S. Sorger
To Win
D. Masur
To Win
Ofek Shimanov vs Daniel Masur Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W L W L W L
Form
W L L L L L L L L LH2H: Shimanov 1 - 0 Masur
They have played 3 sets in total, with Shimanov winning 2 and Masur winning 1. The last match between Shimanov and Masur was at the Davis Cup, World Group, Q, ISR-GER 1-3, 01-02-2025, Rubber 4, I.hard with Ofek Shimanov getting the victory 6-7(2) 6-3 10-8.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ofek Shimanov | 1 |
| Daniel Masur | 0 |
Davis Cup, World Group, Q, ISR-GER 1-3(01-02-2025)
6
7
6
3
10
8
| Shimanov | Stats | Masur |
|---|---|---|
| 50% (1-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 8% (1-11) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 857 | Ranking | 446 |
| 822 | Highest Rank | 176 |
| 19 | Age | 30 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 0 | Titles | 15 |
| 51% (38-36) | Career Total W/L | 57% (401-307) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $156,200 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
27 Apr 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Pegula VS Uchijima PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Shelton VS Mensik PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(2) 6-3 10-8 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 22 | Games Won | 18 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ofek Shimanov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 4 | 6-7(2) 6-3 10-8 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats 
Menelaos Efstathiou
Player
Ofek Shimanov
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
0
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-7(5) 10-7 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Michele Ribecai
Player
Ofek Shimanov
53%
(
52 of
98)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
42%
(
41 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ofek Shimanov
Player
Mariano Tammaro
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
71%
(
65 of
92)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
92)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Orel Kimhi
Player
Ofek Shimanov
58%
(
54 of
93)
1st Serve %
62%
(
65 of
105)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
33 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
48 of
105)
108
Total Points Won
90
|
6-3 6-7(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ofek Shimanov
Player
Attila Boros
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
43%
(
26 of
60)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jirat Navasirisomboon
Player
Ofek Shimanov
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
48%
(
34 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
58
|
6-7(4) 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ofek Shimanov
Player
Hugo Pierre
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
52%
(
43 of
83)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
42%
(
34 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
82
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Masur Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Borna Gojo
Player
Daniel Masur
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
11
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
1
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
37 of
46)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
15 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
23 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Daniel Masur
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
71%
(
52 of
73)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
26%
(
6 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
29 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Marti Pujolras
Player
Daniel Masur
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
52%
(
22 of
42)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Etienne Donnet
Player
Daniel Masur
45%
(
45 of
100)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
14
Aces
7
12
Double Faults
2
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
43 of
60)
47%
(
26 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
98
|
1-6 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tom Paris
Player
Daniel Masur
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
76%
(
53 of
70)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Daniel Masur
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lucas Marionneau
Player
Daniel Masur
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
15
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
92%
(
36 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
20%
(
11 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 4 | 6-7(2) 6-3 10-8 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Daniel Masur
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
77%
(
57 of
74)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
4
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
55
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51% (38/36) | Win/Loss | 57% (401/307) |
| 52% (91/84) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (925/746) |
| 51% (858/837) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (8411/7679) |
| 51% (37/36) | Hard Win/Loss | 56% (87/69) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 55% (143/115) |
| 100% (1/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (162/110) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 41% (9/13) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.37 |
| 92 | Aces Total | 2934 |
| 0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 124 | Total Double Faults | 1863 |
| 1:27:8 | Average Match Time | 1:19:24 |
| 394 | Average Opponent Rank | 511.37 |
| 58% (2483/4266) | 1st Serve % | 64% (26781/41833) |
| 63% (1564/2483) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (19084/26781) |
| 49% (881/1783) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (7376/15052) |
| 39% (209/536) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1614/3923) |
| 42% (1839/4406) | Return Points Win % | 39% (16227/42074) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 43% (10/13) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 29% (12/30) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 52% (191/175) |
| 51% (37/36) | Futures W/L | 68% (187/87) |
| 51% (37/72) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (391/694) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (3/6) |
| 41% (9/22) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (121/254) |
| 44% (12/27) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (128/257) |
| 81% (36/29) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (408/331) |
| 17% (36/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (408/76) |
| 24% (38/9) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (299/66) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
