O. Selekhmeteva
To Win
Y. Miyazaki
To Win
Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Kyoka Okamura Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W W W L W L
Form
L L W W L L W W L LHead To Head: Selekhmeteva 1 - 0 Okamura
They have played 2 sets in total, with Selekhmeteva winning 2 and Okamura winning 0. The last match between Selekhmeteva and Okamura was at the French Open - Paris, 19-05-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Clay, with Oksana Selekhmeteva getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Oksana Selekhmeteva | 1 |
| Kyoka Okamura | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: French Open - Paris(19-05-2025)
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Kyoka Okamura
6
3
6
2
| Selekhmeteva | Stats | Okamura |
|---|---|---|
| 61% (19-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 33% (9-18) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 145 | Ranking | 182 |
| 138 | Highest Rank | 178 |
| 22 | Age | 29 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 3 | Titles | 3 |
| 65% (176-94) | Career Total W/L | 54% (362-313) |
| $297,263 | Career Prize Money | $75,106 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
24 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kovalik VS Jarry PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
25 Jun 2025 / Q2 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fruhvirtova VS Boskovic PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
24 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Selekhmeteva VS Okamura H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Kyoka Okamura
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
75%
(
43 of
57)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
Selekhmeteva VS Okamura H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:28:0 | Average Match Time | 1:28:0 |
| 56% (38/68) | 1st Serve % | 75% (43/57) |
| 79% (30/38) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (24/43) |
| 43% (13/30) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (6/14) |
| 36% (4/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 17% (1/6) |
| 47% (27/57) | Return Points Win % | 37% (25/68) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Selekhmeteva vs Okamura Match Preview :
- Second Serve Performance: Selekhmeteva's recent performance shows a 37.9% success with second serves, whereas Okamura is slightly ahead with 38.92%. Could this slight edge influence the match outcome? It might, as successful second serves are crucial.
- Return Game Stats: Selekhmeteva has won 50.86% of points on opponents' second serves, compared to Okamura's 51.3%. For first serve returns, Selekhmeteva is at 32.45%, while Okamura is at 35.26%. Could Okamura's return game offer a strategic advantage? It appears so, especially since effective returns correlate strongly with winning predictions.
- Under Pressure Performance: Selekhmeteva excels at saving breakpoints with a 53.53% success rate, opposed to Okamura's 46.77%. Will Selekhmeteva's composure under pressure be decisive? It's a key statistic for in-game momentum.
- Match Win Rate: Over the past year, Selekhmeteva has clinched 63.79% of her matches, while Okamura has won 56.79%. Does winning more matches signal better form? It often does, hinting that Selekhmeteva might have the upper hand.
- Surface Strength: Selekhmeteva's best surface is Hard (68% wins), and her worst is Indoor Hard (50%). Okamura excels on Grass (64%) and struggles on Clay (44%). How might these preferences affect performance if the match is on Hard court? Selekhmeteva would likely be more comfortable.
- Tournament Level: At the Challengers/ITF level, Selekhmeteva has a better win rate of 68.29% compared to Okamura's 58.82%. Does experience at this level impact results? Typically, yes, indicating Selekhmeteva may be more adept in high-stakes scenarios.
- Opponent Quality: Selekhmeteva generally faces stronger opponents, with an average ranking of 205.83 versus Okamura's 355.44. Is playing against tougher opponents an advantage? Often, it is, as it can enhance a player's competitive edge.
- Deciding Set Performance: Selekhmeteva has a 70% win rate in deciding sets, while Okamura has 59%. Would this matter if the match goes the distance? Yes, it suggests Selekhmeteva can handle tightly contested matches better.
- Break Point Conversion: Selekhmeteva converts break points at 38.13%, compared to Okamura’s 38.97%. Could this minor difference be crucial in tight games? Possibly, as break points often pivot match momentum.
Editorial Prediction (May 19, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing recent performance data, Selekhmeteva demonstrates resilience under pressure with superior breakpoint-saving abilities, which might be pivotal during critical match moments. Her competitive edge is also seen in her ability to prevail in deciding sets.
On the flip side, Okamura shows a solid return game, slightly edging out Selekhmeteva in second serve and break point conversions, which could turn matches around if capitalized efficiently.
Considering the overall higher win rate, proficient handling of top-ranked opponents, and her best surface being Hard, Selekhmeteva appears to have a favorable chance if the court conditions align with her strengths.
Our prediction concludes that Selekhmeteva is more likely to emerge victorious, thanks to her consistency and experience against stronger competition.
Selekhmeteva vs Okamura Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Oksana Selekhmeteva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Hanne Vandewinkel
Player
Oksana Selekhmeteva
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
68%
(
48 of
71)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
9
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Angela Fita Boluda
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marketa Vondrousova
Player
Oksana Selekhmeteva
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
26%
(
5 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
30 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Lola Radivojevic
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve %
44%
(
37 of
84)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
32%
(
8 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
83
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Antonia Ruzic
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Kyoka Okamura
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
75%
(
43 of
57)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Dalma Galfi
Player
Oksana Selekhmeteva
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Aliona Bolsova
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Kyoka Okamura Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Kaja Juvan
Player
Kyoka Okamura
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Kyoka Okamura
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kyoka Okamura
Player
Himeno Sakatsume
64%
(
58 of
90)
1st Serve %
63%
(
81 of
128)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
49 of
81)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
25%
(
5 of
20)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
58 of
128)
110
Total Points Won
108
|
6-4 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyoka Okamura
Player
Vitalia Diatchenko
66%
(
59 of
90)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
96)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
96
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tereza Martincova
Player
Kyoka Okamura
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve %
70%
(
31 of
44)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Kyoka Okamura
81%
(
55 of
68)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kyoka Okamura
Player
Panna Udvardy
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kyoka Okamura
Player
Carolina Meligeni Alves
66%
(
73 of
110)
1st Serve %
76%
(
79 of
104)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
49 of
79)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
40%
(
44 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
104)
111
Total Points Won
103
|
7-5 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65% (176/94) | Win/Loss | 54% (362/313) |
| 62% (380/233) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (830/738) |
| 55% (3117/2567) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (7320/7012) |
| 68% (55/26) | Hard Win/Loss | 54% (269/231) |
| 67% (103/50) | Clay Win/Loss | 45% (25/31) |
| 50% (17/17) | Indoor Hard W/L | 56% (50/39) |
| 50% (1/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 60% (18/12) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 312 | Aces Total | 677 |
| 0.32 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 875 | Total Double Faults | 1593 |
| 1:33:7 | Average Match Time | 1:19:49 |
| 373.97 | Average Opponent Rank | 540.36 |
| 65% (11127/17082) | 1st Serve % | 63% (20848/33192) |
| 61% (6766/11127) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (12630/20848) |
| 46% (2751/5954) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (5624/12342) |
| 49% (1140/2347) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1929/4089) |
| 48% (8294/17389) | Return Points Win % | 45% (15132/33714) |
| 61% (14/9) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/5) |
| 0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (14/13) | Main Tour W/L | 40% (12/18) |
| 68% (129/61) | Challenger W/L | 53% (292/254) |
| 66% (19/10) | Futures W/L | 62% (58/36) |
| 65% (173/267) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (358/670) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 44% (24/55) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (57/124) |
| 59% (44/74) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (111/219) |
| 90% (176/158) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (362/305) |
| 10% (176/18) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (362/57) |
| 19% (94/18) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (313/56) |
Selekhmeteva vs. Okamura Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
