Oliver Marach vs Pol Wattanakul Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Marach vs Wattanakul analysis and find out who is favored!
Oliver Marach vs Pol Wattanakul Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Marach has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Wattanakul has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Marach, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Wattanakul has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Marach has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wattanakul has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Marach has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Wattanakul winning 59.09% (W/L 13/ 9) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Marach has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 184/ 158), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 2/ 8). Wattanakul has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 5/ 5), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 29% (W/L 2/ 5).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Marach winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Marach winning 2 and Wattanakul winning 0. The last match between Marach and Wattanakul was at the PTT Thailand Open - Bangkok, 21-09-2013, Q1 round, I.hard with Oliver Marach getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:55:33.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Marach and Wattanakul have played a deciding set 0 times, with Marach winning 0 times and Wattanakul 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Marach winning 0, and Wattanakul 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Marach has played against opponents with an average rank of while Wattanakul has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Marach has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wattanakul has won 75% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Marach has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wattanakul has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Marach 1 - 0 Wattanakul
6
Total
0
Mast
5
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
Ret.
Rank
82
High
43
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
631
Rank
598
High
28
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
50% (255-254)
Career Total W/L
45% (112-139)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$145,705
Career Prize Money
$2,420
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Marach VS Wattanakul H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Oliver Marach | Pol Wattanakul |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 3 |
Aces (Total) | 6 | 8 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
Avg Match Time | 0:55:33 | 0:55:33 |
1st Serve % | 60% (26/43) | 53% (27/51) |
1st Serve Win% | 88% (23/26) | 63% (17/27) |
2nd Serve Win% | 65% (11/17) | 33% (8/24) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 51% (26/51) | 21% (9/43) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Marach VS Wattanakul H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-0 |
Oliver Marach
Player
Pol Wattanakul
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
6
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
3
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Oliver Marach | Pol Wattanakul |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Oliver Marach Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Marco Chiudinelli
Player
Oliver Marach
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
57%
(
21 of
37)
5
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
17 of
21)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
43
Total Points Won
34
|
7-5 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Steven Diez
Player
Oliver Marach
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve %
47%
(
22 of
47)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sergey Betov
Player
Oliver Marach
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
Rubber 5 |
Oliver Marach
Player
Jesse Huta Galung
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
11
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nicolas Mahut
Player
Oliver Marach
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
50%
(
25 of
50)
8
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
3
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Somdev Devvarman
Player
Oliver Marach
68%
(
58 of
85)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
83
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Oliver Marach
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
41%
(
23 of
56)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
5
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Alejandro Gonzalez
Player
Oliver Marach
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
42%
(
31 of
74)
5
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
6
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Oliver Marach
Player
Frank Moser
63%
(
52 of
82)
1st Serve %
53%
(
37 of
70)
12
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
29 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Peter Torebko
Player
Oliver Marach
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve %
50%
(
16 of
32)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
40%
(
2 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
11 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
40
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H |
view more
Pol Wattanakul Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Maximus Jones
Player
Pol Wattanakul
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
48%
(
39 of
82)
4
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
11
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
31 of
39)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Pol Wattanakul
Player
Kody Pearson
67%
(
63 of
94)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
2
Aces
4
10
Double Faults
7
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
35%
(
33 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
94)
100
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Thanapet Chanta
Player
Pol Wattanakul
54%
(
58 of
107)
1st Serve %
65%
(
73 of
112)
2
Aces
17
1
Double Faults
11
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
56 of
73)
53%
(
26 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
11 of
39)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
38%
(
41 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
45 of
112)
111
Total Points Won
108
|
5-7 7-6(3) 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Chukang Wang
Player
Pol Wattanakul
72%
(
67 of
93)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
0
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
7
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
37 of
46)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
83)
91
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Pol Wattanakul
Player
Tao Mu
51%
(
58 of
114)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
101)
8
Aces
6
13
Double Faults
3
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
47 of
62)
48%
(
27 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
42 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
32 of
101)
104
Total Points Won
111
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Pol Wattanakul
Player
Jimmy Yang
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jeremy Jin
Player
Pol Wattanakul
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
47%
(
36 of
77)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
9
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
43 of
77)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Pol Wattanakul
Player
He Ziheng
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
3
95%
(
20 of
21)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
52
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H |
view more