Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Olivia Gadecki vs Qiang Wang Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gadecki vs Wang analysis and find out who is favored!
Olivia Gadecki vs Qiang Wang Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gadecki has won 45.6% of points on his second serve, while Wang has won 41.75%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gadecki, in recent form, has won 56.08% of his opponent's second serve points, while Wang has won 48.39%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.79% and 45.28% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gadecki has saved 55.92% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wang has saved 54.05% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gadecki has won 54.41% of matches played (W/L 37/ 31), with Wang winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gadecki has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 105/ 53), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 3/ 6). Wang has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 299/ 185), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 35/ 36).
- Player level: In the last year, Gadecki has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.81% of matches (W/L 24/ 19), where as Wang has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 2/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gadecki winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Gadecki winning 0 and Wang winning 2. The last match between Gadecki and Wang was at the Adelaide International - Adelaide, 22-02-2021, First, Hard with Qiang Wang getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:21:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gadecki and Wang have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gadecki winning 0 times and Wang 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gadecki winning 0, and Wang 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gadecki has played against opponents with an average rank of 257.09 while Wang has played against players with an average rank of 32.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gadecki has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wang has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gadecki has converted 44.59% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wang has converted 47.37% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gadecki 0 - 1 Wang
165
Rank
120
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
806
Rank
12
High
32
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
64% (156-89)
Career Total W/L
59% (403-278)
42% (8-11)
YTD W/L
50% (2-2)
$296,744
Career Prize Money
$3,853,637
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Olivia Gadecki | Qiang Wang |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 7 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:21:0 | 1:21:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (44/66) | 61% (33/54) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 61% (27/44) | 88% (29/33) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 45% (10/22) | 33% (7/21) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 40% (4/10) |
| Return Points W% | 33% (18/54) | 44% (29/66) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Qiang Wang
Player
Olivia Gadecki
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Olivia Gadecki | Qiang Wang |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 42% (8/11) | 50% (2/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 45% (19/23) | 56% (5/4) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (188/197) | 51% (42/40) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (7/7) | 50% (2/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.33 | 0.2 |
| Aces Total | 62 | 8 |
| DFs per game | 0.41 | 0.17 |
| DFs Total | 77 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:30:54 | 1:46:32 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 172.11 | 32.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (752/1222) | 63% (173/276) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (482/752) | 61% (106/173) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (208/470) | 42% (43/103) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (64/155) | 47% (18/38) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (558/1277) | 47% (132/283) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (5/5) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 43% (3/4) | 67% (2/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 42% (8/19) | 50% (2/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 25% (1/4) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (8/7) | 67% (3/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (8/1) | 33% (3/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 9% (11/1) | 0% (1/0) |
Olivia Gadecki Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Greetje Minnen
Player
Olivia Gadecki
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
7
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Olivia Gadecki
55%
(
42 of
77)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
90)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
38%
(
8 of
21)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
51%
(
39 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
51 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Olivia Gadecki
Player
Eleni Christofi
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valentini Grammatikopoulou
Player
Olivia Gadecki
61%
(
81 of
133)
1st Serve %
63%
(
66 of
105)
8
Aces
4
11
Double Faults
11
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
44%
(
23 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
43%
(
57 of
133)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
105)
122
Total Points Won
116
|
4-6 7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nikola Bartunkova
Player
Olivia Gadecki
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
3
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
4
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaqueline Cristian
Player
Olivia Gadecki
49%
(
43 of
88)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
10
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
88
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Olivia Gadecki
Player
Usue Maitane Arconada
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Olivia Gadecki
Player
Dalma Galfi
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
83
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Olivia Gadecki
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Danielle Rose Collins
Player
Olivia Gadecki
44%
(
33 of
75)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
7
Aces
4
11
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Qiang Wang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Han Shi
Player
Qiang Wang
57%
(
58 of
102)
1st Serve %
63%
(
75 of
120)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
44 of
75)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
17 of
45)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
44%
(
45 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
59 of
120)
116
Total Points Won
106
|
3-6 7-6(8) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Qiang Wang
Player
Lanlana Tararudee
68%
(
54 of
80)
1st Serve %
46%
(
39 of
85)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Qiang Wang
Player
Shutong Qu
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Xiyu Wang
Player
Qiang Wang
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve %
49%
(
19 of
39)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
51
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Qiang Wang
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
1
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Qiang Wang
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Qiang Wang
Player
Yanina Wickmayer
80%
(
88 of
110)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
51%
(
45 of
88)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
52%
(
57 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Qiang Wang
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
65%
(
52 of
80)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
50%
(
39 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
47 of
80)
86
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Qiang Wang
Player
Liv Hovde
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
57%
(
24 of
42)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
20 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Coco Vandeweghe
Player
Qiang Wang
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Gadecki Vs Wang Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Qiang Wang
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
