Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Oleg Prihodko vs Cem Ilkel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Prihodko vs Ilkel analysis and find out who is favored!
Oleg Prihodko vs Cem Ilkel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Prihodko has won 52.56% of points on his second serve, while Ilkel has won 47.74%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Prihodko, in recent form, has won 54.46% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ilkel has won 51.79%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.35% and 25.31% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Prihodko has saved 52.69% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ilkel has saved 53.85% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Prihodko has won 60% of matches played (W/L 36/ 24), with Ilkel winning 39.58% (W/L 19/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Prihodko has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 250/ 185), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 254/ 162), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Prihodko has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 70% of matches (W/L 35/ 15), where as Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 37.5% of matches (W/L 12/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Prihodko winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Prihodko winning 2 and Ilkel winning 1. The last match between Prihodko and Ilkel was at the Antalya 4 Challenger, 10-12-2021, Quarterfinals, Clay with Oleg Prihodko getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:54:6.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Prihodko and Ilkel have played a deciding set 1 times, with Prihodko winning 1 times and Ilkel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Prihodko winning 0, and Ilkel 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Prihodko has played against opponents with an average rank of 192.35 while Ilkel has played against players with an average rank of 236.83.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Prihodko has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ilkel has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Prihodko has converted 49.26% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ilkel has converted 44.76% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Prihodko 1 - 0 Ilkel
562
Rank
349
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
418
Rank
144
High
28
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
57% (302-228)
Career Total W/L
56% (400-309)
75% (21-7)
YTD W/L
44% (8-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$225,530
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Oleg Prihodko | Cem Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:54:6 | 1:54:6 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (54/79) | 61% (48/79) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (38/54) | 58% (28/48) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (13/25) | 52% (16/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 83% (5/6) | 60% (3/5) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (35/79) | 35% (28/79) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 3-6 6-2 |
Stats 
Oleg Prihodko
Player
Cem Ilkel
68%
(
54 of
79)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
28 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Oleg Prihodko | Cem Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 75% (21/7) | 44% (8/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 71% (45/18) | 43% (17/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 60% (337/225) | 46% (165/195) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (8/4) | 43% (3/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 81% (13/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 45% (5/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.41 | 0.54 |
| Aces Total | 113 | 94 |
| DFs per game | 0.13 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 36 | 42 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:15 | 1:28:14 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 116.79 | 162.39 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (1023/1704) | 57% (616/1073) |
| 1st Serve W% | 75% (763/1023) | 72% (442/616) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 54% (368/681) | 46% (210/457) |
| BPs Won% Total | 51% (102/199) | 43% (32/74) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (797/1787) | 36% (378/1044) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (7/7) |
| Futures W/L | 75% (21/7) | 33% (1/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 75% (21/28) | 41% (7/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 80% (4/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 57% (4/7) | 60% (3/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (21/19) | 75% (8/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (21/2) | 25% (8/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (7/2) | 20% (10/2) |
Oleg Prihodko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mika Brunold
Player
Oleg Prihodko
51%
(
23 of
45)
1st Serve %
51%
(
27 of
53)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Facundo Juarez
Player
Oleg Prihodko
65%
(
64 of
99)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
103)
0
Aces
10
7
Double Faults
3
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
42%
(
42 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
44 of
103)
101
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Oleg Prihodko
Player
Evgenii Tiurnev
46%
(
32 of
69)
1st Serve %
51%
(
41 of
80)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
68%
(
25 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
18 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oleg Prihodko
Player
Stefan Palosi
52%
(
43 of
83)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
89)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
30 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Oleg Prihodko
Player
Giuseppe La Vela
48%
(
22 of
46)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oleg Prihodko
Player
Matthias Ujvary
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
46%
(
18 of
39)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
57
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Henrik Wiersholm
Player
Oleg Prihodko
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
68)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Oleg Prihodko
Player
Alexandros Skorilas
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
95%
(
18 of
19)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
4 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oleg Prihodko
Player
Jacob Bradshaw
66%
(
61 of
92)
1st Serve %
57%
(
56 of
98)
7
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
7
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
27 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
98)
105
Total Points Won
85
|
6-7(4) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Oleg Prihodko
Player
Markus Malaszszak
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Petr Nesterov
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Yousef Khamis
47%
(
34 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
9
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
5
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Agwi
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
11
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
100%
(
21 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Johan Nikles
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Illya Marchenko
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(6) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Kyle Edmund
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
98)
12
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
13
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Cem Ilkel
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
6
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Prihodko Vs Ilkel Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Cem Ilkel
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
