Prediction of Nuno Borges [41st] vs Jacob Fearnley [74th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L L W L W W L
Form
W L W W W L W L W LHead-To-Head: Borges 1 - 0 Fearnley
They have played 2 sets in total, with Borges winning 2 and Fearnley winning 0. The last match between Borges and Fearnley was at the Phoenix Challenger, 13-03-2025, Second, Hard with Nuno Borges getting the victory 6-2 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nuno Borges | 1 |
| Jacob Fearnley | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 7-5 |
Stats 
Nuno Borges
Player
Jacob Fearnley
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 7 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:18:19 | Average Match Time | 1:18:19 |
| 65% (39/60) | 1st Serve % | 64% (42/66) |
| 77% (30/39) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (28/42) |
| 57% (12/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 29% (7/24) |
| 67% (4/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 17% (1/6) |
| 47% (31/66) | Return Points Win % | 30% (18/60) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nuno Borges vs Jacob Fearnley Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Borges 1 - 0 Fearnley
Editorial Prediction:
How crucial is a second serve performance when predicting the outcome of a tennis match? Over the past six months, Borges has managed to secure 47.93% of the points on his second serve, while his opponent, Fearnley, trails slightly with 43.87%. This statistic often holds significant weight when determining which player might emerge victorious. But does it hold the same weight when we turn our focus to return game statistics?
Examining their ability to counter their opponent's second serve, Borges showcases a return percentage of 44.59%, with Fearnley slightly edging him out at 44.99%. The scene changes slightly when evaluating first serve return efficiency, with Borges capturing 24.22% and Fearnley at 24.82%. These percentages can heavily influence match predictions, especially in a head-to-head scenario. Can their defensive play under pressure make a difference?
When examining their defensive prowess, Borges exhibits a 57.14% success rate in saving breakpoints, a statistic vital for live betting and match predictions. Fearnley, on the other hand, slightly surpasses him with a 59.47% success rate. How do these numbers reflect their overall match-winning capabilities?
Over the last year, Borges has clinched 58.06% of his matches, boasting a win-loss record of 36-26. Fearnley, however, shines with an impressive win rate of 76.67% from his 46-14 record. Their overall performance begs the question: when on their preferred surfaces, who truly holds the advantage?
Diving into surface-specific performance, Borges excels on Hard courts with a win rate of 70%, contrasting sharply with his 38% on Grass. In comparison, Fearnley achieves an 82% win rate on indoor hard courts while maintaining a strong 67% on Grass. How does the level of competition each has faced affect these intriguing stats?
While Borges has spent the past year competing mostly in Main tour events securing a 55.56% win rate, Fearnley's dominance is observed in the Challengers/ITF circuits with an astounding 88.1% win rate. When evaluating the caliber of their opposition, Borges' opponents have averaged a ranking of 98.18, compared to Fearnley's 210.25. When the set count equalizes in a match, how do these stats shift the dynamics?
If the match progresses to a deciding set, Borges has won 72% of such situations in the past year, while Fearnley displays an even more formidable 84% win rate in deciding moments. However, how significant are these percentages when evaluating their breakpoint conversion rates?
Regarding breakpoint opportunities, Borges converts at a rate of 33.33%, while Fearnley does so at 25.9%. This statistic provides valuable insight for live-betting strategies when breakpoint chances arise. Considering all these elements, and despite Fearnley's remarkable form in lower-tier tournaments, Borges' consistent performance against higher-ranked opponents and his capacity to deliver in deciding sets could just tip the scales in his favor for this matchup.
Nuno Borges Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
Nuno Borges
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
29 of
46)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nuno Borges
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
59%
(
67 of
113)
1st Serve %
71%
(
94 of
132)
10
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
57 of
94)
57%
(
26 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
42 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
55 of
132)
126
Total Points Won
119
|
7-5 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nuno Borges
Player
Holger Rune
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve %
53%
(
16 of
30)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
11 of
16)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
42
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roberto Carballes Baena
Player
Nuno Borges
67%
(
60 of
90)
1st Serve %
46%
(
26 of
56)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
20 of
26)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
43%
(
39 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nuno Borges
Player
Raphael Collignon
72%
(
64 of
89)
1st Serve %
63%
(
68 of
108)
12
Aces
12
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
52 of
64)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
27 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
108)
104
Total Points Won
93
|
6-2 3-6 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Nuno Borges
58%
(
57 of
98)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
9
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
37 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alexander Bublik
Player
Nuno Borges
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
16
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
19 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nuno Borges
Player
Colton Smith
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nuno Borges
Player
Jacob Fearnley
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Grigor Dimitrov
Player
Nuno Borges
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
6
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
34%
(
26 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Jacob Fearnley Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Jacob Fearnley
51%
(
23 of
45)
1st Serve %
40%
(
17 of
42)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Roberto Carballes Baena
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
61
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Jacob Fearnley
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
80)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Leo Borg
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
60 of
97)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
23 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
91
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexander Zverev
Player
Jacob Fearnley
90%
(
44 of
49)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
8
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
40%
(
2 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
65%
(
65 of
100)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
98)
13
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
49 of
64)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
37 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
98)
95
Total Points Won
103
|
7-6(6) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Tristan Boyer
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
4
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
0
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Thijs Boogaard
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nuno Borges
Player
Jacob Fearnley
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
James Duckworth
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
8
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
5
85%
(
41 of
48)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
20 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66% (309/156) | Win/Loss | 76% (87/28) |
| 62% (670/419) | Sets Win/Loss | 69% (185/83) |
| 54% (5665/4760) | Games Win/Loss | 57% (1406/1071) |
| 0.36 | Aces Per Game | 0.44 |
| 1844 | Aces Total | 538 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.38 |
| 810 | Total Double Faults | 459 |
| 1:30:54 | Average Match Time | 1:24:25 |
| 354.14 | Average Opponent Rank | 244.63 |
| 64% (19254/29890) | 1st Serve % | 61% (4306/7067) |
| 71% (13657/19254) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (3162/4306) |
| 53% (5649/10636) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (1407/2761) |
| 43% (1273/2954) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (353/794) |
| 40% (12377/30921) | Return Points Win % | 42% (3071/7391) |
| 67% (292/433) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 77% (84/109) |
| 48% (12/25) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 60% (3/5) |
| 51% (85/167) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 68% (19/28) |
| 71% (89/126) | Deciding Set Win % | 78% (25/32) |
| 92% (272/250) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 96% (73/70) |
| 8% (272/21) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 4% (73/3) |
| 31% (193/59) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 40% (42/17) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
