O. Selekhmeteva
To Win
M. Vondrousova
To Win
Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Kamilla Rakhimova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W W W L W W W
Form
L W L W L W W L W LHead To Head: Selekhmeteva 1 - 2 Rakhimova
They have played 7 sets in total, with Selekhmeteva winning 2 and Rakhimova winning 5. The last match between Selekhmeteva and Rakhimova was at the Megasaray Hotels Open 2 - Antalya, 27-03-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Clay, with Oksana Selekhmeteva getting the victory 6-3 3-6 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Oksana Selekhmeteva | 1 |
| Kamilla Rakhimova | 2 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Megasaray Hotels Open 2 - Antalya(27-03-2025)
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Kamilla Rakhimova
6
3
3
6
6
0
| Selekhmeteva | Stats | Rakhimova |
|---|---|---|
| 64% (18-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 36% (9-16) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| 146 | Ranking | 75 |
| 138 | Highest Rank | 60 |
| 22 | Age | 23 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 3 | Titles | 9 |
| 66% (175-92) | Career Total W/L | 57% (227-170) |
| $219,263 | Career Prize Money | $952,899 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
ODDS
Upcoming Match
25 May 2025 / First
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sinner VS Rinderknech PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris atp
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Machac VS Halys PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris atp
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Selekhmeteva VS Rakhimova H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 3-6 6-0 |
Stats 
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Kamilla Rakhimova
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
84)
92
Total Points Won
77
|
||||
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Kamilla Rakhimova
Player
Oksana Selekhmeteva
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
34
|
||||
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats
Kamilla Rakhimova
Player
Oksana Selekhmeteva
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
Selekhmeteva VS Rakhimova H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 5 |
| 24 | Games Won | 33 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:37:19 | Average Match Time | 1:37:19 |
| 61% (114/186) | 1st Serve % | 63% (118/187) |
| 56% (64/114) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (74/118) |
| 42% (30/72) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (36/69) |
| 38% (9/24) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (13/29) |
| 41% (77/187) | Return Points Win % | 49% (92/186) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Selekhmeteva vs Rakhimova Match Preview :
A tennis battle is on the horizon, and the stats hold the clues to unlocking the potential winner of this riveting match-up between Rakhimova and Selekhmeteva. Second serve performance has a story to tell: can Rakhimova, with a recent 39.53% win-rate, outsmart Selekhmeteva, who edges ahead with 40.57%? This subtle difference often translates into decisive advantage on the court, painting an interesting picture when pondering predictions.
Shifting to return game prowess, both players offer compelling narratives. Rakhimova manages to seize 47.15% of her opponent's second serve points, whereas Selekhmeteva capitalizes on 50%. Meanwhile, for first serve returns, both tread similar paths with Rakhimova at 33.14% and Selekhmeteva at 32.61%. These numbers serve as a solid compass pointing toward who might come out on top in this face-off.
Under the microscope of pressure, both wield admirable resilience: Rakhimova rescues 52.24% of breakpoints, just shy behind Selekhmeteva’s 53.43%. Such statistics are a goldmine for in-game betting strategies. The performance overview from the last year throws more light: Rakhimova holds a 51.47% match win record, while Selekhmeteva shines brighter at 66.1%. This win-loss saga deepens the intrigue of predicting an overall head-to-head winner.
Their best surfaces unveil further layers. Rakhimova thrives on indoor hard courts, boasting a 65% victory rate, whereas she slips to 44% on grass. On the other hand, Selekhmeteva reigns on clay with a formidable 68% win ratio, but her indoor hard-court performance dips to an even 50%. Such surface statistics sharpen the focus when predicting matchup outcomes.
When considering event and player levels, the difference becomes apparent: Rakhimova competes predominantly at main tour levels, clinching 57.14% wins. Selekhmeteva, however, flourishes on the Challengers and ITF circuit with a commanding 69.77% victory rate. Given the event level, these stats are invaluable for gauging favorites.
Direct encounters spell a one-sided tale: Rakhimova triumphed in their two prior meetings, clutching all four sets and both matches. Their last clash, at the U.S. Open, ended decisively in Rakhimova's favor. With no decisive set battles or tiebreaks ever played, it suggests Rakhimova’s pronounced head-to-head edge.
The quality of opponents faced also sheds light: Rakhimova has battled players averaging a rank of 133.13, while Selekhmeteva’s adversaries average 204.68. Faced with a deciding set, Selekhmeteva’s 65% win rate offers confidence over Rakhimova’s 48%. These elements culminate into a rich tapestry illustrating potential pathways.
Unraveling the current match-up involves dissecting breakpoint conversion rates. Rakhimova manages a 37.8% success in such clutch moments, with Selekhmeteva slightly more proficient at 40.91%. Can Selekhmeteva maintain this edge when the stakes are highest? As we arrive at the verdict, it's the direct head-to-head dominance that seals the prediction canvas for Rakhimova, whose past victories suggest she might very well repeat history and claim another win.
Selekhmeteva vs Rakhimova Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Oksana Selekhmeteva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Lola Radivojevic
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve %
44%
(
37 of
84)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
32%
(
8 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
83
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Antonia Ruzic
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Kyoka Okamura
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
75%
(
43 of
57)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Dalma Galfi
Player
Oksana Selekhmeteva
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Aliona Bolsova
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Lulu Sun
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
8
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Louisa Chirico
55%
(
39 of
71)
1st Serve %
46%
(
26 of
56)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
7
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Diane Parry
Player
Oksana Selekhmeteva
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
7
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Kamilla Rakhimova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
Player
Kamilla Rakhimova
68%
(
54 of
80)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
7
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
35 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kamilla Rakhimova
Player
Jil Teichmann
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
4 of
22)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Varvara Gracheva
Player
Kamilla Rakhimova
67%
(
78 of
117)
1st Serve %
55%
(
59 of
108)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
16 of
49)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
48%
(
56 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
52 of
108)
113
Total Points Won
112
|
7-5 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kamilla Rakhimova
Player
Moyuka Uchijima
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kamilla Rakhimova
Player
Ksenia Efremova
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Kamilla Rakhimova
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
51%
(
29 of
57)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kamilla Rakhimova
Player
Xinyu Wang
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Victoria Mboko
Player
Kamilla Rakhimova
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
87)
97
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66% (175/92) | Win/Loss | 57% (227/170) |
| 62% (378/229) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (512/410) |
| 55% (3089/2537) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (4462/4081) |
| 68% (55/26) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (104/78) |
| 68% (102/48) | Clay Win/Loss | 56% (75/60) |
| 50% (17/17) | Indoor Hard W/L | 64% (41/23) |
| 50% (1/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 44% (7/9) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 308 | Aces Total | 637 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 859 | Total Double Faults | 1390 |
| 1:33:10 | Average Match Time | 1:42:2 |
| 373.39 | Average Opponent Rank | 226.5 |
| 65% (11013/16902) | 1st Serve % | 59% (16384/27640) |
| 61% (6694/11013) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (10259/16384) |
| 46% (2722/5888) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (5277/11259) |
| 49% (1130/2325) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1573/3281) |
| 48% (8211/17196) | Return Points Win % | 45% (12254/27048) |
| 64% (14/8) | Slam W/L | 50% (21/21) |
| 0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 33% (15/30) |
| 52% (14/13) | Main Tour W/L | 48% (54/58) |
| 68% (128/60) | Challenger W/L | 68% (103/49) |
| 66% (19/10) | Futures W/L | 74% (34/12) |
| 65% (172/264) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (220/390) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 44% (24/55) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (61/107) |
| 59% (44/74) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (67/133) |
| 90% (175/157) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (228/196) |
| 10% (175/18) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (228/32) |
| 20% (92/18) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (169/29) |
Selekhmeteva vs. Rakhimova Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
