A. Shah
To Win
L. Midon
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W L W W W L LForm
W W W L L W W L W WThey have played 8 sets in total, with Crawford winning 8 and Shah winning 0. The last match between Crawford and Shah was at the M25 Bengaluru, 04-04-2025, Round: Quarterfinals, Surface: Hard, with Oliver Crawford getting the victory 6-3 6-0.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Oliver Crawford | 4 |
Aryan Shah | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M25 Bengaluru(04-04-2025)
Crawford | Stats | Shah |
---|---|---|
82% (40-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 65% (17-9) |
4 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
267 | Ranking | 445 |
190 | Highest Rank | 445 |
26 | Age | 19 |
R | Plays | - |
13 | Titles | 2 |
69% (302-134) | Career Total W/L | 65% (67-36) |
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
4 | YTD Titles | 1 |
4 | Hard H2H | 0 |
22 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
Hamburg Open - Hamburg atp
22 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
French Open - Paris wta
21 May 2025 / Q2 round
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-0 |
![]() ![]()
Oliver Crawford
Player
Aryan Shah
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
||||
6-1 2-0 ret. |
![]() ![]()
Oliver Crawford
Player
Aryan Shah
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve %
58%
(
19 of
33)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
95%
(
18 of
19)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
40%
(
2 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
4 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
39
Total Points Won
18
|
||||
6-3 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Oliver Crawford
Player
Aryan Shah
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
62)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
6-0 6-3 |
![]() ![]()
Oliver Crawford
Player
Aryan Shah
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
72%
(
26 of
36)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
4 | H2H Matches | 0 |
8 | Sets Won | 0 |
44 | Games Won | 14 |
17 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
8 | Total Double Faults | 13 |
1:1:10 | Average Match Time | 1:1:10 |
66% (118/178) | 1st Serve % | 55% (97/175) |
82% (97/118) | 1st Serve Win % | 51% (49/97) |
50% (30/60) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (30/78) |
55% (16/29) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (3/7) |
55% (96/175) | Return Points Win % | 29% (51/178) |
100% (4/4) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/4) |
100% (4/4) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (4/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (4/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
In analyzing the upcoming tennis match, the performance on second serves has significant implications for predicting the winner. Over the last half-year, Shah's success rate on second serve points is 43.12%, contrasting with Crawford's slightly higher at 46.41%. This statistic, known for its predictive accuracy, favors Crawford slightly. Meanwhile, each player's ability to win points on their opponent's serve also tells a story. Shah has recently secured 46.43% of points on the opponent's second serve, outperforming Crawford's 44.51% in this regard. However, first serve returns reveal that Crawford's efficacy at 28.44% surpasses Shah's 23.25%.
When evaluating the players' proficiency under pressure, Crawford has demonstrated superior skills by saving 57.67% of breakpoints in recent contests, compared to Shah's 44.89%. This could be a deciding factor, especially for those considering in-game betting strategies. Additionally, throughout the past year, Shah and Crawford have shown similar match win percentages; Shah has a 68.75% success rate in matches played, whereas Crawford enjoys a marginally lower 68.12%. The context of these figures connects intimately with the levels of event in which each has participated.
Both players have a distinct surface preference, which could influence the match's outcome. Shah has a career surface win rate of 67% on Indoor hard courts and struggles on clay with just 40%. Crawford, conversely, excels on hard courts with a 71% win rate and has no success on grass. This proclivity for certain surfaces can often determine the predicted victor in closely contested matches. Moreover, the quality of opponents faced sheds light on the experience and adaptability of the players; Shah's opponents had an average ranking of 421.27, whereas Crawford's faced opponents averaging a stronger rank of 234.97.
The head-to-head record between Shah and Crawford shows a clear edge for Crawford, who has won all three encounters without dropping a set. Their last meeting ended in a 6-1, 2-0 retired match in Crawford's favor. The average duration of their matches is below one hour, indicating Crawford's dominance in past duels. Both players have zero tiebreak or deciding set records against each other, further emphasizing Crawford's straightforward victories in head-to-head battles.
When it comes to converting breakpoints, Shah has been in better recent form with a 40.74% conversion rate compared to Crawford's 34.39%. This figure might be influential in live betting scenarios, where momentum shifts rely heavily on seizing breakpoint opportunities. Considering all these analytical insights and metrics, Crawford, with their better head-to-head record and surface preference, emerges as the forecasted winner of this matchup.
Crawford vs Shah Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Miguel Damas
Player
Oliver Crawford
47%
(
51 of
109)
1st Serve %
60%
(
64 of
107)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
53%
(
31 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
42%
(
46 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
54 of
107)
117
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Marko Topo
Player
Oliver Crawford
52%
(
27 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Oliver Crawford
Player
Matthew Dellavedova
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve %
63%
(
20 of
32)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
100%
(
15 of
15)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
5%
(
1 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
39
Total Points Won
14
|
6-1 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Oliver Crawford
Player
Yanaki Milev
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
58
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Oliver Crawford
Player
Viktor Frydrych
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Daniel Merida Aguilar
Player
Oliver Crawford
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
76%
(
64 of
84)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
1
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
44 of
64)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
31 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
30 of
84)
74
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Oliver Crawford
Player
Max Alcala Gurri
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Oliver Crawford
Player
Marvin Moeller
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Aryan Shah
Player
Thiago Cigarran
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
73%
(
30 of
41)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Aryan Shah
Player
Gustavo Ribeiro De Almeida
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
62
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Michael Geerts
Player
Aryan Shah
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
9
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
61)
60
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(7) 2-2 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Aryan Shah
Player
Ergi Kirkin
49%
(
35 of
72)
1st Serve %
45%
(
43 of
95)
3
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
7
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
34 of
43)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
20 of
52)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
95)
91
Total Points Won
76
|
6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Aryan Shah
Player
Taha Baadi
51%
(
36 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
12
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
1
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Aryan Shah
50%
(
43 of
86)
1st Serve %
51%
(
44 of
86)
11
Aces
11
6
Double Faults
3
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Oliver Crawford
Player
Aryan Shah
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Aryan Shah
Player
S D Prajwal Dev
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
44%
(
22 of
50)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
69% (302/134) | Win/Loss | 65% (67/36) |
65% (644/340) | Sets Win/Loss | 62% (141/87) |
56% (5054/3892) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (1125/912) |
71% (124/50) | Hard Win/Loss | 66% (61/32) |
68% (176/81) | Clay Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) |
50% (2/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) |
0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
1001 | Aces Total | 217 |
0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
860 | Total Double Faults | 271 |
1:30:14 | Average Match Time | 1:25:27 |
443.91 | Average Opponent Rank | 390.09 |
63% (16003/25234) | 1st Serve % | 57% (3263/5728) |
68% (10919/16003) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (2223/3263) |
53% (4868/9231) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (1243/2465) |
45% (1253/2757) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (319/687) |
42% (10397/24845) | Return Points Win % | 43% (2551/5891) |
29% (2/5) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
46% (37/43) | Challenger W/L | 44% (4/5) |
75% (263/86) | Futures W/L | 67% (63/31) |
69% (295/425) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 66% (65/99) |
25% (1/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
57% (58/101) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (7/15) |
63% (72/115) | Deciding Set Win % | 65% (17/26) |
92% (287/264) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (66/59) |
8% (287/23) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (66/7) |
25% (149/37) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (37/8) |