M. Arnaldi
To Win
N. Djokovic
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W W W L L L WForm
L L W L W W W L W LThey have played 2 sets in total, with Djokovic winning 2 and Carabelli winning 0. The last match between Djokovic and Carabelli was at the Miami Open - Miami, 23-03-2025, Round: Third, Surface: Hard, with Novak Djokovic getting the victory 6-1 7-6(1).
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Novak Djokovic | 1 |
Camilo Ugo Carabelli | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Miami Open - Miami(23-03-2025)
Djokovic | Stats | Carabelli |
---|---|---|
65% (13-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 64% (25-14) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
6 | Ranking | 52 |
1 | Highest Rank | 52 |
38 | Age | 25 |
R | Plays | R |
104 | Titles | 12 |
83% (1239-253) | Career Total W/L | 63% (372-214) |
$132,702,820 | Career Prize Money | $462,400 |
0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
22 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
Internationaux de Strasbourg - Strasbourg wta
22 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
Grand Prix De SAR La Princesse Lalla Meryem - Rabat wta
22 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 7-6(1) |
![]() ![]()
Novak Djokovic
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
77%
(
49 of
64)
1st Serve %
50%
(
32 of
64)
10
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
13 | Games Won | 7 |
10 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
2 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
1:45:19 | Average Match Time | 1:45:19 |
77% (49/64) | 1st Serve % | 50% (32/64) |
80% (39/49) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (23/32) |
47% (7/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (15/32) |
43% (3/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
41% (26/64) | Return Points Win % | 28% (18/64) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
In analyzing the second serve performance over the past six months, Carabelli has demonstrated a superior edge, securing 43.44% of points on their second serve relative to Djokovic's 41.89%. This metric is critically linked to accurate match outcome forecasting. Furthermore, returning prowess showcases that Carabelli has won 48.74% of their opponent's second serve points, surpassing Djokovic who has a 37.04% success rate. This metric helps identify who might be favored in head-to-head encounters.
Comparing the players’ performance in recent return games, Carabelli has the advantage on first serve returns, winning 30.21% as opposed to Djokovic’s 23.06%. Such statistics are instrumental in determining match favorites. When examining performance under pressure situations, Djokovic proves slightly more adept, saving 60.69% of breakpoints compared to Carabelli's 53.13%, a significant factor for those interested in in-game betting predictions.
Looking at the general performance overview for the past year, Carabelli has clinched victory in 64.77% of matches (57 wins, 31 losses), whereas Djokovic boasts a more impressive 78.72% win percentage (37 wins, 10 losses). These figures provide critical insights into the head-to-head prediction landscape. The players' proficiencies on different surfaces also vary; Carabelli excels on Clay with a career win rate of 65% (328 wins, 175 losses), while Djokovic shines on Grass with a winning percentage of 86% (124 wins, 21 losses).
Considering player level, Carabelli has predominantly competed in Challenger and ITF events over the past year, achieving a match win rate of 75% (45 wins, 15 losses). In contrast, Djokovic has predominantly participated in Grand Slam tournaments, securing victories in 84.21% of matches (16 wins, 3 losses). The level of competition each has faced also differs, with Carabelli's opponents averaging a rank of 219.4 compared to Djokovic's 85.49.
In terms of deciding set performance over the last year, Carabelli has shown resilience, winning 69% of deciding sets. Djokovic, however, has a lower deciding set win rate at 50% for all tour matches. When the match goes the distance, Carabelli's ability in such scenarios is notable.
Considering break point conversion, Carabelli leads with a conversion rate of 35.24%, outperforming Djokovic’s 26.92%. This is pertinent for live betting, especially when either player faces break point opportunities. Analyzing all facets of their game, it is evident that while Carabelli excels in certain areas, Djokovic's experience in top-tier matches makes him a formidable opponent. Ultimately, combining all statistical evaluations, Djokovic appears to hold the advantage for a favorable outcome in the upcoming match.
Djokovic vs Carabelli Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Novak Djokovic
Player
Marton Fucsovics
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Novak Djokovic
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
Novak Djokovic
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Jakub Mensik
Player
Novak Djokovic
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve %
76%
(
56 of
74)
14
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
43 of
56)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
24 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
22 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Novak Djokovic
Player
Grigor Dimitrov
87%
(
39 of
45)
1st Serve %
53%
(
23 of
43)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
33%
(
2 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Novak Djokovic
Player
Sebastian Korda
83%
(
49 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
11
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
0
84%
(
41 of
49)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
13 of
19)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
20%
(
12 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
17 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R4 |
![]() ![]()
Novak Djokovic
Player
Lorenzo Musetti
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Novak Djokovic
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
77%
(
49 of
64)
1st Serve %
50%
(
32 of
64)
10
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 7-6(1) | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
42 of
80)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Sebastian Baez
59%
(
69 of
116)
1st Serve %
75%
(
55 of
73)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
49%
(
23 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
46%
(
53 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
97
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
56%
(
70 of
125)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
55 of
125)
107
Total Points Won
102
|
1-6 7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Luca Nardi
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Otto Virtanen
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve %
69%
(
54 of
78)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Alexander Zverev
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
80%
(
35 of
44)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Pablo Carreno-Busta
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
69%
(
52 of
75)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
76
|
6-2 1-6 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
83% (1239/253) | Win/Loss | 63% (372/214) |
76% (3001/939) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (818/539) |
59% (22162/15209) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (6757/5770) |
86% (551/91) | Hard Win/Loss | 54% (35/30) |
81% (342/78) | Clay Win/Loss | 65% (336/181) |
78% (222/63) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) |
86% (124/21) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) |
0.41 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
7475 | Aces Total | 1061 |
0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
3019 | Total Double Faults | 1293 |
1:15:7 | Average Match Time | 1:41:16 |
378.53 | Average Opponent Rank | 365.94 |
65% (65913/101516) | 1st Serve % | 62% (23535/37944) |
74% (48971/65913) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (15621/23535) |
56% (19810/35606) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (7131/14408) |
44% (5126/11602) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (2016/4463) |
42% (45017/107095) | Return Points Win % | 43% (16590/38561) |
88% (391/52) | Slam W/L | 42% (8/11) |
81% (424/97) | Masters W/L | 41% (7/10) |
82% (61/13) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
82% (235/53) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (21/21) |
74% (50/18) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
81% (43/10) | Challenger W/L | 66% (190/100) |
80% (16/4) | Futures W/L | 67% (146/72) |
81% (822/1015) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (361/564) |
88% (408/462) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 54% (7/13) |
65% (361/553) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (81/146) |
72% (242/338) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (107/180) |
96% (1120/1077) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (343/305) |
4% (1120/42) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (343/35) |
44% (370/161) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (243/66) |