Oliver Bonding vs Jason Murray Kubler Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L L L L L W L
Form
W W W W W W W W W LHead To Head: Bonding 0 - 0 Kubler
| Bonding | Stats | Kubler |
|---|---|---|
| 47% (8-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 80% (32-8) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | 201 |
| Highest Rank | 63 | |
| 18 | Age | 32 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 1 | Titles | 25 |
| 39% (9-14) | Career Total W/L | 68% (446-214) |
| $41,500 | Career Prize Money | $1,243,795 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 4 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fritz VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
11 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Anisimova VS Swiatek PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
12 Jul 2025 / Final
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Bonding vs Kubler Match Preview :
- Second serve comparisons reveal a slight edge for Bonding, winning 47% of points compared to Kubler's 44.56% in recent matches. Could this small advantage influence the match outcome?
- When evaluating return game performance, Kubler outperforms Bonding on second serve returns with 45.55% versus Bonding's 43.6%.
- In first serve returns, Bonding has the upper hand, claiming 25.71% of opponents' points, a better statistic than Kubler's 21.41%.
- Under pressure, Kubler saves 55.32% of breakpoints, slightly more than Bonding's 52.69% rate, suggesting Kubler may handle critical moments slightly better.
- Overall match performance over the past year heavily favors Kubler, who has an impressive 79.59% win rate compared to Bonding's 44.44%.
- Surface preference analysis shows Bonding's best success on indoor hard courts with an 83% win rate, whereas Kubler excels on clay with a 70% win rate.
- Match level and frequency details highlight Kubler's dominance in Futures events with an 86.21% win rate, significantly outpacing Bonding's 47.06%.
- In contests against higher-ranked players, Kubler has faced opponents with a stronger average rank of 418.63, compared to Bonding's 502.
- If this match extends to a deciding set, Kubler again has shown resilience, winning 50% of such sets, superior to Bonding's 33% success rate.
- Concerning breakpoint conversion, Bonding is slightly more efficient, converting 34.69% of chances compared to Kubler's 31.03%.
Editorial Prediction (June 23, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing recent performance, Kubler exhibits a strong all-around game, overcoming Bonding in various metrics like return games and breakpoint saves. Kubler's consistency in winning matches, particularly on his favored clay surface, coupled with experience against higher-ranked players, further reinforces his advantage.
Bonding's slight edge in second serve efficiency and breakpoint conversion showcases certain strengths, but these may not be sufficient to offset Kubler's broader competence and mental toughness in decisive moments.
While Bonding has been successful in specific conditions, overall trends suggest Kubler has the upper hand. Therefore, based on the analyzed data, Jason Kubler is the likely winner of this upcoming tennis match.
Bonding vs Kubler Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Oliver Bonding Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 1-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats 
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Oliver Bonding
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
6
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
4
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Oliver Bonding
Player
Viktor Durasovic
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
61 of
101)
12
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
28 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
101)
94
Total Points Won
95
|
7-5 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eliot Spizzirri
Player
Oliver Bonding
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
5
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Florent Bax
Player
Oliver Bonding
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve %
75%
(
24 of
32)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
11 of
16)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
8 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
37
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernard Tomic
Player
Oliver Bonding
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
7
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(0) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matisse Bobichon
Player
Oliver Bonding
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
69%
(
48 of
70)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Jason Murray Kubler Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
57%
(
55 of
96)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
103)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
47 of
55)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
46 of
60)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
30 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
32 of
103)
98
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(6) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Alejandro Moro Canas
52%
(
34 of
66)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
98)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
42 of
67)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
86
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Yan Bai
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Kuan-Yi Lee
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
10
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Mikalai Haliak
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
80%
(
61 of
76)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
18 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Chase Ferguson
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
7
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Xirui Han
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
46%
(
26 of
56)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Alibek Kachmazov
61%
(
70 of
115)
1st Serve %
51%
(
57 of
111)
6
Aces
11
5
Double Faults
5
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
44 of
57)
64%
(
29 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
37 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
41 of
111)
119
Total Points Won
107
|
7-5 6-7(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 39% (9/14) | Win/Loss | 68% (446/214) |
| 42% (22/30) | Sets Win/Loss | 64% (989/549) |
| 46% (245/285) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (8004/6453) |
| 33% (3/6) | Hard Win/Loss | 66% (158/80) |
| 0% (0/4) | Clay Win/Loss | 70% (249/106) |
| 83% (5/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 38% (6/10) |
| 25% (1/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 65% (33/18) |
| 0.4 | Aces Per Game | 0.3 |
| 105 | Aces Total | 2155 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 47 | Total Double Faults | 1831 |
| 1:38:2 | Average Match Time | 1:9:42 |
| 454.17 | Average Opponent Rank | 505.68 |
| 60% (884/1472) | 1st Serve % | 61% (19198/31240) |
| 66% (582/884) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (13733/19198) |
| 51% (298/588) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (6098/12041) |
| 41% (44/108) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1424/3230) |
| 36% (521/1463) | Return Points Win % | 40% (12677/31524) |
| 50% (1/1) | Slam W/L | 51% (25/24) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 36% (4/7) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 47% (24/27) |
| 0% (0/2) | Challenger W/L | 67% (166/81) |
| 42% (8/11) | Futures W/L | 75% (226/74) |
| 39% (9/23) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 69% (427/619) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 48% (15/31) |
| 58% (7/12) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (112/203) |
| 33% (2/6) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (107/186) |
| 73% (11/8) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (425/384) |
| 27% (11/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (425/38) |
| 8% (12/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (235/61) |
Bonding vs. Kubler Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
