has won 76% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kumar has converted 46.18% of breakpoint opportunities, and Uchiyama has converted 42.52% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kumar 0 - 0 Uchiyama
350
Rank
348
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
167
Rank
78
High
31
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
63% (241-142)
Career Total W/L
56% (427-336)
61% (11-7)
YTD W/L
71% (15-6)
$20,500
Career Prize Money
$267,515
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Omni Kumar | Yasutaka Uchiyama |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 61% (11/7) | 71% (15/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 57% (24/18) | 62% (31/19) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (205/177) | 55% (251/209) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 62% (8/5) | 76% (13/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.21 | 0.52 |
| Aces Total | 39 | 118 |
| DFs per game | 0.14 | 0.13 |
| DFs Total | 26 | 30 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:54:38 | 1:43:37 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 196.44 | 319.33 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (804/1239) | 63% (929/1473) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (515/804) | 73% (677/929) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (231/435) | 53% (286/544) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (60/124) | 40% (57/143) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (512/1212) | 39% (584/1506) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (2/2) | 71% (15/6) |
| Futures W/L | 64% (9/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 61% (11/18) | 71% (15/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 71% (5/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (4/6) | 88% (7/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 89% (9/8) | 92% (12/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 11% (9/1) | 8% (12/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (9/3) | 44% (9/4) |
Omni Kumar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats 
Kirill Kivattsev
Player
Omni Kumar
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
76%
(
44 of
58)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Michele Ribecai
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
5
52%
(
27 of
52)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
46%
(
32 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(1) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Simon Beaupain
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
75%
(
33 of
44)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Kiyan Santino Kasemi
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefano Reitano
Player
Omni Kumar
61%
(
56 of
92)
1st Serve %
73%
(
74 of
101)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
38 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
101)
98
Total Points Won
95
|
6-2 1-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Trevor Svajda
Player
Omni Kumar
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Elijah Strode
64%
(
57 of
89)
1st Serve %
54%
(
47 of
87)
0
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
6
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
87)
90
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andres Andrade
Player
Omni Kumar
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
72%
(
47 of
65)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Toby Martin
69%
(
60 of
87)
1st Serve %
61%
(
66 of
109)
7
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
27 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
109)
107
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(6) 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Dian Nedev
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Yasutaka Uchiyama Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Seong Chan Hong
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
James Duckworth
58%
(
69 of
119)
1st Serve %
50%
(
52 of
105)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
7
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
48%
(
24 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
46 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
105)
116
Total Points Won
108
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Paul Jubb
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
55%
(
52 of
94)
11
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
94)
98
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Dane Sweeny
61%
(
58 of
95)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
10
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
39 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
86)
98
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
23 of
37)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Yasutaka Uchiyama
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
73%
(
36 of
49)
16
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Jan Choinski
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
70%
(
54 of
77)
8
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
40 of
54)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
14 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
25 of
77)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Arthur Gea
Player
Yasutaka Uchiyama
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Jakub Paul
45%
(
29 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Yasutaka Uchiyama
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
64%
(
28 of
44)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
50
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Kumar Vs Uchiyama Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
