Norbert Gombos vs Daniel Cukierman Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L W L L W L
Form
L L L L W L W L W LH2H: Gombos 0 - 1 Cukierman
They have played 3 sets in total, with Gombos winning 1 and Cukierman winning 2. The last match between Gombos and Cukierman was at the Glasgow Challenger, 16-02-2025, Q1 round, I.hard with Daniel Cukierman getting the victory 6-3 3-6 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Norbert Gombos | 0 |
| Daniel Cukierman | 1 |
Glasgow Challenger(16-02-2025)
6
3
3
6
6
3
| Gombos | Stats | Cukierman |
|---|---|---|
| 54% (7-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 33% (3-6) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 401 | Ranking | 609 |
| 80 | Highest Rank | 339 |
| 34 | Age | 29 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 10 | Titles | 3 |
| 56% (546-423) | Career Total W/L | 57% (256-194) |
| $1,135,685 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Mensik VS Fritz PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
29 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Pegula PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
28 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 3-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Norbert Gombos
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
3
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
2
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
40 of
51)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
27 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 12 | Games Won | 15 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:44:45 | Average Match Time | 1:44:45 |
| 65% (51/78) | 1st Serve % | 63% (52/83) |
| 78% (40/51) | 1st Serve Win % | 81% (42/52) |
| 41% (11/27) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (15/31) |
| 50% (1/2) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (2/2) |
| 31% (26/83) | Return Points Win % | 35% (27/78) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Norbert Gombos vs Daniel Cukierman Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Norbert Gombos 0 - 1 Daniel Cukierman
Predicting the Outcome of an Upcoming Tennis Match
- Trends in Second Serve Performance: Recent statistics reveal that Gombos has demonstrated exceptional prowess in second serve performance, winning an impressive 51.9% of points over the past six months. In contrast, Cukierman has achieved a slightly lower success rate of 45.7%. Intriguingly, there exists a strong correlation between this particular metric and the accuracy of match predictions.
- Analyzing Return Game Statistics: A closer examination of return game stats uncovers noteworthy insights. Gombos, in recent form, has triumphed in an impressive 53.3% of points on their opponent's second serve, indicating a remarkable ability to capitalize on their opponents' vulnerabilities. Furthermore, Cukierman has showcased commendable performance by winning 51.56% of similar scenarios. These statistics also extend to first serve returns, with Gombos registering a success rate of 30.29%, while Cukierman's stands at 32.99%. This information significantly informs our prediction of the favored player in this upcoming head-to-head match.
- Under Pressure Analysis: Under pressure, Gombos has succeeded in saving an impressive 57.66% of breakpoints in recent matches. In comparison, Cukierman has exhibited remarkable resilience by saving 61.54% of similar situations. This statistical analysis proves valuable in making in-game betting predictions.
- Performance Overview: Examining the overall performance of these players, Gombos has emerged victorious in 52.73% of matches played over the past year (W/L 29/26). Meanwhile, Cukierman has maintained a commendable win rate of 51.35% (W/L 19/18). These figures provide us with a holistic view of their head-to-head prediction.
- Surface Specialization: Individual players often exhibit varying levels of proficiency on different surfaces. For Gombos, their peak career surface win percentage is achieved on Clay, boasting a remarkable 58% success rate (W/L 265/190), whereas their Grass performance lags behind, with a meager 39% win rate (W/L 9/14). On the other hand, Cukierman excels on Clay, boasting a 59% career surface win percentage (W/L 48/33), while seemingly struggling on Grass, having yet to secure a win (W/L 0/1).
- Player Level and Tournament Analysis: Over the past year, Gombos has predominantly competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, achieving victory in 53.19% of matches (W/L 25/22). Likewise, Cukierman has primarily competed in the same caliber of tournaments, managing to secure wins in 51.52% of matches (W/L 17/16). A prudent assessment of player statistics with respect to competition level is vital when forecasting the favored player.
- Opponent Quality: Considering their opponents, Gombos has faced adversaries with an average ranking of 363.6 over the course of the past 12 months. In contrast, Cukierman has contended against players boasting an average ranking of 224.92. This data adds further context to the upcoming match.
- Decisive Set Performance: For those keen on live predictions and betting, the performance of players during decisive sets becomes crucial. Notably, Gombos has emerged triumphant in 55% of such scenarios over the past 12 months, highlighting an ability to maintain composure and excel under pressure. Conversely, Cukierman's performance in decisive sets has been less impressive, with only a 25% success rate in matches played on tour.
- Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: While past player performance holds significance for predicting tennis matches, assessing current event statistics is equally essential to gauge the form of players. For real-time indications of in-form players, refer to the relevant section below. It is important to consider that certain players may exhibit greater proficiency in specific events, influencing the ultimate outcome.
- Break Point Conversion: Recent performance analysis reveals that Gombos boasts an impressive 44.3% conversion rate when presented with breakpoint opportunities. Comparable figures for Cukierman stand at an admirable 47.83%. These statistics prove invaluable for live betting enthusiasts seeking guidance during crucial moments of the match.
- If you are intrigued by models that offer predictive insights into tennis matches, consider reading this publication. (Warning: Suitable for statistical enthusiasts only)
Norbert Gombos Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Oleksii Krutykh
Player
Norbert Gombos
49%
(
58 of
118)
1st Serve %
56%
(
55 of
98)
6
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
4
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
39 of
55)
58%
(
35 of
60)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
36%
(
43 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
98)
115
Total Points Won
101
|
6-1 6-7(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Norbert Gombos
Player
Szymon Kielan
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
37 of
71)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Norbert Gombos
76%
(
61 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Norbert Gombos
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
3
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
2
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
40 of
51)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
27 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 4 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Norbert Gombos
65%
(
68 of
105)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
98)
0
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
5
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
30%
(
11 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
50%
(
52 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
98)
99
Total Points Won
104
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Norbert Gombos
Player
Christian Sigsgaard
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
10
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
32 of
41)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
17 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
23 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Norbert Gombos
Player
Raphael Calzi
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anton Matusevich
Player
Norbert Gombos
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
80%
(
57 of
71)
11
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
0
82%
(
47 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
28 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
71)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Norbert Gombos
Player
Luka Mikrut
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Cukierman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Timofey Skatov
Player
Daniel Cukierman
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve %
70%
(
47 of
67)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
9 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Valentin Vacherot
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
75%
(
45 of
60)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Justin Engel
Player
Daniel Cukierman
73%
(
74 of
102)
1st Serve %
64%
(
72 of
113)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
7
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
50 of
72)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
13 of
41)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
42 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
50 of
113)
110
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(2) 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Joel Schwaerzler
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve %
59%
(
19 of
32)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
13 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
36
Total Points Won
31
|
7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Micah Braswell
Player
Daniel Cukierman
77%
(
61 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
6
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Norbert Gombos
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
3
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
2
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
40 of
51)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
27 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong
Player
Daniel Cukierman
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
7
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
24 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
31 of
72)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rei Sakamoto
Player
Daniel Cukierman
52%
(
45 of
87)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
16
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
38 of
97)
95
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Daniel Cukierman
73%
(
61 of
83)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
93)
0
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
6
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (546/423) | Win/Loss | 57% (256/194) |
| 55% (1264/1044) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (573/444) |
| 52% (11640/10732) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (4844/4284) |
| 56% (120/93) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (181/134) |
| 58% (265/190) | Clay Win/Loss | 59% (50/35) |
| 55% (152/126) | Indoor Hard W/L | 51% (25/24) |
| 39% (9/14) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
| 0.35 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 3861 | Aces Total | 722 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 2700 | Total Double Faults | 1037 |
| 1:16:50 | Average Match Time | 1:11:30 |
| 515.44 | Average Opponent Rank | 416.74 |
| 60% (33369/55422) | 1st Serve % | 63% (13583/21498) |
| 72% (24071/33369) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (8960/13583) |
| 50% (10937/22047) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (3845/7915) |
| 40% (2086/5276) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1142/2423) |
| 39% (21673/56290) | Return Points Win % | 43% (9361/21687) |
| 46% (31/36) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (15/14) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 36% (8/14) | Cups W/L | 38% (5/8) |
| 48% (59/63) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (299/225) | Challenger W/L | 48% (46/50) |
| 66% (134/70) | Futures W/L | 60% (205/135) |
| 57% (529/934) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (252/441) |
| 37% (10/27) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 53% (197/375) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (43/89) |
| 52% (176/336) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (61/124) |
| 84% (537/450) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (254/223) |
| 16% (537/87) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (254/30) |
| 22% (430/95) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (195/32) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
