Noah Thurner vs Matic Spec Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Thurner vs Spec analysis and find out who is favored!
Noah Thurner vs Matic Spec Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Thurner has won 37.5% of points on his second serve, while Spec has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Thurner, in recent form, has won 47.56% of his opponent's second serve points, while Spec has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.19% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Thurner has saved 46.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Spec has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Thurner has won 48.84% of matches played (W/L 21/ 22), with Spec winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Thurner has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 42% (W/L 30/ 42), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 13% (W/L 1/ 7). Spec has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 74% (W/L 14/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 94/ 59).
- Player level: In the last year, Thurner has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 48.84% of matches (W/L 21/ 22), where as Spec has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Thurner winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Thurner winning 0 and Spec winning 2. The last match between Thurner and Spec was at the M25 Vogau, 17-08-2020, Q1 round, Clay with Matic Spec getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Thurner and Spec have played a deciding set 0 times, with Thurner winning 0 times and Spec 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Thurner winning 0, and Spec 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Thurner has played against opponents with an average rank of 12.77 while Spec has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Thurner has won 40% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Spec has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Thurner has converted 40% of breakpoint opportunities, and Spec has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Thurner 0 - 1 Spec
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
819
Rank
710
High
29
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
39% (54-84)
Career Total W/L
64% (167-95)
58% (7-5)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Noah Thurner | Matic Spec |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
Games Won | 7 | 12 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-4 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Noah Thurner | Matic Spec |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 58% (7/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 58% (14/10) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 52% (106/97) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.05 | 0 |
Aces Total | 5 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.14 | 0 |
DFs Total | 14 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 45.75 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 70% (135/193) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 59% (80/135) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 41% (24/58) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 38% (9/24) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 41% (74/182) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 58% (7/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (7/12) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (7/7) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (7/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (5/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Noah Thurner Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
R2 |
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Noah Thurner
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
72%
(
31 of
43)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Noah Thurner
Player
Ante Petar Ercegovic
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
70%
(
33 of
47)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
11 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Noah Thurner
Player
Filip Krolo
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Matic Spec Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Matic Spec
63%
(
63 of
100)
1st Serve %
64%
(
59 of
92)
6
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
3
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
42%
(
42 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
46 of
92)
104
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Matic Spec
Player
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
81
|
1-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Matic Spec
Player
Francesco Passaro
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
107)
0
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
43%
(
42 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
107)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Hikaru Shiraishi
Player
Matic Spec
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
3
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
80%
(
20 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
19%
(
13 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
26 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Matic Spec
Player
Christoph Negritu
59%
(
60 of
102)
1st Serve %
69%
(
63 of
91)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
44 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
100
Total Points Won
93
|
6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Pietro Marino
Player
Matic Spec
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tim Sandkaulen
Player
Matic Spec
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
78%
(
74 of
95)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
49 of
74)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
21 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
95)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Jorge Brian Panta Herreros
Player
Matic Spec
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
6
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 | 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H |
view more