J. P. Ficovich
To Win
F. Cina
To Win
Oliver Bonding vs Juan Pablo Ficovich Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L L L L L W L
Form
L L L W W L W W W LH2H: Bonding 0 - 1 Ficovich
They have played 2 sets in total, with Bonding winning 0 and Ficovich winning 2. The last match between Bonding and Ficovich was at the Wimbledon - London, 25-06-2025, Round: Q2 round, Surface: Grass, with Juan Pablo Ficovich getting the victory 7-5 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Oliver Bonding | 0 |
| Juan Pablo Ficovich | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Wimbledon - London(25-06-2025)
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Oliver Bonding
7
5
6
4
| Bonding | Stats | Ficovich |
|---|---|---|
| 47% (8-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 55% (26-21) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| N/A | Ranking | 155 |
| Highest Rank | 125 | |
| 18 | Age | 28 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 1 | Titles | 13 |
| 39% (9-14) | Career Total W/L | 57% (404-311) |
| $41,500 | Career Prize Money | $322,630 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
08 Jul 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fritz VS Khachanov PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
08 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Swiatek VS Samsonova PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
09 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-4 |
Stats 
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Oliver Bonding
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
6
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
4
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 9 | Games Won | 13 |
| 10 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:25:0 | Average Match Time | 1:25:0 |
| 64% (42/66) | 1st Serve % | 67% (44/66) |
| 71% (30/42) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (33/44) |
| 42% (10/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 59% (13/22) |
| 14% (1/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 60% (3/5) |
| 30% (20/66) | Return Points Win % | 39% (26/66) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Bonding vs Ficovich Match Preview :
- When examining second serve performance over the past six months, Bonding has a slight edge, winning 48.46% of points, compared to Ficovich's 44.57%. Could this impact their head-to-head performance? Possibly, given the correlation with match outcomes.
- In return games, Ficovich performs slightly better on second serves, winning 45.28% of points versus Bonding's 43.65%. For first serves, Ficovich again holds a lead with 26.63% compared to Bonding’s 25.56%.
- Under pressure, Bonding narrowly surpasses Ficovich in breakpoint save percentage, at 55.34% to 53.2%. Could this resilience under pressure give Bonding the upper hand? It certainly might during crucial game situations.
- Looking at overall performance over the past year, Ficovich has had a slightly better win rate at 55.13% in comparison to Bonding's 47.37%.
- Analyzing surface performance, Ficovich excels on clay (59% win rate), while Bonding performs best on indoor hard courts (83% win rate). Neither seems particularly strong on grass.
- In the past year, Ficovich has contested higher-level tournaments (Challengers/ITF > $10K) with a win rate of 56.25%, while Bonding focused on Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K events, achieving a 47.06% win rate.
- Against higher-ranked opponents, Ficovich has faced competitors averaging a rank of 259.46, noticeably tougher than Bonding's average opponent rank of 487.89.
- In deciding sets, Bonding has a slight edge, winning 50% compared to Ficovich’s 48%.
- Regarding break point conversion, Bonding again stands ahead with 33.93% compared to Ficovich’s 31.41%.
Editorial Prediction (June 25, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match presents an intriguing battle of strengths between Ficovich and Bonding. Ficovich shows a consistent ability to return serve effectively, slightly outpacing Bonding in this aspect. Also, his experience playing against tougher opponents could give him an edge, strategically speaking.
Conversely, Bonding displays a competence in converting break points and maintaining composure under pressure, both being critical elements for success in tight match situations. His prowess on indoor hard surfaces, although not particularly relevant if the current event doesn't match, suggests a versatile skill set.
While both players exhibit competitive qualities, the tendency of Bonding to capitalize on break point opportunities and handle pressure situations, combined with comparable stats in deciding sets, positions him marginally as the favorite for this matchup. Therefore, it's likely that Bonding will emerge victorious in the forthcoming encounter.
Bonding vs Ficovich Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Oliver Bonding Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 1-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Oliver Bonding
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
6
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
4
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Oliver Bonding
Player
Viktor Durasovic
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
61 of
101)
12
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
28 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
101)
94
Total Points Won
95
|
7-5 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eliot Spizzirri
Player
Oliver Bonding
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
5
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Florent Bax
Player
Oliver Bonding
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve %
75%
(
24 of
32)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
11 of
16)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
8 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
37
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernard Tomic
Player
Oliver Bonding
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
7
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(0) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matisse Bobichon
Player
Oliver Bonding
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
69%
(
48 of
70)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Juan Pablo Ficovich Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Luka Pavlovic
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
51%
(
31 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
11
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
0
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
35 of
43)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
15 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
17 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Frederico Ferreira Silva
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
15 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
28 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Oriol Roca Batalla
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
89)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
25%
(
16 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
89)
86
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Ivan Gakhov
57%
(
48 of
84)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
65)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
66%
(
63 of
96)
1st Serve %
76%
(
79 of
104)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
0
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
45 of
79)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
33%
(
32 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
104)
108
Total Points Won
92
|
1-6 7-5 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Oliver Bonding
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
6
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
4
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Carlos Taberner
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
42 of
74)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(0) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
56%
(
45 of
81)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
4
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 39% (9/14) | Win/Loss | 57% (404/311) |
| 42% (22/30) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (914/741) |
| 46% (245/285) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (8167/7529) |
| 33% (3/6) | Hard Win/Loss | 47% (42/47) |
| 0% (0/4) | Clay Win/Loss | 59% (351/240) |
| 83% (5/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 31% (8/18) |
| 25% (1/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 33% (3/6) |
| 0.4 | Aces Per Game | 0.27 |
| 105 | Aces Total | 2097 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 47 | Total Double Faults | 1239 |
| 1:38:2 | Average Match Time | 1:28:58 |
| 454.17 | Average Opponent Rank | 451.75 |
| 60% (884/1472) | 1st Serve % | 62% (26370/42702) |
| 66% (582/884) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (17904/26370) |
| 51% (298/588) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (8330/16332) |
| 41% (44/108) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1859/4493) |
| 36% (521/1463) | Return Points Win % | 41% (17660/43583) |
| 50% (1/1) | Slam W/L | 39% (9/14) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 45% (9/11) |
| 0% (0/2) | Challenger W/L | 51% (179/171) |
| 42% (8/11) | Futures W/L | 64% (206/114) |
| 39% (9/23) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (398/707) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 58% (7/12) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (101/210) |
| 33% (2/6) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (117/227) |
| 73% (11/8) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (402/339) |
| 27% (11/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (402/63) |
| 8% (12/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (312/62) |
Bonding vs. Ficovich Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
