O. Danilovic
To Win
L. A. Fernandez
To Win
Olga Danilovic vs Suzan Lamens Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W L W L W L
Form
W W W W W L L W L LHead-2-Head: Danilovic 2 - 0 Lamens
They have played 4 sets in total, with Danilovic winning 4 and Lamens winning 0. The last match between Danilovic and Lamens was at the Open Capfinances Rouen Metropole - Rouen, 19-04-2025, Round: Semifinals, Surface: Clay, with Olga Danilovic getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Olga Danilovic | 2 |
| Suzan Lamens | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Open Capfinances Rouen Metropole - Rouen(19-04-2025)
Olga Danilovic
Suzan Lamens
6
4
6
4
| Danilovic | Stats | Lamens |
|---|---|---|
| 65% (15-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 55% (16-13) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 34 | Ranking | 67 |
| 33 | Highest Rank | 64 |
| 24 | Age | 25 |
| L | Plays | - |
| 11 | Titles | 8 |
| 64% (220-126) | Career Total W/L | 58% (301-220) |
| $1,713,453 | Career Prize Money | $447,968 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
Upcoming Match
25 May 2025 / First
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Krejcikova VS Maria PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Avanesyan VS Kalinina PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Olga Danilovic
Player
Suzan Lamens
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats
Olga Danilovic
Player
Suzan Lamens
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
58%
(
18 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
45%
(
24 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 24 | Games Won | 13 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:27:35 | Average Match Time | 1:27:35 |
| 66% (75/114) | 1st Serve % | 63% (73/115) |
| 63% (47/75) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (47/73) |
| 54% (21/39) | 2nd Serve Win % | 26% (11/42) |
| 56% (10/18) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 56% (5/9) |
| 50% (57/115) | Return Points Win % | 40% (46/114) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Danilovic vs Lamens Match Preview :
In the realm of tennis predictions, assessing second serve performance offers insightful clues. In the last six months, Danilovic has secured 41.54% of points on her second serve, surpassing Lamens, who has claimed 39.81% of these points. This nuanced edge significantly aligns with forecasting match outcomes.
When examining return game statistics, Danilovic registers a 45.31% success rate in winning points off her opponent's second serve recently, while Lamens boasts a slightly superior 50.79% success rate. Their performance against first serves is closely matched: Danilovic at 30.86% and Lamens at 30.98%. This similarity draws a near-parity prediction in their head-to-head matchup.
The under-pressure analysis reveals Danilovic has a breakpoint save rate of 48.02% in contrast to Lamens’ 46.34%. Such figures prove valuable during in-game betting scenarios. Considering the overall performance, Danilovic has a favorable win percentage of 72.13% in the past year compared to Lamens’ 58.21%, offering a broader perspective on predictive outcomes.
The surface advantage is key, with both players excelling on clay courts. Danilovic, winning 71% of her clay matches, holds a strategic edge over Lamens, who stands at a 61% win rate on this surface. Their grass court performances, however, are not as robust, with Danilovic at a 47% success rate and Lamens trailing at 14%, emphasizing clay as a significant determinant.
In terms of the level of competition, Danilovic has dominantly participated in Challengers/ITF tournaments, boasting an 80.95% win rate. Conversely, Lamens’ 63.64% success rate on the Main tour underscores the contextual importance of competition level in predictions. An additional focal point is their prior encounters; they've met once with Danilovic clinching the win, concluding at W100 Madrid, suggesting a slight predictive edge.
Regarding their play under extreme pressure, neither player has battled in a tiebreak against each other, rendering this facet less predictive of intense decisive moments. However, Danilovic's 71% success in deciding sets, compared to Lamens’ 60%, subtly indicates stamina advantage if this match extends to a final set.
When evaluating their matches against elite opponents, Danilovic has consistently faced higher-ranked adversaries (average rank 104.41) than Lamens (average rank 137.22), contributing to a more formidable match preparation and competitive acuity. Moreover, in recent form, Danilovic's breakpoint conversion stands at 32.11%, while Lamens improved to 36.87%, an essential statistic for live betting decisions, especially under the high stakes of breakpoint opportunities.
All factors considered, the statistics suggest Danilovic holds a slight advantage going into the match, forecasted to seize victory given her superior historical performance, current form, and strategic prowess on the favored clay surface.
Danilovic vs Lamens Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Olga Danilovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Qinwen Zheng
Player
Olga Danilovic
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
60)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Olga Danilovic
Player
Katerina Siniakova
68%
(
74 of
109)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
54%
(
40 of
74)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
39 of
55)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
10 of
39)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
48%
(
52 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
94)
102
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ekaterina Alexandrova
Player
Olga Danilovic
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Olga Danilovic
Player
Victoria Azarenka
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Elina Svitolina
Player
Olga Danilovic
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
75%
(
63 of
84)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
84)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Olga Danilovic
Player
Suzan Lamens
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Olga Danilovic
Player
Moyuka Uchijima
65%
(
75 of
116)
1st Serve %
66%
(
65 of
98)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
40 of
65)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
44 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
98)
113
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(9) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Olga Danilovic
Player
Linda Fruhvirtova
58%
(
55 of
95)
1st Serve %
62%
(
51 of
82)
2
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
4
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
35%
(
14 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
44 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Suzan Lamens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Suzan Lamens
54%
(
37 of
68)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
8
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Suzan Lamens
55%
(
46 of
83)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
93)
6
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
6
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
96
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Renata Zarazua
49%
(
32 of
65)
1st Serve %
73%
(
56 of
77)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
56%
(
18 of
32)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
46%
(
30 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-1 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emma Raducanu
Player
Suzan Lamens
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Olga Danilovic
Player
Suzan Lamens
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
55%
(
18 of
33)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
48%
(
24 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Linda Noskova
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
5
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Bianca Vanessa Andreescu
59%
(
55 of
94)
1st Serve %
67%
(
73 of
109)
2
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
1
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
44 of
73)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
33 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
95
|
6-1 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64% (220/126) | Win/Loss | 58% (301/220) |
| 61% (486/312) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (667/526) |
| 54% (4007/3372) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (5751/5109) |
| 54% (43/37) | Hard Win/Loss | 54% (80/67) |
| 70% (148/63) | Clay Win/Loss | 60% (188/123) |
| 55% (22/18) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (32/24) |
| 47% (7/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 14% (1/6) |
| 0.27 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 958 | Aces Total | 848 |
| 0.37 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.47 |
| 1333 | Total Double Faults | 2465 |
| 1:35:52 | Average Match Time | 1:29:27 |
| 317.45 | Average Opponent Rank | 427.36 |
| 59% (13747/23204) | 1st Serve % | 59% (18396/31247) |
| 65% (8898/13747) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (11353/18349) |
| 48% (4511/9457) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (5515/12923) |
| 49% (1412/2878) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (2114/4168) |
| 46% (10668/23323) | Return Points Win % | 48% (15062/31394) |
| 63% (36/21) | Slam W/L | 25% (3/9) |
| 41% (11/16) | Masters W/L | 42% (5/7) |
| 70% (7/3) | Cups W/L | 73% (11/4) |
| 58% (42/30) | Main Tour W/L | 53% (27/24) |
| 68% (114/54) | Challenger W/L | 62% (166/101) |
| 83% (10/2) | Futures W/L | 54% (89/75) |
| 64% (216/339) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (298/517) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 58% (49/84) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (48/97) |
| 55% (61/110) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (86/153) |
| 86% (220/189) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (276/249) |
| 14% (220/31) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (276/27) |
| 24% (125/30) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (245/52) |
Danilovic vs. Lamens Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
