Oliver Crawford vs Ethan Quinn Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W W L W W W L
Form
W W L L W W W L W LHead To Head: Crawford 1 - 2 Quinn
They have played 7 sets in total, with Crawford winning 3 and Quinn winning 4. The last match between Crawford and Quinn was at the Mallorca Championships - Mallorca, 21-06-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Grass, with Ethan Quinn getting the victory 4-6 7-6(5) 7-6(3).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Oliver Crawford | 1 |
| Ethan Quinn | 2 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Mallorca Championships - Mallorca(21-06-2025)
Ethan Quinn
Oliver Crawford
4
6
7
6
7
6
| Crawford | Stats | Quinn |
|---|---|---|
| 77% (50-15) | YTD Win/Loss | 64% (34-19) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| 234 | Ranking | 82 |
| 190 | Highest Rank | 82 |
| 26 | Age | 21 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 13 | Titles | 4 |
| 69% (312-140) | Career Total W/L | 58% (122-87) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $634,075 |
| 4 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sharma VS Buzarnescu PREDICTION Hard
Prague Open - Prague wta
20 Jul 2025 / Q3
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Cazaux VS Buse PREDICTION Clay
Generali Open - Kitzbuhel atp
20 Jul 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 7-6(5) 7-6(3) |
Stats 
Ethan Quinn
Player
Oliver Crawford
55%
(
60 of
109)
1st Serve %
58%
(
75 of
130)
16
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
8
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
54 of
75)
55%
(
27 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
34 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
46 of
130)
121
Total Points Won
118
|
||||
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Oliver Crawford
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats
Oliver Crawford
Player
Ethan Quinn
81%
(
38 of
47)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
61)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 36 | Games Won | 36 |
| 13 | Aces (Total) | 26 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:51:56 | Average Match Time | 1:51:56 |
| 63% (143/228) | 1st Serve % | 55% (126/229) |
| 72% (103/143) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (92/126) |
| 53% (45/85) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (53/103) |
| 39% (7/18) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (6/12) |
| 37% (84/229) | Return Points Win % | 35% (80/228) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Crawford vs Quinn Match Preview :
- Crawford currently wins 44.95% of points on their second serve in the last six months, while Quinn has a slightly better rate at 47.61%. Could Quinn's marginally stronger second serve give them an advantage?
- When it comes to returning, Crawford captures 45.35% of their opponent's second serves, slightly behind Quinn's 46.34%. However, Crawford has a superior edge in first serve returns at 28.19%, compared to Quinn's 26.26%.
- Under pressure, both players save nearly the same percentage of breakpoints, with Crawford saving 55.69% and Quinn saving 55.76%. Does this suggest a close match when faced with breakpoints?
- Looking at match success over the past year, Crawford has a win rate of 73.75%, distinctly higher than Quinn's 58.97% win rate, which could be significant in predicting the match outcome.
- Crawford excels most on hard courts with a 71% career win rate, whereas Quinn performs best on indoor hard courts at 61%. Could the surface of the match influence the result?
- While Crawford largely competes in Futures/ITF events with an 80% win rate, Quinn faces tougher competition in Challenger/ITF tournaments with a win rate of 58.97%.
- Head-to-head history shows an even split: 1 win each, with total sets tied at 2-2. Most recently, Quinn won their encounter at the Savannah Challenger on clay.
- The average duration of their matches is around 1 hour and 23 minutes, suggesting competitive bouts.
- No tiebreaks or deciding sets have been played in their contests before, adding curiosity about how the match might unfold if it becomes tightly contested.
- In the last year, Crawford generally competes against lower-ranked opponents (average rank 447.43), compared to Quinn, who faces higher-ranked competition (average rank 184.92).
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Crawford has won 69% of these sets, giving them the edge over Quinn, who wins 55% in such scenarios.
- Recently, Crawford has been better at converting break points, with a 34.48% conversion rate compared to Quinn's 32.32% rate, possibly influencing in-game momentum shifts.
Editorial Prediction (June 21, 2025, UTC):
Crawford and Quinn present an intriguing match-up with their contrasting strengths. Crawford's remarkable win rate over the past year highlights their consistency and success, especially on hard court surfaces where they shine brightly. However, Quinn's experience against higher-ranked opponents and their slight superiority in second serve performance may play a crucial role in critical moments.
Previous encounters between Crawford and Quinn have remained tightly contested with each securing a victory, suggesting a competitive showdown. Although both players save breakpoints with similar efficiency, Crawford's ability to convert them into games more frequently could sway the outcome in their favor.
Given Crawford's impressive ability to prevail in deciding sets, alongside their higher overall match win rate in recent times, it appears they might hold a slight edge. Therefore, the prediction leans towards Crawford emerging victorious in this upcoming tennis clash.
Crawford vs Quinn Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Oliver Crawford Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Daniel Merida Aguilar
Player
Oliver Crawford
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oliver Crawford
Player
Hugo Grenier
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
45 of
76)
2
Aces
14
1
Double Faults
7
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
34 of
45)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
36%
(
30 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Oliver Crawford
Player
Gastao Elias
68%
(
67 of
98)
1st Serve %
62%
(
57 of
92)
3
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
1
78%
(
52 of
67)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
47 of
57)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
29%
(
28 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
25 of
92)
95
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oliver Crawford
Player
Miguel Cejudo
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
86%
(
6 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jack Pinnington Jones
Player
Oliver Crawford
80%
(
53 of
66)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
24 of
29)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
18 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oliver Crawford
Player
Alastair Gray
70%
(
72 of
103)
1st Serve %
65%
(
70 of
108)
7
Aces
14
1
Double Faults
6
75%
(
54 of
72)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
50 of
70)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
28%
(
29 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
37 of
108)
111
Total Points Won
100
|
6-7(6) 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Oliver Crawford
Player
Ilya Ivashka
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oliver Crawford
Player
Charles Broom
51%
(
35 of
68)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
7
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Ethan Quinn Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Ethan Quinn
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
73%
(
56 of
77)
5
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
25 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
92
Total Points Won
65
|
6-1 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Henry Searle
63%
(
78 of
124)
1st Serve %
61%
(
73 of
120)
13
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
6
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
45 of
73)
57%
(
26 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
33%
(
41 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
52 of
120)
135
Total Points Won
109
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(11) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Ethan Quinn
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
7
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Vit Kopriva
57%
(
67 of
118)
1st Serve %
60%
(
72 of
121)
11
Aces
6
12
Double Faults
4
84%
(
56 of
67)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
72)
39%
(
20 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
36%
(
42 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
47 of
121)
123
Total Points Won
116
|
5-7 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Oliver Crawford
55%
(
60 of
109)
1st Serve %
58%
(
75 of
130)
16
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
8
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
54 of
75)
55%
(
27 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
34 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
46 of
130)
121
Total Points Won
118
|
4-6 7-6(5) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Li Tu
Player
Ethan Quinn
55%
(
51 of
93)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
92)
11
Aces
14
6
Double Faults
5
86%
(
44 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
34%
(
32 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
5-7 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Ethan Quinn
72%
(
100 of
139)
1st Serve %
66%
(
101 of
153)
7
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
8
79%
(
79 of
100)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
66 of
101)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
29%
(
41 of
139)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
59 of
153)
157
Total Points Won
135
|
4-6 6-1 6-7(2) 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 69% (312/140) | Win/Loss | 58% (122/87) |
| 65% (666/357) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (279/227) |
| 56% (5267/4080) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (2604/2433) |
| 71% (127/51) | Hard Win/Loss | 60% (70/47) |
| 68% (176/81) | Clay Win/Loss | 51% (19/18) |
| 50% (2/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61% (27/17) |
| 54% (7/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 55% (6/5) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.43 |
| 1071 | Aces Total | 1055 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 901 | Total Double Faults | 599 |
| 1:30:32 | Average Match Time | 1:48:53 |
| 445.31 | Average Opponent Rank | 316.97 |
| 63% (16782/26491) | 1st Serve % | 60% (9390/15662) |
| 68% (11495/16782) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (6661/9390) |
| 53% (5132/9709) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (3179/6272) |
| 45% (1291/2854) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (566/1414) |
| 42% (10843/26097) | Return Points Win % | 38% (5961/15562) |
| 25% (2/6) | Slam W/L | 56% (9/7) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 64% (9/5) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 46% (13/15) |
| 50% (47/47) | Challenger W/L | 55% (51/42) |
| 75% (263/86) | Futures W/L | 69% (40/18) |
| 69% (305/440) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (118/200) |
| 20% (1/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 43% (3/7) |
| 56% (62/111) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (51/88) |
| 63% (76/120) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (47/80) |
| 92% (297/272) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (116/99) |
| 8% (297/25) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (116/17) |
| 25% (155/39) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (93/22) |
Crawford vs. Quinn Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
